Comparing Postoperative Urinary Retention Rates Between Robotic Apical Prolapse Repairs.

IMPORTANCE: Understanding the risk of urinary retention with different prolapse repair surgical procedures is important for perioperative counseling. OBJECTIVE: The study compared postoperative urinary retention rates between robotic sacrocolpopexy and robotic uterosacral ligament suspension. STUDY DESIGN: This institutional review board-exempt retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent pelvic organ prolapse repair with robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSCP) and robotic uterosacral ligament suspension (RUSLS) between June 2018 and March 2022. Our primary outcome was the rate of acute postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in these groups. Secondary outcomes were the number of days needed to resolve urinary retention and persistent voiding dysfunction. RESULTS: Out of 298 patients, 258 underwent RSCP and 40 underwent RUSLS. Acute POUR was found in 73 patients (24%): 46 patients (18%) in the RSCP group versus 26 patients (65%) in the RUSLS group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significantly higher rate of acute POUR after RUSLS (odds ratio [OR] = 17.92, confidence interval [CI] = 3.06-104.86; P = 0.001). Patients with an elevated preoperative postvoid residual volume >100 mL or concomitant midurethral sling were more likely to develop POUR (OR = 2.93, CI = 1.43-5.98; P = 0.003 and OR = 2.19, CI = 1.16-4.14; P = 0.016, respectively). While patients with higher parity were less likely to have urinary retention (OR = 0.71, CI = 0.53-0.96; P = 0.024), age, body mass index, prolapse stage, and concurrent posterior repair did not affect the urinary retention rate significantly. The number of days needed to resolve POUR and persistent voiding dysfunction were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Acute POUR appears more likely to develop after RUSLS compared to RSCP. Elevated preoperative postvoid residual volume and concomitant midurethral sling surgery independently increase the risk of POUR.

The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining representative abortion incidence estimates is challenging in restrictive contexts. While the confidante method has been increasingly used to collect this data in such settings, there are several biases commonly associated with this method. Further, there are significant variations in how researchers have implemented the method and assessed/adjusted for potential biases, limiting the comparability and interpretation of existing estimates. This study presents a standardized approach to analyzing confidante method data, generates comparable abortion incidence estimates from previously published studies and recommends standards for reporting bias assessments and adjustments for future confidante method studies. METHODS: We used data from previous applications of the confidante method in Côte d'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Ghana, Java (Indonesia), Nigeria, Uganda, and Rajasthan (India). We estimated one-year induced abortion incidence rates for confidantes in each context, attempting to adjust for selection, reporting and transmission bias in a standardized manner. FINDINGS: In each setting, majority of the foundational confidante method assumptions were violated. Adjusting for transmission bias using self-reported abortions consistently yielded the highest incidence estimates compared with other published approaches. Differences in analytic decisions and bias assessments resulted in the incidence estimates from our standardized analysis varying widely from originally published rates. INTERPRETATION: We recommend that future studies clearly state which biases were assessed, if associated assumptions were violated, and how violations were adjusted for. This will improve the utility of confidante method estimates for national-level decision making and as inputs for global or regional model-based estimates of abortion.

An Application of the Confidante Method to Estimate Induced Abortion Incidence in Java, Indonesia.

CONTEXT: Induced abortion is legally restricted and highly stigmatized in Indonesia, and is thus extremely difficult to measure. Indirect methods leveraging women's social networks, such as the Confidante Method, have shown promise in estimating hidden behaviors, including abortion, in similar settings. METHODS: A community-based survey was conducted among 8,696 women aged 15-49 in Java, Indonesia, in November 2018-January 2019. Data were collected via in-person interviews with respondents about their own abortions and those of up to three of their closest confidantes. One-year induced abortion incidence rates per 1,000 women were estimated using a direct-report approach and the Confidante Method. RESULTS: The direct-report abortion rate was 3.4 per 1,000 women in 2018, compared with the Confidante Method rate of 11.3 per 1,000. Among the confidantes of women who reported an abortion in the past five years, the abortion rate was 42.0 per 1,000. Half of the women reported that they had no confidantes with whom they shared private information. Among women reporting an abortion and at least one confidante, 58% had disclosed their abortion to their confidante, indicating that substantial transmission bias was present. CONCLUSIONS: The Confidante Method relies on several assumptions that did not hold in this study. Although the method performed better than the direct-report approach, it underestimated the incidence of abortion in Java. More research is needed to understand how abortion-related information is shared within social networks and to assess the appropriateness of applying the Confidante Method to estimate abortion in a given context.

