RESUMEN
Atopic Dermatitis (AD), recognized as one of the most prevalent chronic inflammatory skin disorders among children, is characterized by skin barrier dysfunction and immune system abnormalities. Historically viewed as a childhood condition, recent findings underscore a notable prevalence of AD in adults, prompting a critical examination of this demographic. Diagnosis hinges largely on subjective clinical assessments due to the absence of universally accepted biomarkers. Consequently, efforts are underway to identify dependable biomarkers to enhance diagnostic precision. This paper underscores the scarcity of AD diagnoses in adults despite its pediatric prominence, emphasizing the need for heightened awareness and tailored diagnostic approaches in adult populations. Severity scores such as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and dermatological life quality index (DLQI) play pivotal roles in evaluating disease severity and its impact on quality of life, guiding the development of personalized treatment strategies for adult AD patients. In this study, we aim to present four compelling cases of adult-onset atopic dermatitis, each offering unique insights into this increasingly recognized phenomenon. What makes these cases particularly noteworthy is the absence of any prior atopic history in two out of four patients, challenging the conventional understanding of AD as a condition predominantly linked to childhood. Moreover, the clinical presentation in all four cases was markedly atypical, underscoring the elusive nature of adult-onset AD diagnosis. In our investigation, interleukin 4 (IL-4), interleukin 13 (IL-13), and Immunoglobulin E (IgE) were utilized as diagnostic biomarkers for our patient cohort. Given the established pivotal roles of IL-4 and IL-13 in AD pathogenesis, elevated serum levels of these biomarkers, although not universally endorsed, hold potential for diagnostic utility. Furthermore, heightened levels of IgE, indicative of allergic responses and inflammation inherent to the condition, emphasize its significance as a key biomarker and therapeutic target in AD management.
RESUMEN
Significant gaps remain in the understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of fibromyalgia (FM), and the COVID-19 pandemic has introduced even more unknowns. Social factors specific to that period, the viral infection itself, and/or vaccination are additional elements that can complicate the progression of the disease or the response to treatment. Aim: The primary hypothesis to be evaluated in this study is that an acute COVID-19 infection, even when considered recovered, may induce changes in the response to non-pharmacological treatment in FM patients, particularly concerning pain. Results: We included 128 patients diagnosed with FM before the pandemic began. The patients were divided based on their history of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination status. All patients followed the same rehabilitation program (cognitive therapy, kinesitherapy). Perceived pain: The non-COVID-19 patient groups showed a statistically significant reduction in pain at the final evaluation compared to patients with a history of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (p < 0.001). Algometric evaluation: Patients without COVID-19 infection and that were vaccinated exhibited the best improvement in pain threshold, both across evaluation times (p < 0.001) and compared to any of the other three groups studied (p < 0.001). Using the WHYMPI questionnaire, the same group of patients (those not having experienced acute COVID-19 and who were vaccinated) was the only group with a statistically significant improvement in pain severity (p = 0.009). In conclusion, to control and improve FM pain symptoms, in addition to appropriate medication, we propose paying additional attention to the history of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 vaccination status.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are many aesthetic treatments aimed at combating aging. In the most common and frequently used ones there are often side effects, albeit minor ones. However, sometimes it is necessary to use medications before or after treatments. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the anti-aging efficacy and application safety of a therapy based on the combination of vacuum and electromagnetic fields (EMFs). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the aesthetic effects of the treatment on 217 subjects. Before treatment (T0) and after the last session (T1), skin hydration levels, the amount of sebum present and the pH were measured. The presence of discomfort during the sessions and side effects at T1 was verified. At T1, the levels of satisfaction of the patients and of the doctors who performed the treatment were assessed. At 3 and 6 months of follow-up the aesthetic results were re-evaluated. RESULTS: For all treated subjects, an evident qualitative improvement was observed in the quality of the skin of the neck and face, with an increase in tone and a reduction in wrinkles. The instrumental tests highlighted a normalization of skin hydration, pH, and sebum values. High levels of satisfaction at T0 and good stability of results up to 6 months of follow-up were reported. No discomfort was referred during the treatment sessions, nor any side effects after the entire treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment that exploits the synergy between vacuum and EMFs is very promising given the effectiveness and safety of the technique.
RESUMEN
Dupilumab is the only available biological treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Even so, limited clinical data regarding its safety profile are available. Interactions with other drugs and the adverse effects of Dupilumab on patients with multiple comorbidities, such as chronic heart disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, etc., are not known yet. Moreover, there have been described cases of cutaneous lymphomas induced by Dupilumab. Therefore, the clinician that wants to start treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, which does not respond to conventional drugs, might be reluctant to choose biologic agents such as Dupilumab. In this paper, we reported a case of severe atopic dermatitis with multiple comorbidities in which the patient was successfully treated with Dupilumab despite numerous underlying conditions. We also conducted a review of the current literature on the safety profile of Dupilumab in special categories of patients with comorbidities, such as heart, kidney, and liver disease, oncologic conditions, and during pregnancy.