Utility of a breast biopsy clip and a point marker system in tailored axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Tailored axillary surgery (TAS) is a new approach for selective removal of metastatic lymph nodes. This study evaluated the safety and utility of TAS using a breast biopsy clip inserted into a metastatic lymph node and a point marker consisting of a short hook wire and nylon thread to remove the clipped lymph node. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer and clinically confirmed metastases to one-to-three axillary lymph nodes were included in this study. A breast biopsy clip was inserted into the metastatic lymph nodes before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. TAS was performed in patients with ycN0 disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The lymph nodes containing the clips were removed using a point marker. The success criteria for TAS were the removal of the lymph node into which the clip was inserted using a point marker and the identification of the sentinel lymph node. The false-negative rate was calculated for cases in which TAS and axillary lymph node dissection were performed. RESULTS: Thirty individuals from two institutions were enrolled between May 2021 and November 2022, of whom 20 underwent TAS. Ten patients had clinically positive axillary lymph nodes and underwent axillary lymph node dissection. No adverse events were observed in any patient using the clips or point markers. TAS was successful in 18 of the 20 patients (90%). Seven patients underwent TAS and axillary lymph node dissection with a false-negative rate of 0%. CONCLUSION: The use of clips and point markers to perform TAS is clinically feasible.

Safety of a short-term infusion of fosnetupitant in patients with gastrointestinal and breast cancer: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Fosnetupitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Previous phase III trials demonstrated the non-inferiority of its 30-minute infusion to fosaprepitant in efficacy and a favorable safety profile. METHODS: This was a single-arm, phase II study to investigate the safety of a 15-minute infusion of fosnetupitant in patients with gastrointestinal and breast cancer. Patients who had received their dose of fosnetupitant in a 30-minute infusion without developing an allergic reaction were eligible and received their next fosnetupitant dose for 15 minutes. The primary endpoint was the incidence of an allergic reaction during the first 15-minutes infusion, and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of injection site reaction (ISR), the incidence of a grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with fosnetupitant, and complete response (CR) rate. RESULTS: The study period was from February 17, 2023 to June 20, 2023. In an exploratory analysis, medical records from the end of the study period to December 31, 2023 were retrospectively evaluated to assess the time-saving effect and safety of the short-term infusion of fosnetupitant. Fifty-six patients with gastrointestinal and 14 patients with breast cancer were enrolled, one of whom with breast cancer did not receive study treatment at her own request. No allergic reactions occurred during the 15-minutes infusion. Furthermore, there were no allergic reactions across all 280 short-term injections (Table 1). Additionally, no ISR or grade 3 or higher TRAE were reported. The CR rate was 87.0%. CONCLUSION: Short-term infusion of fosnetupitant, administered over 15 minutes, was demonstrated to be safe and effective for patients receiving HEC or MEC (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Trial ID: jRCT1041220144).

Clinical benefit of post-trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment in patients with HER 2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer: A single-institution retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) can improve the prognosis of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, data on treatment recommendations after T-DXd are lacking. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the treatment options after T-DXd and their effectiveness. METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive MBC were included in this study. Data from clinical records were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints were TTF of each treatment and first-line treatment after interstitial lung disease (ILD) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were included. Among them, 18 (62%) were hormone receptor-positive. All patients had a median TTF (mTTF) of 3.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-10.03). The mTTF of each treatment, including HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (HER2 TKI), other anti-HER2 treatments, and other treatments, was 2.6, 8.8, and 3.8 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed between treatments, but regimens that include trastuzumab showed a longer TTF than TKI. However, the mTTF among patients who developed T-DXd-related ILD was 2.33 months (95% CI 0.7-not reached), which was shorter than that among those who did not develop ILD (3.83 months, 95% CI 2.1-10.03, hazard ratio: 2.046, 95% CI 0.760-5.507, p = 0.258). The median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI 11.07-29.17). CONCLUSION: Treatments after T-DXd showed a shorter mTTF. Regimens that include trastuzumab may be more effective post-T-DXd treatment than HER2 TKI. Further data are needed to establish the best sequential treatment after T-DXd.

Correlation between postoperative treatment selection and prognosis determined using the Oncotype DX® test data: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan.

