Thromboelastography-Guided Correction of Coagulopathy Before Tunneled Central Venous Access in Critically Ill Patients With Liver Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Importance: Optimal blood product transfusion strategies before tunneled central venous catheter (CVC) placement are required in critically ill coagulopathic patients with liver disease to reduce exposure to allogeneic blood products and mitigate bleeding and thrombotic complications. Objectives: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a thromboelastography-guided transfusion strategy for the correction of coagulopathy in patients with liver disease compared with a conventional transfusion strategy (using international normalized ratio, platelet count, and fibrinogen) before tunneled CVC insertion. Design Setting and Participants: A retrospective propensity score-matched single-center cohort study was conducted at a quaternary care academic medical center involving 364 patients with liver disease (cirrhosis and acute liver failure) who underwent tunneled CVC insertion in the ICU. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether they received blood product transfusions based on a thromboelastography-guided or conventional transfusion strategy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes that were evaluated included the volume, units and cost of blood products (fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, and platelets) when using a thromboelastography-guided or conventional approach to blood transfusions. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of procedure-related bleeding and thrombotic complications. Results: The total number of units/volume/cost of fresh frozen plasma (12 U/3,000 mL/$684 vs. 32 U/7,500 mL/$1,824 [p = 0.019]), cryoprecipitate (60 U/1,500 mL/$3,240 vs. 250 U/6,250 mL/$13,500 [p < 0.001]), and platelets (5 U/1,500 mL/$2,610 vs. 13 units/3,900 mL/$6,786 [p = 0.046]) transfused were significantly lower in the thromboelastography-guided transfusion group than in the conventional transfusion group. No differences in the frequency of bleeding/thrombotic events were observed between the two groups. Conclusions and Relevance: A thromboelastography-guided transfusion strategy for correction of coagulopathy in critically ill patients with liver disease before tunneled CVC insertion, compared with a conventional transfusion strategy, reduces unnecessary exposure to allogeneic blood products and associated costs without increasing the risk for peri-procedural bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Fluid loading during the hemodynamic evaluation of pulmonary hypertension: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Compensated pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) may be difficult to identify based on resting hemodynamics. Fluid challenge is commonly used to unmask occult PH-LHD. We sought to determine the hemodynamic effect of fluid loading and its association with the clinical pretest probability of PH-LHD. Methods: We included consecutive patients evaluated for PH who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) with fluid challenge at Cleveland Clinic between April 2013 and January 2019. We obtained hemodynamic measurements at rest and after intravenous rapid fluid challenge (500 mL of normal saline). We calculated the pretest probability of PH-LHD based on the 6th World Symposium on PH proceedings. For statistical analyses we used t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Chi-square, paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and linear regression as indicated. Results: We included 174 patients with mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 63.7±13.0 years and 123 (71%) of female sex. Baseline pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) was 11±5 mmHg, with a PAWP/cardiac output (CO) ratio of 2.1±1.1 Wood units (WU). The absolute increase in PAWP and PAWP/CO was 6.9±3.6 mmHg and 1.06±0.91 WU, respectively. The change in PAWP was inversely associated with baseline PAWP (P<0.001). The PAWP with fluids was >18 mmHg in 81% of the patients with baseline PAWP 13-15 mmHg. We found no strong associations between the change in PAWP, PAWP/CO or right atrial pressure to pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ratio (RAP/PAWP) and the pretest probability of PH-LHD. Conclusions: The absolute change in PAWP, PAWP/CO, or achieving a PAWP >18 mmHg with rapid fluid loading was not robustly associated with the pretest probability of PH-LHD. Patients with PAWP between 13-15 mmHg commonly had a positive fluid challenge, questioning the utility of this intervention in these patients.

Impact of Esophageal Pressure Measurement on Pulmonary Hypertension Diagnosis in Patients With Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Elevated intrathoracic pressure could affect pulmonary vascular pressure measurements and influence pulmonary hypertension (PH) diagnosis and classification. Esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement adjusts for the increase in intrathoracic pressure, better reflecting the pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with obesity. RESEARCH QUESTION: In individuals with obesity, what is the impact of adjusting pulmonary hemodynamic determinations for Pes on PH diagnosis and classification? Can Pes be estimated by positional or respiratory hemodynamic changes? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we included patients with obesity who underwent right heart catheterization and demonstrated elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP; ≥ 12 mm Hg). After placement of an esophageal balloon, we performed pressure determination using an air-filled transducer connected to a regular hemodynamic monitor. We measured pulmonary pressures changes when sitting and the variations during the respiratory cycle. RESULTS: We included 53 patients (mean ± SD age, 59 ± 12 years; mean ± SD BMI, 44.4 ± 10.2 kg/m2). Supine end-expiratory pressures revealed a mean pulmonary artery pressure of > 20 mm Hg in all patients and a PAWP of >15 mm Hg in most patients (n = 50). The Pes adjustment led to a significant decrease in percentage of patients with postcapillary PH (from 60% to 8%) and combined precapillary and postcapillary PH (from 34% to 11%), at the expense of an increase in percentage of patients with no PH (0% to 23%), isolated precapillary PH (2% to 25%), and undifferentiated PH (4% to 34%). INTERPRETATION: Adjusting pulmonary hemodynamics for Pes in patients with obesity leads to a pronounced reduction in the number of patients who receive a diagnosis of postcapillary PH. Measuring Pes should be considered in patients with obesity, particularly those with elevated PAWP.

Effect of pulmonary artery catheter balloon inflation on pulmonary hemodynamics.

Background: Right heart catheterization (RHC), including a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) determination, is necessary to categorize the hemodynamic type of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The potential hemodynamic implications of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) balloon inflation in PH have not been formally tested. Methods: We assessed the hemodynamic impact of the PAC balloon inflation during RHC by measuring systolic, diastolic, and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) in all patients, and cardiac output (CO) by thermodilution in a subgroup of patients. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained both with PAC balloon deflated and fully inflated (1.5 mL of air), while the PAC was free floating in the pulmonary artery before wedging. We calculated total pulmonary resistance (TPR). Results: We included 210 patients, age 58±14 years, 134 (64%) women. Patients had no PH (n: 12, 6%), PH group 1 (n: 68, 33%), 2 (n: 86, 41%), 3 (n: 11, 5%), 4 (n: 29, 14%), and 5 (n: 3, 1%). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) at end-expiration mPAP (balloon-up minus down) (n: 209) was -0.02±1.59 mmHg (range, -5.0 to 4.0 mmHg; P=0.84), while the TPR (n: 62) was -0.27±1.2 Wood units (WU) (range, -4.8 to 2.2 WU; P=0.08); without significant variation based on the type of PH group or degree of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Interestingly, the change in mPAP at end-expiration with PAC balloon inflation was higher in women (mean ± SD: 0.31±1.43 mmHg) than men (mean ± SD: -0.61±1.70 mmHg) (P<0.001). Conclusions: Balloon inflation of the PAC in the main pulmonary artery had no significant impact on the mPAP or TPR, even when only including patients with group 1 PH or selecting a subgroup with a higher PVR.

Right heart catheterization for pulmonary hypertension during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Right heart catheterization is an essential diagnostic modality in the evaluation of pulmonary hypertension. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in deferral of elective procedures including right heart catheterization. The benefits of proceeding with right heart catheterization, such as further characterization of hemodynamic subtype and severity of pulmonary hypertension, initiation of targeted pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy, as well as further hemodynamic testing, need to be carefully balanced with the risk of potentially exposing both patients and health care personnel to coronavirus disease 2019 infection. This review article aims to provide best clinical practices for safely performing right heart catheterization in pulmonary hypertension patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.