SYNAPSES. A European observational study to evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of safinamide in routine clinical practice: post-hoc analysis of the Spanish study population. / SYNAPSES. Estudio observacional europeo para evaluar la seguridad y la efectividad de la safinamida en la práctica clínica habitual: análisis post hoc de la población española del estudio.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a progressive age-related neurodegenerative condition requiring new therapeutic alternatives. Safinamide, a novel levodopa add-on therapy, positively affects disease fluctuations by modulating both dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems. To further investigate the use of safinamide in European routine clinical practice, the present post-hoc analysis aimed to understand safinamide's safety profile within the Spanish study population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred eleven Spanish patients with PD were evaluated at baseline, four (±1), eight (±1), and 12 (±1) months after initiating safinamide treatment. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score and UPDRS part III score during on time were used to measure the overall severity of PD and motor complications, respectively, while the severity of adverse events was evaluated following the investigators' criteria. RESULTS: Safinamide showed a favourable safety profile within the Spanish study population, although prescription to patients with psychiatric conditions and off-label use were more frequent than in the European study population. In Spain, clinically meaningful improvements were observed in UPDRS scores when safinamide was used as the only add-on therapy to levodopa (57.4% and 53.7% of patients) and when switching from rasagiline (55.1% of patients). Motor complications were reduced from 83.2% to 63.3% after the study period. Increased safety concerns were undetected in any patient subgroup, although patients with cognitive impairment showed a slightly higher frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This subanalysis further supports safinamide use as a safe and efficacious option for the management of motor fluctuations in different subgroups of levodopa-treated patients. However, safinamide should be used with caution in patients with cognitive impairment.

TITLE: SYNAPSES. Estudio observacional europeo para evaluar la seguridad y la efectividad de la safinamida en la práctica clínica habitual: análisis post hoc de la población española del estudio.Introducción. La enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) es una enfermedad neurodegenerativa progresiva relacionada con la edad que requiere nuevas alternativas terapéuticas. La safinamida, un nuevo tratamiento add-on a la levodopa, afecta positivamente a las fluctuaciones de esta enfermedad al modular los sistemas dopaminérgico y glutamatérgico. Para investigar más a fondo el uso de la safinamida en la práctica clínica rutinaria europea, el presente análisis post hoc tiene como objetivo comprender el perfil de seguridad de la safinamida dentro de la población española del estudio. Pacientes y métodos. Se evaluó a 511 pacientes españoles con EP al inicio, cuatro (±1), ocho (±1) y 12 (±1) meses después de iniciar el tratamiento con safinamida. Se utilizaron la puntuación total de la escala unificada de puntuación de la enfermedad de Parkinson (UPDRS) y la puntuación de la UPDRS III, durante el tiempo en on para medir la gravedad general de la EP y las complicaciones motoras, respectivamente, mientras que la gravedad de los acontecimientos adversos se evaluó siguiendo los criterios de los investigadores. Resultados. La safinamida mostró un perfil de seguridad favorable en la población española del estudio, aunque la prescripción a pacientes con enfermedades psiquiátricas y el uso para indicaciones no autorizadas fueron más frecuentes que en la población europea del estudio. En España se observaron mejoras clínicamente significativas en las puntuaciones de la UPDRS cuando se utilizó la safinamida como único tratamiento add-on a la levodopa (el 57,4 y el 53,7% de los pacientes) y cuando se venía de administrar rasagilina (el 55,1% de los pacientes). Las complicaciones motoras se redujeron del 83,2 al 63,3% tras el período de estudio. No se detectaron mayores problemas de seguridad en ningún subgrupo de pacientes, aunque los pacientes con deterioro cognitivo mostraron una frecuencia algo superior de acontecimientos adversos. Conclusiones. Este subanálisis respalda el uso de la safinamida como opción segura y eficaz para el tratamiento de las fluctuaciones motoras en diferentes subgrupos de pacientes tratados con levodopa. Sin embargo, la safinamida debe utilizarse con precaución en pacientes con deterioro cognitivo.

Palliative care management in patients with Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders in Spain. National survey of neurologists.