PURPOSE: Oncotype DX® is a frequently used multigene assay for hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. However, limited evidence is available regarding its application in Japan owing to the lack of insurance coverage. Therefore, we conducted this large-scale, retrospective study by collecting data from nine Japanese institutes and assessed postoperative treatment choice and prognosis by using Oncotype DX®. METHODS: Six hundred thirty-two patients who underwent breast surgery and whose recurrence score (RS) data were available were included. They were divided into RS 0-25 and RS ≥ 26 groups. The groups were compared in terms of clinicopathological factors, treatment options, and prognosis. RESULTS: After the median follow-up period of 10.1 years, the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were significantly better in the RS 0-25 group (p = 0.02). Per the recurrent event type, there was no significant intergroup difference in locoregional recurrence (p = 0.139). However, a trend toward better distant DFS was observed in the RS 0-25 group (p = 0.08). Overall survival was also significantly better in this group (p = 0.027). Considering chemotherapy use, DFS worsened among chemotherapy-treated patients with an RS of 0-25 and those with an RS ≥ 26 who did not receive chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Seven (1.35%) chemotherapy-treated patients with an RS of 0-25 showed disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the largest database-derived prognostic data in Japanese patients, utilizing the Oncotype DX® treatment selection. Further studies are needed to determine the impact on treatment choice, considering the clinical risk, and the need for additional postoperative treatment.

A case of simultaneous breast cancer and ovarian cancer based on a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

We experienced a relatively rare case of synchronous breast and ovarian cancer in a patient with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Here, we report the usefulness of laparoscopic examination to determine the subsequent treatment strategy in cases of suspected concurrent multiple carcinomas. Our patient was diagnosed with breast cancer following detection of a right breast mass. She was diagnosed with HBOC as she was found to be harboring a germline pathogenic variant of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1). Preoperative images suggested the presence of neoplastic masses in the abdominal cavity, and the possibility of metastatic peritoneal dissemination of breast cancer or concurrent overlapping of gynecological malignancies was considered. We decided to employ laparoscopic examination, and if simultaneous overlapping of cancers was suspected, we planned to further evaluate whether primary debulking surgery (PDS) for gynecological cancer was possible or not. Laparoscopy revealed the presence of ovarian cancer with neoplastic lesions on the bilateral ovaries and disseminations in the pelvic and abdominal cavities. The total predictive index was 0; therefore, PDS was considered feasible. We performed a total mastectomy, followed by laparotomy, and optimal surgery was achieved. The final diagnosis was simultaneous stage IIB invasive ductal breast carcinoma and stage IIIC high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. In this case of suspected concurrent multiple carcinomas, laparoscopy was beneficial for decision-making regarding subsequent surgical treatment. We believe that the use of laparoscopy will enable simultaneous surgery for breast cancer and ovarian cancer to become one of the treatment strategies in the future.

Single-dose trastuzumab monotherapy achieved pathological complete response (pCR) in a patient with HER2-positive breast cancer: a case report.

BACKGROUND: With advances in breast cancer treatment, the importance of de-escalation therapy to reduce harm during the treatment of elderly patients has attracted attention in recent years. Certain patient populations are expected to have a superior response to anti-HER2 drugs, particularly those with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. In this report, we describe our experience of dramatic anti-HER2 drug response in a patient who achieved pathological complete response (pCR) with a single dose of trastuzumab. CASE PRESENTATION: An 88-year-old woman presented with a 2-cm palpable mass in the left breast. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed estrogen receptor-negative and HER2-positive, T1N0M0, stage I breast cancer. Mastectomy was scheduled within 2 months of the initial visit; however, the patient was anxious about the length of the waiting period and requested medication in the interim. Therefore, prior to surgery, one cycle of trastuzumab monotherapy was administered at the discretion of the attending physician. Postoperative pathology showed no remnant of invasive carcinoma and pCR with only a 0.2-mm ductal carcinoma in situ remnant. The patient refused further medication after surgery because of severe diarrhea after trastuzumab administration. Postoperative treatment was limited to follow-up, and no recurrence was observed at 1 year and 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that trastuzumab monotherapy may be effective in certain patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. In the future, identifying patients who are more likely to respond to trastuzumab, as in this case, will allow for more options regarding de-escalation therapy without chemotherapy, particularly in elderly patients who are concerned about the side effects of chemotherapy.

