Cerebral venous thrombosis in adults: a case series of 35 patients from a tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, imaging tests and outcomes, and identify potential prognostic factors in a cohort of patients diagnosed with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center, observational study included adult patients diagnosed with CVT from January 2016 to December 2020. The variables were reviewed using electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included, with a median age at diagnosis of 50.3 (+/- 17.8) years, and the majority being women (74.4%). Nearly 95% of the patients presented at least one risk factor for the development of CVT. Heparins were used for the acute phase in 97.1% of cases, with 75% of those being low molecular weight heparins.During the first two weeks, a compound event (death, intensive care unit admission, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale at discharge >3, CVT recurrence, major bleeding, or the presence of complications) occurred in 28.6% of patients (10 patients).Over the mean follow-up period of 3.3 years, 14.3% of the patients died (with only one death attributed to CVT), one patient experienced major bleeding, and no patients had a recurrence of CVT. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, CVT predominantly affected young women with at least one risk factor for its development. The presence of edema on CT and corticosteroid treatment were associated with a poor short-term prognosis. However, we observed a favorable long-term prognosis in terms of mortality, recurrence, and bleeding.

[Periodic plasmapheresis as maintenance treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, a new therapeutic line? A case report]. / Plasmaféresis periódica como tratamiento de mantenimiento en la esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente, ¿nueva línea terapéutica? A propósito de un caso.

INTRODUCTION: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) treatment has significantly changed in recent years because of the discovery of new molecules that have shown efficacy as maintenance treatment. However, the classical treatment for acute attacks is based on corticosteroids administration, being the periodical plasmapheresis the alternative treatment in the case of refractory patients. We introduce a case of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with a classical acute attacks therapy: plasmapheresis. CASE REPORT: The case of a 39-year-old patient who was diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, postpartum debut and aggresive course, who, after suboptimal response to disease modifying therapies (alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab), receives combination treatment with outpatient periodic plasmapheresis every 3 weeks as maintenance therapy. Good tolerance and response. Clinical stability with this treatment. She has not required new hospital admissions for acute attacks of multiple sclerosis from February 2020 to March 2021. CONCLUSION: Although more specific studies are needed, this case provides information on a potential new maintenance treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis refractory to disease-modifying drug therapies.

TITLE: Plasmaféresis periódica como tratamiento de mantenimiento en la esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente, ¿nueva línea terapéutica? A propósito de un caso.Introducción. El tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente ha evolucionado significativamente en los últimos años con el descubrimiento de nuevas moléculas eficaces como tratamiento de mantenimiento. Por otro lado, el tratamiento de los brotes de esta enfermedad se basa clásicamente en corticoides, y en los casos refractarios a esta terapia se utiliza plasmaféresis. Presentamos un caso de esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente tratada periódicamente con una terapia que se ha utilizado clásicamente para los brotes: plasmaféresis. Caso clínico. Mujer de 39 años con esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente de inicio en el posparto, gran carga lesional y curso agresivo, en quien, ante una respuesta subóptima a terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad (alemtuzumab y ocrelizumab), se decide iniciar un tratamiento combinado junto con plasmaféresis periódicas ambulatorias cada tres semanas como tratamiento de mantenimiento. Se constata una buena tolerancia a esta terapia y evolución, y se produce estabilidad clínica. No ha requerido nuevos ingresos hospitalarios por brotes desde febrero de 2020 a marzo de 2021. Conclusión. Aunque es necesario que se realicen más estudios, este caso ofrece información sobre un potencial tratamiento de mantenimiento para pacientes con esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente refractaria a terapias con fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad.