Transforming global health: decoloniality and the human condition.

The field of global health is at a pivotal moment of transformation. Decoloniality has emerged as a critical framework to assess and transform the pathologies that mark the field. These pathologies include the inequitable sharing of resources, the power hierarchies that entrench decision-making in institutions largely based in North America and Europe and the general predisposition towards paternalistic and exploitative interactions and exchange between North and South. The energy being generated around this transformative moment is widening circles of participation in the discourse on what transformation should look like in the field. The importance of decoloniality cannot be overstated in driving the transformative agenda. At the same time, the popularity of decoloniality as a critical framework may risk omissions in our understanding of the origins of injustice and the pathways to a new global health. To complement the work being done to decolonise global health, I illustrate how the 'human condition' intersects with the transformative agenda. By human condition, I mean the universal features of humanity that lead to oppression and those that lead to cooperation, unity and a shared humanity.

Tobacco policy (in)coherence in Mozambique: an examination of national and subnational stakeholder perspectives.

Mozambique ranks fifth on the list of tobacco producing countries in Africa, while also being a Party to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Tobacco farming is regarded by some governments as a strategic economic commodity for export and remains deeply entrenched within Mozambique's political and economic landscape. This study uses a qualitative description methodology to identify tensions, conflicts and alignment or misalignment in policy on tobacco across government sectors and levels in Mozambique. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 33 key informants from sectors across national and subnational levels including health, agriculture, economic and commercial sectors, as well as non-state actors from civil society organizations, the tobacco industry, farmers unions and associations and individual farmers. Incoherence was present across sectoral mandates, perspectives on industry's presence in the country and regions and between FCTC provisions and informant perceptions of tobacco production as a development strategy. Despite tobacco being viewed as an important economic commodity by many informants, there was also widespread dissatisfaction with tobacco from both farmers and some government officials. There were indications of an openness to shifting to a policy that emphasizes alternatives to tobacco growing. The findings also illustrate where points of convergence exist across sectors and where opportunities for aligning tobacco policy with the provisions of the FCTC can occur.

Assessing the Level of Poverty and Utilization of Government Social Programs Among Tobacco Farmers in Indonesia.

INTRODUCTION: Studies examining profit suggest that former tobacco farmers do as well or better than current tobacco farmers. Research has yet to examine the relationship among current and former tobacco farmers, poverty, and receipt of government social assistance. This type of research is critical to understanding the direct and indirect subsidization of tobacco growing. This study analyzed tobacco farmers' poverty levels and receipt of government social assistance programs. AIMS AND METHODS: We designed and conducted an original four-wave economic survey of current and former tobacco farming households in Indonesia between 2016 and 2022. We then used descriptive analysis and probit regression for panel data to estimate the relationship between tobacco farming and poverty status. RESULTS: Tobacco farmers' per capita income and poverty rates vary across years. The poverty rate was significantly higher in the year with a higher-than-normal rainfall as it negatively affected farming outcomes. During this year, the poverty rate among current tobacco farmers was also higher than that of former tobacco farmers. Regression estimates from the panel data confirm the association between tobacco farming and the likelihood of being poor. We also found a high share of current tobacco farmers who receive government social assistance programs, such as cash transfer programs and a universal healthcare program. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show high poverty rates-particularly during bad farming years-and high rates of government social assistance among tobacco farmers. The high rates of government assistance among tobacco farmers living in poverty show that the government is indirectly subsidizing the tobacco industry.

Addressing tobacco industry influence in tobacco-growing countries.

Protecting policy-making from tobacco industry influence is central to effective tobacco control governance. The inclusion of industry actors as stakeholders in policy processes remains a crucial avenue to corporate influence. This influence is reinforced by the idea that the tobacco industry is a legitimate partner to government in regulatory governance. Addressing the influence of the tobacco industry demands a focus on the government institutions that formalize relationships between industry and policy-makers. Industry involvement in government institutions is particularly relevant in tobacco-growing countries, where sectors of government actively support tobacco as an economic commodity. In this paper, we discuss how controlling tobacco industry influence requires unique consideration in tobacco-growing countries. In these countries, there is a diverse array of companies that support tobacco production, including suppliers of seeds, equipment and chemicals, as well as transportation, leaf buying and processing, and manufacturing companies. The range of companies that operate in these contexts is particular and so is their engagement within political institutions. For governments wanting to support alternatives to tobacco growing (Article 17 of the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control), we illustrate how implementing Article 5.3, aimed at protecting tobacco control policies from tobacco industry interference, is fundamental in these countries. Integrating Article 5.3 with Article 17 will (i) strengthen policy coherence, ensuring that alternative livelihood policies are not undermined by tobacco industry interference; (ii) foster cross-sector collaboration addressing both tobacco industry interference and livelihood development; and (iii) enhance accountability and transparency in tobacco control efforts.