Evaluation of the Role of Axillary Lymph Node Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Early Breast Cancer With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes (AxLNs) is performed to diagnose nodal metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Although the sensitivity of ultrasound-guided FNAC for identifying AxLN metastasis is in the range of 36%-99%, whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) should be performed for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) patients with negative FNAC results is uncertain. This study aimed to determine the role of FNAC before NAC in the evaluation and management of AxLN in early breast cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 3,810 clinically node-negative (a lymph node with no clinical metastasis without FNAC or radiological suspicion of metastasis with negative FNAC results) patients with breast cancer who underwent SLNB between 2008 and 2019. We compared the positivity rate of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) between patients who received and those who did not receive NAC with negative FNAC results or without FNAC and axillary recurrence rate in the neoadjuvant group with negative SLNB results. RESULTS: In the non-neoadjuvant (primary surgery) group, the positivity rate of SLNs in patients with negative FNAC results was higher than that in patients without FNAC (33.2% vs. 12.9%; p < 0.001). However, the SLN positivity rate of patients with negative FNAC results (false-negative rate for FNAC) in the neoadjuvant group was lower than that in the primary surgery group (3.0% vs. 33.2%; p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 3 years, one axillary nodal recurrence was observed, which was a case from the neoadjuvant non-FNAC group. None of the patients in the neoadjuvant group with negative FNAC results had axillary recurrence. CONCLUSION: The false-negative rate for FNAC in the primary surgery group was high; however, SLNB was the proper axillary staging procedure for NAC patients who have clinically suspicious AxLN metastases on radiologic examination but negative FNAC results.

The Absence of Cancer in the Location of a Breast Tissue Marker After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy may Predict Pathological Complete Response with High Accuracy: Results from a Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to determine pathological complete response (pCR) before surgery in clinical complete response (cCR) cases by imaging alone. We designed a prospective study to evaluate whether a breast tissue marker placed in a tumor before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can predict a pCR, possibly removing the need for surgery. METHODS: We recruited patients with primary invasive breast cancer assigned to undergo curative surgery and possible NAC. A breast marker (UltraClip®) was placed in the primary tumor before standard NAC. We evaluated the probability of no cancer in the marker but cancer in removed specimens from a cCR group. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were enrolled. Patients were categorized by cancer stage and subtypes. Seventy-two patients (70.6%) received standard NAC; 23 (34.3%) attained cCR, of whom pCR was obtained in 12 (52.2%). The probability of no cancer in the marker's location but cancer in the removed specimens was 4.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.1-21.9). The false-negative rate was 9.1% (1/11), and the negative predictive value was 92.3% (12/13). In only one case, no cancer was found in the marker's location, but cancer cells were present in the removed specimen. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of cancer in the location of a breast tissue marker after NAC predicted pCR with high accuracy. Therefore, the rebiopsy of a marker's location might mean surgery is unnecessary.

Satisfaction survey on a preoperative explanation method using three-dimensional breast imaging for breast cancer patients considering breast-conserving surgery.

PURPOSE: Although one of the essential factors in surgical shared decision-making is the body image, the breast morphology after breast-conserving surgery is particularly difficult to explain in a uniform manner due to large individual differences. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer eligible for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were recruited between June 2020 and October 2021. We surveyed the patients' satisfaction with our method of explaining the likely breast morphology after BCS using three-dimensional (3D) breast imaging in the form of a questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were enrolled, and 137 (84.6%) answered the questionnaire. One hundred and sixteen patients (84.6%) answered that they were very satisfied or satisfied with our explanation method, and 100 (73.0%) patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the 3D breast imaging. Some patients answered that 3D breast imaging helped them prepare for BCS, or on the contrary, made them choose mastectomy with breast reconstruction because the deformation likely with BCS was considered unacceptable. Only a few patients who underwent BCS felt that their postoperative morphology was more deformed than the preoperatively imagined one. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that our preoperative explanation method using 3D breast imaging was useful for shared decision-making.

Arthralgia induced by endocrine therapy with or without cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) have been approved for breast cancer (BC) treatment. Several trials suggested that arthralgia was reduced in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i compared with that in those with ET-alone. We aimed to compare arthralgia rates in BC patients treated with/without CDK4/6i. We reviewed randomized controlled phase II/III trials investigating CDK4/6i with ET in hormone receptor-positive and epidermal growth factor 2-negative BC. Publications were retrieved from PubMed from January 2014 to April 2021. We compared arthralgia rates between patients who were administered ET plus CDK4/6i (CDK4/6i group) and those treated with ET-alone (control group). We reviewed 12 trials that reported data on adverse effects for arthralgia. These trials included 17,440 patients (9255 in the CDK4/6i group and 8185 in the control group). The arthralgia rate in the CDK4/6i group was significantly lower than that in the control group (27.6% vs. 34.8%, p < .001), especially in early BC (28.8% vs. 37.3%, p < .001). These suggested that the arthralgia rate in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i was lower than that in patients treated with ET-alone and that CDK4/6i may decrease the arthralgia rate in BC patients treated with ET, especially in early BC.

Time to Chemotherapy for Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitor Use.

PURPOSE: Safely postponing the use of chemotherapy is important for quality of life maintenance in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. In previous studies, a combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and fulvestrant prolonged the time to chemotherapy (TTC). In this study, we used real-world data to evaluate TTC in the context of CDK4/6i therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer treated at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. The patients were categorized into having received CDK4/6i therapy first (n = 41), second (n = 33), and none at all (n = 67). The change in TTC among the groups was examined. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 13.8, 27.5, and 30.3 months in the CDK4/6i (first), CDK4/6i (second), and non-CDK4/6i groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy for metastasis was 30.0, 11.9, and 13.0 months, respectively (CDK4/6i [first] vs. non-CDK4/6i; p = 0.018, CDK4/6i [second] vs. non-CDK4/6i; p = 0.383). The median TTC was not reached in the CDK4/6i (first) group, was 39.1 months in the CDK4/6i (second) group, and was 44.2 months in the non-CDK4/6i group (CDK4/6i [first] vs. non-CDK4/6i; p = 0.880; CDK4/6i [second] vs. non-CDK4/6i; p = 0.407). The non-CDK4/6i group with TTC ≥ 60 months included more cases of secondary endocrine therapy resistance (p = 0.017), no perioperative chemotherapy (p = 0.021), and a longer disease-free interval (p = 0.093). CONCLUSION: Although PFS was significantly longer in the CDK4/6i (first) group than in the non-CDK4/6i group, TTC did not significantly differ among the three groups in real-world data. The non-CDK4/6i group showed a long TTC in patients with late recurrence and low risk at the primary lesion site, who benefited greatly from hormone monotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of talazoparib in Japanese patients with germline BRCA-mutated locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: results of the phase 1 dose-expansion study.

BACKGROUND: Talazoparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enzyme inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients with germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. This two-part study, a recently published dose-escalation part followed by the dose-expansion part reported here, evaluated the efficacy and safety of talazoparib in Japanese patients with gBRCA1/2-mutated advanced breast cancer. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter phase 1 study (NCT03343054), the primary endpoint of the dose-expansion part was confirmed objective response rate (ORR), determined by investigator assessment (RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics. Patients received the recommended phase 2 dose (1 mg/day; 0.75 mg/day moderate renal impairment). RESULTS: Nineteen Japanese patients with gBRCA1/2-mutated locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. Confirmed ORR was 57.9% (11/19; 90% confidence interval [CI] 36.8-77.0). Stable disease was observed in 36.8% (7/19) of patients. Per investigator assessment, median PFS was 7.2 months (95% CI 4.1-not estimable) and 12-month OS rate was 84.7% (90% CI 57.5-95.1). Median OS was not reached; 17/19 patients were alive and censored at 12 months. All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs); the majority were hematologic. The most common treatment-related AE was anemia (68.4%; [13/19]). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were observed in 52.6% (10/19) of patients. During the safety period, there were no grade 5 treatment-emergent AEs, treatment-related serious AEs, or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with gBRCA mutations and locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, talazoparib monotherapy was generally well tolerated and resulted in clinically meaningful ORRs. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03343054.

Impact of Tumor Progression on Survival During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Few patients with breast cancer experience tumor progression during neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), but their poor outcome is similar to that of patients who fail to achieve a pathological complete response (pCR). No previous reports have compared patients with pCR, non-pCR, and progression during NST to determine the survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective chart review of patients with stage I-III breast cancer was conducted between January 2001 and December 2018. pCR was defined as no invasive cancer or in situ residuals in the breast and lymph nodes (ypT0 ypN0). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Of the 595 patients who received NST, 167 (28.1%) had pCR (pCR group), 404 (67.9%) did not attain pCR (non-pCR group), and 24 (4.0%) experienced tumor progression during NST (PD group). The median DFS was 6.0 months, 154.0 months, and not reached in the PD, non-pCR, and pCR groups, respectively. The PD group had significantly shorter DFS than patients without tumor progression in the pCR and non-pCR groups [hazard ratio (HR)=13.0, 95%CI=8.1-21.0, p<0.01]. The median OS was 13.6 months (95%CI=10.4-35.5) in the PD group and was not reached in the pCR and non-pCR (non-PD) groups. The OS was significantly poorer in the PD group than in the non-PD groups (HR=15.8, 95%CI=9.2-27.1, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The PD group had the poorest survival outcome even after recurrence, thus warranting new treatment strategies.

Association between bevacizumab with cancer drug therapies and drug-induced interstitial lung disease in patients with solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine interstitial lung disease (ILD) incidences in patients receiving cancer drug therapies with or without bevacizumab treatment. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were conducted in January 2021. The main inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials that compared bevacizumab with standard treatment in patients with solid tumors. Cochrane Collaboration's Tool was used for assessing risk-of-bias. RESULTS: Thirteen records involving 7201 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were 42 ILD events in bevacizumab groups and 72 in control groups. In bevacizumab groups, the odds ratio for ILD was 0.62 (95% CI 0.42-0.92; p = 0.02), which was a significantly lower incidence than the control. This tendency was shown in targeted therapy groups but not in the cytotoxic agent groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that bevacizumab may reduce the incidence of ILD.

The frequency of low HER2 expression in breast cancer and a comparison of prognosis between patients with HER2-low and HER2-negative breast cancer by HR status.

PURPOSE: The DESTINY-Breast04 clinical trial is currently investigating whether trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is effective in HER2-low as well as HER2-positive breast cancer. This highlights the interest in treatment strategies for patients with HER2-low breast cancer. The current study was therefore designed to determine the frequency of HER2-low among all breast cancers, and to compare the prognosis of HER2-low patients with that of HER2-negative patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the biological data from 4,918 of 4,977 primary breast cancer patients who attended our institute. We quantified the overall frequency of breast cancer patients with a new HER2-low subtype that was defined by an immunohistochemistry score of IHC1 + or IHC2 + /ISH-. We then compared the clinical characteristics and prognosis of HER2-low patients with that of patients who did not have HER2 amplification (HER2-0). RESULTS: Low HER2 expression was found in 3169 (64.4%) patients; 2860 (58.1%) were HR-positive and 309 (6.3%) were HR-negative. Among HER2-0 patients, 681 (13.9%) were HR-positive and 157 (3.2%) were HR-negative. The HER2-0 group tended to have more poor prognostic factors than the HER2-low group, irrespective of HR status. There were no statistically significant differences between the prognosis of HER2-low and HER2-0 patients, regardless of HR status. However, patients in the HER2-low group tended to have better prognosis than those in the HER2-0 group. CONCLUSION: HER2-low patients did not have a significantly different prognosis than HER2-0 patients, regardless of HR status. However, we should consider tailoring therapies for patients with HRE2-low early breast cancer according to their HR status.

Differences in baseline risk estimated by physicians and patients with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Physicians recommend adjuvant therapy to patients based on baseline risk. A common recognition for baseline risk between patients and physicians is critical for successful adjuvant therapy. We prospectively investigated the differences in estimated baseline risk between physicians and patients with early breast cancer. METHODS: This analysis was performed at a single institution in Japan. Early breast cancer patients over 18 years old were enrolled after surgery. After explaining the pathological results, physicians asked each patient about an estimated baseline risk. Differences in estimated baseline risk were defined as the baseline risk estimated by patients minus the baseline risk estimated by physicians. The primary endpoint was that the number of patients who estimate baseline risk higher than physicians was higher than those who estimate a lower baseline risk. The secondary endpoints were differences in estimated baseline risk by stage, subtype and the influence of patient factors to differences in estimated baseline risk. RESULTS: From July 2017 to December 2018, 262 patients were enrolled. Among the 262 patients, 190 estimated a higher baseline risk than physicians, 53 estimated a lower baseline risk and 19 estimated the same. Overall, patients estimated a significantly higher baseline risk than physicians (P < 0.001). Differences in estimated baseline risk was significantly smaller in patients who knew the term 'baseline risk' than patients who did not (P = 0.0037). Differences in estimated baseline risk were also significantly smaller in patients with stage II breast cancer than patients with stage I (P = 0.0239). However, there were no statistically significant differences of differences in estimated baseline risk according to other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early breast cancer estimated a significantly higher baseline risk than physicians. Physicians should accurately explain baseline risk to patients for shared decision making.

Compression therapy using surgical gloves does not prevent paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy: results from a double-blind phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse effect of paclitaxel (PTX). There is no known prophylactic measure, although there are some reports of prevention with compression therapy using surgical gloves. On account of its predominantly subjective symptoms, it is difficult to exclude bias when assessing for CIPN. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of the same procedure for the prevention of paclitaxel-induced PN based on a double-blind study design. METHODS: The patients with early and recurrent breast cancer (with no prior PTX exposure) initiating weekly chemotherapy with PTX 80 mg/m2 were enrolled. Each patient donned two gloves on each hand at every PTX infusion. Two one-size-smaller gloves were donned on one hand (study side) and two normal-size gloves were donned on the other hand (control side) during 90 min from 30 min before the infusion to 30 min after the end of the infusion. Study side are blind for both patients and assessing physicians according to determination of the study side by research nurses in the chemotherapy unit. The primary outcome was the difference in the frequency of CIPN (motor/sensory) determined by the physician using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v4.0), with an evaluation at each cycle of PTX infusion. McNemar test was used to assess the primary outcome. RESULTS: Between July 2017 and November 2018, 56 patients were enrolled and 49 patients were evaluated. Overall, Grade ≥ 2 PN (sensory) was observed in 30.6 and 36.7% in the study and control sides, respectively (McNemar p = 0.25). PN (motor) was observed in 4.1 and 6.1% in the study and control sides, respectively (McNemar p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Surgical glove compression therapy showed no statistically significant effect on the incidence of PTX-induced PN. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry managed by the National University Hospital Council of Japan ( UMIN000027944 ). Registered 26 June 2017.

The significance of biopsy scar excision at the time of skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Neoplastic seeding (NS) can occur after tissue biopsy, which is a clinical issue especially in mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. This is because postoperative radiation is not usually given and local recurrence of preserved skin flap may increase. The purpose of this study is to investigate the importance of preoperative evaluation of NS and the validity of biopsy scar excision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 174 cases of mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. The primary endpoint is the frequency of clinical and pathological NS and the secondary endpoint is the problem of excision of needle biopsy site. RESULTS: Three cases (1.7%) had preoperative clinical findings of NS. Pathological examination revealed NS in all three cases. Biopsy scars could be excised in 115 cases among 171 cases without clinical NS. Pathological NS was found in 1 of 66 (1.5%) cases of which pathological examination was performed. Biopsy scars could not be excised in the remaining 56 cases: the biopsy scar could not be identified in 41 cases, and there was concern about a decrease in flap blood flow after excision in 15 cases. In 12 of these 15 cases, the scars were close to the skin incision; excision of these scars might have triggered skin necrosis between the incision and the biopsy scar excision site. No postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to preoperatively evaluate clinical NS, and biopsy scars should be excised in clinical NS cases. Even in cases without clinical NS, biopsy scar excision should be considered. It is also important to perform a biopsy in consideration of the incision design for reconstructive surgery.

Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy on prognosis in small hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has been previously established. However, significant adverse events related to endocrine therapy cannot be ignored. T1 breast cancer is expected to have a good prognosis. Therefore, adjuvant endocrine therapy for T1a breast cancer patients is controversial. Thus, in this study, we examined the effect of endocrine therapy on the prognosis of T1N0 hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients in each tumor size group, and re-considered the application of endocrine therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively obtained clinical and pathological data from medical records of 7635 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer at Aichi Cancer Hospital between January 2000 and December 2017. The primary end point of our analysis was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end points were distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). The log-rank test, cumulative survival generated curves with Kaplan-Meier methods and the hazard ratio (HR) calculated with a Cox regression model were used to assess the effects of endocrine therapy on prognosis. RESULTS: The 5-year DFS was worse in the non-endocrine therapy (non-ET) group (78%) than the endocrine therapy (ET) group (95%) in the T1c population (p < 0.001, HR 0.25). However, there was no statistically significant difference in DFS between the ET and the non-ET groups in T1a (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.9314, HR 0.94) and T1b (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.1481HR 0.53) breast cancer. The OS, DDFS, and BCSS of the patients also showed that endocrine therapy was associated with improvement of the prognosis in the T1c group, but not in the T1a and T1b groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant endocrine therapy may be essential for T1c breast cancer patients. In contrast, this therapy should be discussed for T1a and T1b luminal breast cancer patients under some circumstances, such as suffering from adverse events.