Preoperative CT Indices Predict Nonreach Before IPAA.

BACKGROUND: IPAA aims to restore continence to patients after total proctocolectomy. However, some patients have inadequate small-bowel mesenteric length to achieve reconstruction. No preoperative risk stratification tools of native anatomy exist. OBJECTIVE: We report CT-guided measurements of anatomic landmarks to predict nonreach before IPAA. DESIGN: This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of a prospective database. SETTING: This study was conducted at Cedars-Sinai between January 2007 and December 2021. PATIENTS: Patients with IBD undergoing a 2- or 3-stage IPAA with a preoperative abdominal CT using either an enterography protocol or IV contrast sufficient to visualize mesenteric vasculature were included in the study. CT mesenteric indices were assessed, including total length (representing length required for the pouch to reach the anal canal), mesenteric length (inherent length of small-bowel mesentery), and mobilization length (the difference between total length and mesenteric length). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was IPAA nonreach. The secondary outcomes were association of clinical variables and CT mesenteric indices. RESULTS: Six of 59 patients (10%) experienced nonreach. Mobilization length was longer in the nonreach group by 5.8 cm ( p = 0.01), and mesenteric length was shorter by 3.5 cm ( p = 0.04). Mobilization length ≥17 cm provided 100% sensitivity and 69% specificity (OR 1.46, area under the curve 0.84, p = 0.004) for nonreach. Similarly, a mesenteric length <14.6 cm demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 49% specificity for IPAA nonreach (area under the curve 0.75, p = 0.03). LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature of the study precluded a standardized imaging protocol. External validation will be required because of the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based measurements of length, specifically mesenteric and mobilization length, predict nonreach before IPAA. This method is noninvasive, readily available, and may be useful for preoperative patient counseling and operative planning. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C140 . LOS NDICES DE TOMOGRAFA COMPUTARIZADA PREOPERATORIA PREDICEN LA AUSENCIA DE ALCANCE ANTES DE LA ANASTOMOSIS DEL RESERVORIO ILEALANAL: ANTECEDENTES:La anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal tiene como objetivo restaurar la continencia en los pacientes después de una proctocolectomía total. Sin embargo, algunos pacientes tienen una longitud mesentérica del intestino delgado inadecuada para lograr la reconstrucción. No existen herramientas de estratificación del riesgo preoperatorio de la anatomía nativa.OBJETIVO:Informamos mediciones guiadas por tomografía computarizada de puntos de referencia anatómicos para predecir la falta de alcance antes de la anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio.DISEÑO:Este es un análisis retrospectivo de una sola institución de una base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en Cedars-Sinai entre Enero de 2007 y Diciembre de 2021.PACIENTES:Pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal que se someten a una anastomosis anal con reservorio ileal en 2 o 3 etapas con una tomografía computarizada abdominal preoperatoria utilizando un protocolo de enterografía o contraste intravenoso suficiente para visualizar la vasculatura mesentérica. Se evaluaron los índices mesentéricos de tomografía computarizada, incluida la longitud total (que representa la longitud requerida para que la bolsa alcance el canal anal), la longitud mesentérica (longitud inherente del mesenterio del intestino delgado) y la longitud de movilización (la diferencia entre la longitud total y la longitud mesentérica).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue falta de alcance de la anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal. Los resultados secundarios fueron la asociación de variables clínicas y los índices mesentéricos de tomografía computarizada.RESULTADOS:Seis de 59 (10%) pacientes experimentaron falta de alcance. La longitud de movilización fue mayor en el grupo sin alcance en 5,8 cm ( p = 0,01) y la longitud mesentérica fue menor en 3,5 cm ( p = 0,04). La longitud de movilización ≥17 cm proporcionó una sensibilidad del 100% y una especificidad del 69% (OR 1,46, AUC 0,84, p = 0,004) para la falta de alcance. De manera similar, una longitud mesentérica <14,6 cm demostró una sensibilidad del 100% y una especificidad del 49% para la falta de alcance de la anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal (AUC 0,75, p = 0,03).LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio impidió un protocolo de imágenes estandarizado. Se requerirá una validación externa debido al pequeño tamaño de la muestra.CONCLUSIONES:Las mediciones de longitud basadas en tomografía computarizada, específicamente la longitud mesentérica y de movilización, predicen la falta de alcance antes de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileo. Este método no es invasivo, está fácilmente disponible y puede ser útil para el asesoramiento preoperatorio del paciente y la planificación quirúrgica. Consulte el Video Resumen en https://links.lww.com/DCR/C140 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Decreased Hospital Length of Stay for ICH and PE after Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Radiological Worklist Triage System.

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference in the length of stay (LOS) for inpatients diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or pulmonary embolism (PE) prior to and following implementation of an (AI) triage software. A retrospective review was performed for patients that underwent CT imaging procedures related to ICH and PE from April 2016 to October 2019. All patient encounters that included noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) or CT chest angiogram (CTCA) procedures, identified by the DICOM study descriptions, from April 2016 to April 2019 were included for ICH and PE, respectively. All patients that were diagnosed with ICH or PE were identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes. Three separate control groups were defined as follows: (i) all remaining patients that underwent the designated imaging studies, (ii) patients diagnosed with hip fractures, and (iii) all hospital wide encounters, during the study period. Pre-AI and post-AI time periods were defined around the deployment dates of the ICH and PE modules, respectively. The reduction in LOS was 1.30 days (95% C.I. 0.1-2.5), resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 11.9% (p value = 0.032), for ICH and 2.07 days (95% C.I. 0.1-4.0), resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 26.3% (p value = 0.034), for PE when comparing the pre-AI and post-AI time periods. Reductions in LOS were observed in the ICH pre-AI and post-AI time period group for patients that were not diagnosed with ICH, but that underwent related imaging, 0.46 days (95% C.I. 0.1-0.8) resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 5% (p value = 0.018), and inpatients that were diagnosed with hip fractures, 0.60 days (95% C.I. 0.1-1.2) resulting in an observed percentage decrease of 8.3% (p value = 0.004). No other significant decrease in length of stay was observed in any of the other patient groups. The introduction of computer-aided triage and prioritization software into the radiological workflow was associated with a significant decrease in length of stay for patients diagnosed with ICH and PE.