Éviter que l'élaboration de politiques soit influencée par l'industrie du tabac est essentiel pour assurer une gestion efficace de la lutte antitabac. L'inclusion d'acteurs de l'industrie comme parties prenantes des processus législatifs demeure l'un des principaux leviers employés par les sociétés. Cette influence est renforcée par l'idée que l'industrie du tabac constitue un partenaire légitime du gouvernement dans le domaine de la gouvernance réglementaire. Pour lutter contre l'ingérence du secteur, il faut se concentrer sur les institutions gouvernementales qui officialisent les relations entre l'industrie et les responsables politiques. L'implication de l'industrie dans les institutions publiques est surtout observée dans les pays producteurs de tabac, où certains niveaux de gouvernement soutiennent activement le tabac en tant que bien économique. Dans le présent document, nous abordons le fait qu'une lutte contre l'influence de l'industrie du tabac requiert une attention particulière dans les pays producteurs, où un large éventail d'entreprises encouragent la production de tabac: approvisionnement en semences, équipements et produits chimiques, mais aussi transport, achat des feuilles, transformation et fabrication. La variété des entreprises œuvrant dans de tels contextes est spécifique, tout comme leur engagement au sein des organes politiques. Pour les gouvernements qui souhaitent privilégier les alternatives à la production de tabac (selon l'article 17 de la Convention-cadre pour la lutte antitabac), nous montrons à quel point l'application de l'article 5.3, qui vise à protéger les politiques de lutte antitabac contre l'ingérence de l'industrie, est fondamentale dans ces pays. Intégrer l'article 5.3 dans l'article 17 permettra (i) de renforcer la cohérence des politiques en vigueur, afin que les politiques relatives à des activités de remplacement ne soient pas contrecarrées par l'industrie du tabac; (ii) de favoriser la collaboration entre les secteurs pour lutter contre l'influence de l'industrie tout en développant des moyens de subsistance; et enfin, (iii) d'accroître la responsabilisation et la transparence dans les efforts menés dans la lutte antitabac.

Proteger la formulación de políticas contra la influencia de la industria tabacalera es fundamental para una gobernanza eficaz del control del tabaco. La inclusión de los actores de la industria como partes interesadas en los procesos políticos sigue siendo una vía crucial para la influencia corporativa. Esta influencia se ve reforzada por la idea de que la industria tabacalera es un asociado legítimo del gobierno en la gobernanza reglamentaria. La lucha contra la influencia de la industria tabacalera exige centrarse en las instituciones gubernamentales que formalizan las relaciones entre la industria y los responsables de formular políticas. La participación de la industria en las instituciones gubernamentales es especialmente relevante en los países productores de tabaco, donde algunos sectores del gobierno apoyan activamente el tabaco como un bien económico. En este documento, se analiza cómo el control de la influencia de la industria tabacalera requiere una consideración especial en los países productores de tabaco. En estos países, existe una gran variedad de empresas que apoyan la producción de tabaco, incluidos los proveedores de semillas, equipos y productos químicos, así como las empresas de transporte, de compra de hojas y de procesamiento y fabricación. La variedad de empresas que operan en estos contextos es particular y también lo es su compromiso dentro de las instituciones políticas. Para los gobiernos que desean apoyar alternativas al cultivo de tabaco (es decir, el artículo 17 del Convenio Marco para el Control del Tabaco), se ilustra cómo la aplicación del artículo 5.3, destinado a proteger las políticas de control del tabaco de la interferencia del tabaco, es fundamental en estos países. La integración del artículo 5.3 con el artículo 17 (i) reforzará la coherencia política, asegurando que las políticas de medios de vida alternativos no se vean perjudicadas por la interferencia de la industria tabacalera; (ii) fomentará la colaboración intersectorial al abordar tanto la interferencia de la industria tabacalera como el desarrollo de los medios de vida; y (iii) mejorará la rendición de cuentas y la transparencia en los esfuerzos de control del tabaco.

A conceituação das ameaças ao controle do tabaco provenientes de acordos econômicos internacionais: a experiência brasileira / La conceptualización de las amenazas al control del tabaco provenientes de acuerdos económicos internacionales: la experiencia brasileña / Conceptualizing threats to tobacco control from international economic agreements: the Brazilian experience

Resumo: Com base nos resultados de dezenas de entrevistas com atores-chave envolvidos na formulação de políticas de controle do tabaco, examinamos as percepções desses atores em relação a ameaças ao controle do tabaco provenientes de políticas econômicas internacionais (comerciais e de investimento). Adotando uma perspectiva jurídica, avaliamos também as ameaças existentes e desafios potenciais que as políticas econômicas podem apresentar para os esforços do governo brasileiro na defesa da saúde pública. Segundo nossos achados, a maioria dos atores não percebe tais políticas econômicas como uma grande ameaça ao controle do tabaco. Objetivamente, de fato existem algumas ameaças. Por exemplo, a tentativa do Brasil de proibir a maioria dos aditivos e saborizantes do tabaco ainda enfrenta resistência na Organização Mundial do Comércio.

Resumen: En base a los resultados de decenas de entrevistas con actores-clave, involucrados en la formulación de políticas de control al tabaco, examinamos las percepciones de estos actores, en relación con las amenazas al control del tabaco, provenientes de políticas económicas internacionales (comerciales y de inversión). Adoptando una perspectiva jurídica, evaluamos también las amenazas existentes y desafíos potenciales que las políticas económicas pueden presentar para los esfuerzos del gobierno brasileño en la defensa de la salud pública. Según nuestros hallazgos, la mayoría de los actores no percibe tales políticas económicas como una gran amenaza al control del tabaco. Objetivamente, de hecho, existen algunas amenazas. Por ejemplo, la tentativa de Brasil de prohibir la mayoría de los aditivos y saborizantes del tabaco enfrenta incluso resistencia en el seno de la Organización Mundial del Comercio.

Abstract: Using the results of dozens of interviews with key actors involved in tobacco control policymaking, we examine these actors' perceptions of threats to tobacco control policy efforts from international economic policies on trade and investment. We also evaluate, from a legal perspective, the genuine threats that exist or potential challenges that economic policies may pose to the Brazilian government's public health efforts. We find that most actors did not perceive these economic policies as a major threat to tobacco control. Objectively, we found that some threats do exist. For example, Brazil's attempt to ban most tobacco additives and flavorings continues to met resistance at the World Trade Organization.

As instituições e a implementação do controle do tabaco no Brasil / Instituciones y la implementación del control del tabaco en Brasil / Institutions and the implementation of tobacco control in Brazil

Resumo: Esta pesquisa examina as características institucionais da Comissão Nacional para a Implementação da Convenção-Quadro sobre Controle do Tabaco (CONICQ) e como essas características institucionais facilitaram e impediram sua capacidade de promover o controle intersetorial do tabagismo. Os autores avaliam particularmente as características da CONICQ enquanto um dos principais fatores de mudanças e melhorias nas primeiras políticas de controle do tabaco, e que ajudaram a transformar o Brasil em líder mundial nessa área. O artigo também analisa como a Comissão evoluiu junto com a melhora do controle do tabaco, além de discutir alguns dos maiores desafios para reunir diversos setores do governo na elaboração de políticas de saúde pública.

Resumen: Esta investigación examina las características institucionales de la Comisión Nacional para la Implementación del Convenio Marco para el Control del Tabaco (CONICQ) y cómo estas características institucionales han facilitado y dificultado su capacidad de fomentar el control intersectorial del tabaco en Brasil. En particular, evaluamos las características clave institucionales de la CONICQ, cuando era uno de los agentes clave de cambios y mejoras en las primeras políticas de control de tabaco, que ayudaron a hacer de Brasil un líder mundial en esta área. También examinamos cómo el comité ha evolucionado al mejorar el control del tabaco y, particularmente, elucidar algunos de los mayores desafíos a los que se enfrenta para aunar sectores gubernamentales a menudo dispares, con el fin de generar políticas de públicas de salud.

Abstract: This research examines the institutional features of Brazil's National Commission for the Implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (CONICQ) and how these institutional features have facilitated and hindered its ability to foster intersectoral tobacco control. In particular, we evaluate the key institutional features of CONICQ starting from when it was one of the key drivers of change and improvements in early tobacco control policies, which helped to make Brazil a world leader in this area. We also examine how the committee has evolved, as tobacco control has improved and particularly elucidate some of the major challenges that it faces to bring together often disparate government sectors to generate public health policies.