RESUMEN Contexto: El aborto inducido está restringido legalmente y sumamente estigmatizado en Indonesia y, por lo tanto, es extremadamente difícil de medir. Los métodos indirectos que aprovechan las redes sociales de mujeres, como el método basado en confidentes, han demostrado ser promisorios para estimar comportamientos que se ocultan, incluido el aborto, en entornos similares. Métodos: Entre noviembre de 2018 y enero de 2019, se llevó a cabo una encuesta basada en la comunidad entre 8,696 mujeres en edades de 15 a 49 años en Java, Indonesia. Se recolectaron datos a través de entrevistas presenciales con personas sobre sus propios abortos y los de hasta tres de sus confidentes más cercanas. Se estimaron tasas anuales de incidencia de aborto inducido por 1,000 mujeres mediante el uso del enfoque de informe directo y del método basado en confidentes. Resultados: La tasa de aborto por informe directo fue de 3.4 por 1,000 mujeres en 2018, en comparación con la tasa del método basado en confidentes de 11.3 por 1,000. Entre las personas confidentes de mujeres que reportaron haber tenido un aborto en los últimos cinco años, la tasa de aborto fue de 42.0 por 1,000. La mitad de las mujeres reportaron que no tenían confidentes con quienes compartir su información privada. Entre las mujeres que reportaron haber tenido un aborto y tener al menos una persona confidente, el 58% habían revelado su aborto a su confidente, lo que indica que hubo un importante sesgo de transmisión. Conclusiones: El método basado en confidentes depende de varias suposiciones que no fueron aplicables en este estudio. Aunque el método funcionó mejor que el enfoque de informe directo, subestimó la incidencia del aborto en Java. Es necesario realizar más investigación para comprender la forma en que la información relacionada con el aborto se comparte dentro de las redes sociales, así como para determinar qué tan apropiado es aplicar el método basado en confidentes para estimar la incidencia del aborto en un contexto determinado.

RÉSUMÉ Contexte: L'avortement provoqué est limité par la loi et fait l'objet d'une forte stigmatisation en Indonésie. Il est par conséquent extrêmement difficile d'en mesurer l'incidence. Les méthodes indirectes tirant parti des réseaux sociaux des femmes, comme celle de la « confidente ¼, se sont révélées prometteuses dans l'estimation de comportements cachés, notamment l'avortement, dans des contextes comparables. Méthodes: Une enquête communautaire a été menée auprès de 8 696 femmes âgées de 15 à 49 ans à Java (Indonésie) entre novembre 2018 et janvier 2019. Les données ont été collectées dans le cadre d'entretiens personnels avec les répondantes, concernant leurs propres avortements et ceux d'un maximum de trois de leurs confidentes les plus proches. Les taux d'incidence de l'avortement provoqué d'une année pour 1 000 femmes ont été estimés selon une approche de déclaration directe et par la méthode de la confidente. Résultats: Le taux d'avortement estimé par déclaration directe s'est avéré de 3,4 pour 1 000 femmes en 2018, par rapport à 11,3 pour 1 000 selon la méthode de la confidente. Parmi les confidentes des femmes ayant déclaré un avortement durant les cinq dernières années, le taux s'élevait à 42,0 pour 1 000. La moitié des femmes ont déclaré ne pas avoir de confidentes avec lesquelles elles partageaient une information privée. Parmi les femmes déclarant un avortement et au moins une confidente, 58% avaient divulgué leur avortement à leur confidente, indiquant un biais de transmission considérable. Conclusions: La méthode de la confidente repose sur plusieurs hypothèses non confirmées dans cette étude. Bien qu'ayant produit de meilleurs résultats que l'approche par déclaration directe, elle sous-estime l'incidence de l'avortement à Java. Il convient d'approfondir la recherche pour comprendre les modalités du partage de l'information relative à l'avortement au sein des réseaux sociaux et pour évaluer la pertinence du recours à la méthode de la confidente pour estimer l'incidence de l'avortement dans un contexte donné.