INTRODUCTION: Palliative care in neurodegenerative diseases is useful but underused. The objective of this study is to know how palliative care (PC) is applied in Spain in order to identify limitations and unmet needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study, anonymous survey type of 20 questions, directed and answered by neurologists dedicated to movement disorders (MD) in Spain. RESULTS: 58 responses were obtained from neurologists from 15 autonomous communities. 69% answered that they did not have a specialised MD nursing facility but did have a PC team in their centre (81%). No specific protocol for PC in MD was identified. All except one neurologist stated that they lacked sufficient training in PC, the main training need being the "advance directives explanation". Only 1 in 4 neurologists answered routinely explaining advance healthcare planning to their patients, recognising up to 84.5% of neurologists not knowing how to assess the patient's competence. 60.3% of those surveyed answered that between 10% and 30% of their patients would be candidates for PC, although 1 in 3 said they were not clear when to refer the patient to PC. 100% of neurologists affirmed the priority need to implement PC protocols in MD. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a formative deficit in PC in this area and in the care of the patient with movement disorders and their environment, and should serve as a starting point to develop consensual care protocols.

Analysis of stroke care resources in Spain in 2012: have we benefitted from the Spanish Health System's stroke care strategy?

INTRODUCTION: The Spanish Health System's stroke care strategy (EISNS) is a consensus statement that was drawn up by various government bodies and scientific societies with the aim of improving quality throughout the care process and ensuring equality among regions. Our objective is to analyse existing healthcare resources and establish whether they have met EISNS targets. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The survey on available resources was conducted by a committee of neurologists representing each of Spain's regions; the same committee also conducted the survey of 2008. The items included were the number of stroke units (SU), their resources (monitoring, neurologists on call 24h/7d, nurse ratio, protocols), SU bed ratio/100,000 inhabitants, diagnostic resources (cardiac and cerebral arterial ultrasound, advanced neuroimaging), performing iv thrombolysis, neurovascular interventional radiology (neuro VIR), surgery for malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarctions and telemedicine availability. RESULTS: We included data from 136 hospitals and found 45 Stroke Units distributed unequally among regions. The ratio of SU beds to residents ranged from 1/74,000 to 1/1,037,000 inhabitants; only the regions of Cantabria and Navarre met the target. Neurologists performed 3,237 intravenous thrombolysis procedures in 83 hospitals; thrombolysis procedures compared to the total of ischaemic strokes yielded percentages ranging from 0.3 to 33.7%. Hospitals without SUs showed varying levels of available resources. Neuro VIR is performed in every region except La Rioja, and VIR is only available on a 24h/7 d basis in 17 cities. Surgery for malignant MCA infarction is performed in 46 hospitals, and 5 have telemedicine. CONCLUSION: Stroke care has improved in terms of numbers of participating hospitals, the increased use of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular procedures, and surgery for malignant MCA infarction. Implementation of SUs and telemedicine remain insufficient. The availability of diagnostic resources is good in most SUs and irregular in other hospitals. Regional governments should strive to ensure better care and territorial equality, which would achieve the EISNS objectives.

Health care resources for stroke patients in Spain, 2010: analysis of a national survey by the Cerebrovascular Diseases Study Group.

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is currently a major social health problem. For this reason, the Spanish Ministry of Health approved the Stroke National Strategy (SNS) in 2008 to improve the prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of stroke patients. This plan intends to guarantee 24-hour, 365-days neurological assistance in the whole country by the end of 2010. Our aim was to analyse the situation of stroke assistance in Spain in 2009. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A committee of neurologists practicing in the different autonomous communities (AC), and who had not participated in the preparation of the SNS, was created. A national survey was performed including the number of stroke units (SU) and their characteristics (monitoring, 24-h/7-day on-call neurology service, nursing staff ratio and the use of protocols), bed ratio of SU/100,000 people, availability of intravenous thrombolysis therapy, neurovascular intervention (NI) and telemedicine. RESULTS: We included data from 145 hospitals. There are 39 SU in Spain, unevenly distributed. The ratio between SU bed/number of people/AC varied from 1/75,000 to 1/1,037,000 inhabitants; Navarra and Cantabria met the goal. Intravenous thrombolysis therapy is used in 80 hospitals; the number of treatments per AC was between 7 and 536 in 2008. NI was performed in the 63% of the AC, with a total of 28 qualified hospitals (although only 1 hospital performed it 24h, 7 days a week in 2009). There were 3 hospitals offering clinical telemedicine services. CONCLUSIONS: Assistance for stroke patients has improved in Spain compared to previous years, but there are still some important differences between the AC that must be eliminated to achieve the objectives of the SNS.