Pain: a neglected symptom in hemophilia.

Repetitive bleeding attacks may cause joint pain and arthropathy in patients with hemophilia (PWH). Despite being a common symptom, pain is not a well-studied topic in this disease. The aim of this cross-sectional, observational study was to assess the frequency and intensity of pain and analyze the success rates ofpain treatment methods. Adult hemophilia patients were included in the study. The Multidimensional Hemophilia Pain Questionnaire (MHPQ) was used to assess pain. In addition to the MHPQ, demographic data were collected. Fifty adult hemophilia patients were included in the study. Thirty-one (62%) of the patients reported pain due to hemophilia in the last year. Twenty-six of them (81.2%) reported pain during bleeding attacks. The most successful pain coping strategy was clotting factor replacement. None of the participants used opioids or adjuvant analgesics. None of them used a physical therapy modality or interventional pain therapy method. While 67.6% of the patients were very dissatisfied or dissatisfied with their global pain treatment, only 16.1% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied. Patients with higher pain during bleeding episodes were more likely to continue their prophylaxis. There was no significant difference between plasma-derived or recombinant-derived factor prophylaxis in terms of pain complaints. Pain is a frequent and important symptom of hemophilia, but most of the patients are not treated sufficiently. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to improve the life quality of the patients. In addition to successful bleeding prophylaxis, administration of a proper and adequate analgesic regimen and combined physical therapy modalities may decrease pain intensity and prevent the development of arthropathy.

Evaluation of pain in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: A new type of coronavirus outbreak has emerged in China and caused a pandemic. World Health Organization (WHO) announced the official name of this disease 'COVID-19'. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate pain in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Patients who were followed in the ward of an infectious diseases department because of possible or confirmed COVID-19 between May and September of 2020 were included in the study. The Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) was applied. Demographic features, frequency, location, the intensity of pain, and response to analgesics were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 178 participants were included in the study. Ninety-one (51.1%) of patients had pain complaints and the mean pain score (MPS) was 2.28±2.81 over 10. Fifty-nine (56.0%) of participants with pain required analgesic therapy and 41 (80.3%) of them showed ≥50% pain relief with simple analgesics. Twelve of the remaining 18 who did not get enough pain relief with simple analgesic were taking their analgesics pro re nata (PRN) rather than around the clock (ATC). Pain frequency and intensity and mean hospitalization duration (MHD) were similar between confirmed and possible cases. CONCLUSION: Regarding the results, we conclude that pain is not one of the challenging symptoms and easily manageable in patients with a mild-moderate intensity of COVID-19. Our results were not enough to make a correlation between pain and the clinical course of the disease. Further studies are required for the evaluation of pain including patients in intensive care units.

Transforaminal epidural steroid injection and infraneural approach.

Transforaminal epidural steroid injections are a common intervention in the treatment of radicular pain. Complications are rare, but can be catastrophic. One of the potentially devastating complications is occlusion of the artery of Adamkiewicz (AKA). This report is a description of an approach to avoid the complication of injury to the AKA related to transforaminal epidural injection. A 71-year-old male patient presented at the clinic with radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc hernia. A transforaminal epidural steroid injection was planned. After a radiocontrast injection, vascular filling was detected. The needle was repositioned and an inferior entrance to the epidural space was used. No vascularity was seen and dexamethasone was administered to the patient. A transforaminal epidural steroid injection is an effective interventional treatment for radicular pain, but it requires careful attention due to the possible complications. The AKA was located in the upper half of the foramen. Keeping the wide variation in the anatomy of the AKA in mind is very important in order to prevent spinal cord ischemia.

Radiofrequency thermocoagulation combined with pulsed radiofrequency for gasserian ganglion blockage.

OBJECTIVES: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) has been effectively treated by radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) of the gasserian ganglion. Recently, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is becoming an alternative therapy for patients with trigeminal neuralgia. It is unclear whether the combination of RFT with PRF may decrease post-operative complications while maintaining longterm pain relief. METHODS: Twelve patients with idiopathic TN who had undergone combined RFT and PRF of the gasserian ganglion were evaluated. PRF (42 °C, 45V, 20 ms, 120 seconds) was administered, and then RFT (65 °C, 90 seconds) was performed to the gasserian ganglion. The post-operative pain relief and complications were evaluated at 1, 6, 12 and, 24 months after treatment. RESULTS: 10 patients (83.3%) reported significant pain relief (VAS 3) at 1 month following the treatment, while 8 patients (66.6%) at 6 months, 5 patients (41.6) at 12 months, and 2 patients (16.6%) at 24 months were pain-free. Two of the patients did not have pain relief (VAS ≥3), and 2 patients were still pain-free by the 24th month. The mean time of pain relief was 14 months. One patient had numbness in the tongue for about a year, while in the other patients, no serious complications were reported. CONCLUSION: A combination of RFT with PRF could help eliminate postoperative complications of trigeminal neuralgia. We sugesst that combining RFT and PRF therapy may serve to decrease the side effects but not increase the pain relief.

The effects of preadministration of local anesthetic on pulsed radiofrequency

Background/aim: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) has been reported to be a safe and reliable method for the management of a variety of chronic pain syndromes. It is not known whether the preadministration of local anesthetic increases the size of the electrical field. We revealed the effects of administering local anesthetic on PRF and investigated whether they were related to local anesthetic or fluid effects. Materials and methods: Group 1 (n = 18) received PRF to the suprascapular nerve with 1 mL of bupivacaine, group 2 (n = 20) received PRF with 1 mL of physiological saline solution, and group 3 (n = 18) received PRF only. Results: There were significant improvements in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 30 min, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment in group 1 (P < 0.05) and at 1 month and 3 months in groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in VAS scores in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 at 30 min after treatment. Conclusion: PRF applied to the nerve along with local anesthetic may increase pain relief, especially in the early posttreatment period. The favorable effects may depend on the pharmacodynamic features of the local anesthetic .

Pulmonary embolism occurring in a patient treated with spinal cord stimulation.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be an effective method for treating many chronic pain syndromes. In addition, providing pain relief with SCS can reduce immobilization and complications related to immobilization. The present case describes pulmonary embolism (PE) that occurred in patient being treated with SCS for post-laminectomy syndrome. The possibility of PE must be kept in mind while treating patients with SCS.