RESUMEN
This study aimed to analyze cases of anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap used for hand reconstruction with terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis. Patients who underwent ALT free flap placement with terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis for hand reconstruction between January 2011 and August 2021 were included. The number, length, and diameter of the perforators and veins, flap size, and operative time were investigated through a retrospective review of charts and photographs. The occurrences of arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, arterial spasm, and flap necrosis were analyzed. In total, 50 patients were included in this study. The mean diameter and length of the perforators were 0.68 mm and 3.25 cm, respectively, and the mean number of veins anastomosed was 1.88, with a mean diameter of 0.54 mm. Complications included four cases of arterial thrombosis, one case of venous thrombosis, seven cases of partial necrosis, and one case of total flap failure. Regression analysis showed that a longer perforator was associated with arterial thrombosis whereas larger flap size and number of anastomosed veins were associated with partial necrosis ( p < 0.05). The terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis offers advantages in using compact free flaps with short pedicle lengths to cover small hand defects.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the feasibility of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) in the treatment of benign gynecologic diseases and to determine the selection criteria for each technique. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical records review of 168 patients who underwent TLH or LAVH performed by one surgeon. A chi-square test was used to compare the difference between the TLH and LAVH groups. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated for the relationship between the clinico-demographic factors of the patients. RESULTS: There were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to age, parity, history of abdominal delivery, body mass index, and indication for hysterectomy. The operative time was similar between the 2 groups (P>.99). The uterine weight was greater in the LAVH group compared to the TLH group (P<.01). Ten patients were converted from TLH to LAVH, because of a large uterus and/or a lower segmental mass on the uterus, making it difficult to expose the Koh cup rim contour. CONCLUSIONS: TLH and LAVH are safe, feasible methods by which to perform a hysterectomy. LAVH is preferred in patients with a mass involving the lower segment or a relatively large uterus.