Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 33(3): 113-8, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15848082

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the gynaecological symptoms of women who have undergone an induced abortion to those who have not. We also compare the gynaecological side effects, in particular the infectious symptoms, following an induced abortion, according to the abortion technique, medical and surgical, in the year after the abortion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A representative sample of 2863 women, aged 18 to 44, was interviewed by telephone between September 2000 and January 2001. Of these women, 401 declared an abortion in the last 5 years. Analysis of the gynaecological side effects according to the abortion technique was performed among the 199 women who terminated their pregnancy before the 8th week of amenorrhoea. RESULTS: Women with a history of induced abortion had a higher sexual risk profile than those with no such history. They also more frequently reported genital infectious symptoms. The comparison between medical and surgical abortions shows that women who had a medical abortion were more likely to report heavy and prolonged bleeding. On the contrary, we found no difference of infectious symptoms between the two techniques. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our study does not support the idea of a reduction of infectious complications related to medical as opposed to surgical abortions. However, given the rapid diffusion of medical abortion, it seems important to carry on the investigations on the side effects related to medical abortions, in order to prevent them if necessary.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Abortivos/efectos adversos , Abortivos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Infecciones/epidemiología , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración/efectos adversos
2.
Acta Paediatr ; 93(10): 1340-5, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15499955

RESUMEN

AIM: To estimate the re-hospitalization rate of extremely preterm children during infancy and associated factors after the recent improvement in survival rates. METHOD: The cohort included all children born before 29 wk of gestation in nine French regions in 1997. All admissions between discharge from initial hospitalization and 9 mo after birth were considered. Factors studied included the child's characteristics at birth and during neonatal hospitalization, risk factors for infection after discharge and parents' socio-demographic characteristics. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for re-hospitalization for all reasons and for respiratory disorders were obtained from logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 376 children, 178 were re-admitted at least once (47.3%; 95% CI: 42.3-52.4). Fifty-five percent of the hospitalized children were admitted at least once for respiratory disorders. The re-hospitalization rate was higher for children who had had chronic lung disease (aOR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.3-3.7), those initially discharged between August and October (aOR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2-5.1) or between November and January (aOR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5-6.8), and children living with other children under six (aOR: 3.4; 95 %CI: 1.6-7.5). Re-hospitalizations were associated with neither gestational age nor the duration of neonatal hospitalization. Adjusted odds ratios for re-hospitalization for respiratory tract disorders were very similar to those for the overall hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Infants born before 29 wk have a very high risk of re-hospitalization. The associated factors can help define high-risk groups at discharge from the neonatal unit who need special surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Prematuro/terapia , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Enfermedades Respiratorias/terapia , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Arch Pediatr ; 10(11): 960-8, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14613689

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of health and social services between children born before 33 weeks (very preterm), children born at 33 or 34 weeks (moderately preterm) and children born at 39 or 40 weeks (full term). POPULATION AND METHODS: All very preterm children born in 1997 in nine French regions and a representative sample of the two other groups were followed up since birth. Data on the use of services between discharge from initial neonatal hospitalisation and the 9 months after birth were obtained by mail questionnaire filled in by parents. RESULTS: 38.2% of very preterm children, 24.3% of moderately preterm children and 10.3% of full term children were admitted to hospital at least once. Respiratory tract disorder was the main reason for rehospitalisation of very preterm children. The total number of visits, visits to specialists, and chest therapy were more frequent among very preterm children than among the two other groups. CONCLUSION: Medical care of very preterm children is intensive after discharge from initial neonatal hospitalisation. Need of services are also substantial for moderately preterm children.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Servicio Social , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Francia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Enfermedades Respiratorias/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA