[COVID-19 and adenovirus vaccines: French experience of enhanced pharmacovigilance]. / COVID-19 et vaccins à adénovirus : expérience française de suivi renforcé de pharmacovigilance.

As part of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products and all 31 regional pharmacovigilance centers were mobilized in an exceptional reinforced vaccine pharmacovigilance surveillance system. Concerning adenovirus vaccines, Vaxzévria® and Jcovden®, this national system, based on the daily analysis of notified cases of adverse events, has allowed the early identification of safety signals, some of which have been validated, others still under analysis, common to mRNA vaccines or more specific of adenovirus vaccines such as Vaccine Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia. Complementing european and international actions, this follow-up has contributed to a better definition of the safety profile of these vaccines and has led to redefine the vaccine strategy in our country. Although today these two vaccines have no longer place in the national vaccine strategy, they are still used in other countries, where the experience acquired could be useful and will contribute to fuel the reflection on future therapies involving viral vectors.

Impact of Glucocorticoid Use in Oncology in the Immunotherapy Era.

Thanks to their anti-inflammatory, anti-oedema, and anti-allergy properties, glucocorticoids are among the most widely prescribed drugs in patients with cancer. The indications for glucocorticoid use are very wide and varied in the context of cancer and include the symptomatic management of cancer-related symptoms (compression, pain, oedema, altered general state) but also prevention or treatment of common side effects of anti-cancer therapies (nausea, allergies, etc.) or immune-related adverse events (irAE). In this review, we first give an overview of the different clinical situations where glucocorticoids are used in oncology. Next, we describe the current state of knowledge regarding the effects of these molecules on immune response, in particular anti-tumour response, and we summarize available data evaluating how these effects may interfere with the efficacy of immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Therapeutic Associations Comprising Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in Breast Cancer: Clinical Challenges and Perspectives.

Despite a few cases of long-responder patients, immunotherapy with anti-PD-(L)1 has so far proved rather disappointing in monotherapy in metastatic breast cancer, prompting the use of synergistic therapeutic combinations incorporating immunotherapy by immune-checkpoint inhibitors. In addition, a better understanding of both the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to immunotherapy, as well as the immunological effects of the usual treatments for breast cancer, make it possible to rationally consider this type of therapeutic combination. For several years, certain treatments, commonly used to treat patients with breast cancer, have shown that in addition to their direct cytotoxic effects, they may have an impact on the tumor immune microenvironment, by increasing the antigenicity and/or immunogenicity of a "cold" tumor, targeting the immunosuppressive microenvironment or counteracting the immune-exclusion profile. This review focuses on preclinical immunologic synergic mechanisms of various standard therapeutic approaches with anti-PD-(L)1, and discusses the potential clinical use of anti-PD-1/L1 combinations in metastatic or early breast cancer.

Correction: Prognostic and predictive role of CD8 and PD-L1 determination in lung tumor tissue of patients under anti-PD-1 therapy.

Since the publication of this paper, the authors noticed that Corentin Richard was not credited as contributing equally to the paper. He should be considered as a joint first author with Jean-David Fumet.

Anti-MEK and Anti-EGFR mAbs in RAS-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Case Series and Rationale.

KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene) or BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) constitutive activation leads to anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) therapy resistance of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. In this article we investigate the effects of anti-MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) antibody (trametinib) combined with anti-EGFR (cetuximab) on colon cancer cell lines with different RAS statuses. Even though cetuximab has no effect on RAS cell viability and ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase) phosphorylation (one of the last kinases of the EGFR pathway), trametinib can induce cell death and inhibit the activation of ERK alone or in combination with cetuximab. In a more pathologic context, we observed that KRAS colon cancer patient biopsies treated ex vivo with trametinib and cetuximab also present less ERK phosphorylation. Finally, nine ovarian, endometrial and colon cancer patients with different KRAS statuses were treated with anti-EGFR/anti-MEK combination off label after molecular tumor board decision. KRAS exon 2 patients have significantly longer PFS (progression-free survival) than with previous lines of treatments. We believe that such observations provide a rationale for designing a clinical trial to test this association in RAS exon 2 mutated cancers.

Exome Analysis Reveals Genomic Markers Associated with Better Efficacy of Nivolumab in Lung Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only one-quarter of patients benefit from these new therapies. PD-L1 assessment and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are available tools to optimize use of checkpoint inhibitors but novel tools are needed. Exome sequencing could generate many variables but their role in identifying predictors of response is unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed somatic and constitutional exome analyses for 77 patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab. We studied: one-tumor-related characteristics: aneuploidy, CNA clonality, mutational signatures, TMB, mutations in WNT, AKT, MAPK, and DNA repair pathways, and two-immunologic characteristics: number of intratumoral TCR clones, HLA types, and number of neoantigens; and six clinical parameters. RESULTS: A high TMB per Mb, a high number of neoantigens, mutational signatures 1A and 1B, mutations in DNA repair pathways, and a low number of TCR clones are associated with greater PFS. Using a LASSO method, we established an exome-based model with nine exome parameters that could discriminate patients with good or poor PFS (P < 0.0001) and overall survival (P = 0.002). This model shows better ability to predict outcomes compared with a PD-L1 clinical model with or without TMB. It was externally validated on two cohorts of patients with NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab or with nivolumab and ipilimumab as well as in urothelial tumors treated with atezolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, these data provide a validated biomarker that predicts the efficacy of nivolumab or pembrolizumab in patients with NSCLC. Our biomarker seems to be superior to PD-L1 labeling and TMB models.

RAS status and neoadjuvant chemotherapy impact CD8+ cells and tumor HLA class I expression in liver metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: T lymphocytes and HLA expression on tumor cell both influence prognostic of localized colorectal cancer, but their role following chemotherapy in patients with liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was not addressed. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients treated in curative intend of liver mCRC were included in this retrospective study. Patients were either untreated or treated with neoadjuvant therapy containing an anti-EGFR, bevacizumab or oxaliplatin. Immune densities were quantified in the tumor core and in invasive margin of metastases, using Qupath software or a pathologist's quantification. CD8, NKp46, Foxp3, CD163, HLA, PD-L1 were analyzed and were correlated with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: In the whole cohort only a high CD8+ cells infiltrate, a high HLA-I expression and wild-type RAS/RAF status were associated with a better overall survival in both univariate and multivariate model. Moreover, CD8+ cells immune infiltrate at invasive margin combined to HLA expression in cancer cell could increase patient's outcome prediction. RAS status but not immune cell infiltrate was associated with HLA expression on tumor cells. In comparison to untreated patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy induced CD8+ cells recruitment and increased PD-L1 staining in immune infiltrates only for WT RAS patients. In this context, anti-EGFR and oxaliplatin based chemotherapy are the most powerful to induce CD8+ cells mobilization within the metastatic site. CONCLUSIONS: While CD8 infiltrate and HLA expression appear to be prognostic for mCRC, CD8 and PD-L1 infiltrate are enhanced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in mCRC under RAS status dependence.

Prognostic and predictive role of CD8 and PD-L1 determination in lung tumor tissue of patients under anti-PD-1 therapy.

BACKGROUND: No study has evaluated the predictive and prognostic role of CD8 and PD-L1 coexpression in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We analyzed RNA sequencing and/or immunohistochemistry staining in NSCLC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 1016), and 34 metastatic NSCLC samples not treated by immunotherapy as prognostic cohorts. As predictive aspect of CD8 and PD-L1, we used 85 NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1. Two validation cohorts were used including 44 NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1 and an external cohort with different tumor types. RESULTS: In prognostic cohorts, high CD8A expression was associated with longer OS (p = 0.02), while high CD274 mRNA was associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.05). In predictive cohort, high CD8 expression and CD8A mRNA were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.0002). There was no significant association between PD-L1 expression and PFS while high CD274 mRNA was associated with longer PFS (p = 0.009). A combination of CD8A and CD274 was highly predictive of outcome. These results were confirmed in the validation cohorts. This two-genes signature demonstrated similar results compared to gold standard signatures. CONCLUSION: CD8 represents both a prognostic and predictive factor of outcomes, while PD-L1 share different prognostic and predictive roles.