Characteristics of Immigrants Obtaining Abortions and Comparison with U.S.-Born Individuals.

Background: Little information exists about individuals born outside of the United States who seek abortion services from U.S.-based providers. Baseline data are necessary to identify future changes in the profile of this population. Materials and Methods: Using the Guttmacher Institute's Abortion Patient Survey, we pooled two national samples of individuals obtaining abortions from 2008-2009 to 2013-2014 to provide data on 17,873 respondents, 16% of whom were immigrants. We estimated the distribution of immigrant and U.S.-born respondents across demographic and circumstantial characteristics such as age, poverty level, and gestational age at abortion. We compared the distribution of characteristics by nativity status using chi-square tests. Results: The majority of immigrants obtaining abortions were in their 20s (51%), had poverty-level (50%) or near poverty-level incomes (23%), and had graduated from high school (78%). Almost half (45%) were uninsured and a similar proportion had been in the United States for less than 10 years (44%); nearly one-quarter completed their survey in Spanish. Compared with U.S.-born respondents, a larger proportion of immigrants were older, uninsured, and had not completed high school. A smaller proportion of immigrants compared with nonimmigrants had their abortions after 12 weeks (8% vs. 11%) or traveled over 50 miles to obtain their abortion (9% vs. 16%). Conclusions: Particularly with the continued rise in both restrictive abortion and immigration policies in the United States, it is critical to monitor how immigrants' use of and access to abortion services are impacted in the changing environment. Ensuring that policies and clinical practices facilitate abortion access for immigrants will serve to better support the reproductive health needs of all women.

Data Opportunities for Studying the Sexual and Reproductive Health of Immigrants in the United States.

This paper aims to identify, review, and evaluate publicly available national- and local-level data sources that collect information on the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of immigrants in the United States. We review public-use sources from the last 30 years that include information on immigration, SRH, health service utilization, and race/ethnicity. For each source, we evaluated the strengths and challenges of the study design and content as they relate to studying immigrant SRH. We identified and reviewed 22 national and seven local sources. At the national level, the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health and the National Survey of Family Growth contained the most information; at the local level, the New York City Community Health Survey was the most robust. These sources present opportunities to advance research, improve public health surveillance, and inform policies and programs related to the SRH of this rapidly growing and often underserved population.

Challenges to implementing national comprehensive sexuality education curricula in low- and middle-income countries: Case studies of Ghana, Kenya, Peru and Guatemala.

School-based comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) can help adolescents achieve their full potential and realize their sexual and reproductive health and rights. This is particularly pressing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where high rates of unintended pregnancy and STIs among adolescents can limit countries' ability to capitalize on the demographic dividend. While many LMICs have developed CSE curricula, their full implementation is often hindered by challenges around program planning and roll-out at the national and local level. A better understanding of these barriers, and similarities and differences across countries, can help devise strategies to improve implementation; yet few studies have examined these barriers. This paper analyzes the challenges to the implementation of national CSE curricula in four LMICs: Ghana, Kenya, Peru and Guatemala. It presents qualitative findings from in-depth interviews with central and local government officials, civil society representatives, and community level stakeholders ranging from religious leaders to youth representatives. Qualitative findings are complemented by quantitative results from surveys of principals, teachers who teach CSE topics, and students aged 15-17 in a representative sample of 60-80 secondary schools distributed across three regions in each country, for a total of around 3000 students per country. Challenges encountered were strikingly similar across countries. Program planning-related challenges included insufficient and piecemeal funding for CSE; lack of coordination of the various efforts by central and local government, NGOs and development partners; and inadequate systems for monitoring and evaluating teachers and students on CSE. Curriculum implementation-related challenges included inadequate weight given to CSE when integrated into other subjects, insufficient adaptation of the curriculum to local contexts, and limited stakeholder participation in curriculum development. While challenges were similar across countries, the strategies used to overcome them were different, and offer useful lessons to improve implementation for these and other low- and middle-income countries facing similar challenges.