Development of Prognostic Indicator Based on Autophagy-Related lncRNA Analysis in Colon Adenocarcinoma.

There were no systematic researches about autophagy-related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) signatures to predict the survival of patients with colon adenocarcinoma. It was necessary to set up corresponding autophagy-related lncRNA signatures. The expression profiles of lncRNAs which contained 480 colon adenocarcinoma samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The coexpression network of lncRNAs and autophagy-related genes was utilized to select autophagy-related lncRNAs. The lncRNAs were further screened using univariate Cox regression. In addition, Lasso regression and multivariate Cox regression were used to develop an autophagy-related lncRNA signature. A risk score based on the signature was established, and Cox regression was used to test whether it was an independent prognostic factor. The functional enrichment of autophagy-related lncRNAs was visualized using Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Ten prognostic autophagy-related lncRNAs (AC027307.2, AC068580.3, AL138756.1, CD27-AS1, EIF3J-DT, LINC01011, LINC01063, LINC02381, AC073896.3, and SNHG16) were identified to be significantly different, which made up an autophagy-related lncRNA signature. The signature divided patients with colon adenocarcinoma into the low-risk group and the high-risk group. A risk score based on the signature was a significantly independent factor for the patients with colon adenocarcinoma (HR = 1.088, 95%CI = 1.057 - 1.120; P < 0.001). Additionally, the ten lncRNAs were significantly enriched in autophagy process, metabolism, and tumor classical pathways. In conclusion, the ten autophagy-related lncRNAs and their signature might be molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the patients with colon adenocarcinoma.

Efficacy and safety of bifid triple viable plus aminosalicylic acid for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative colitis (UC), one of the most stubborn diseases, is mainly treated by aminosalicylic acid (ASA). However, the side effects of ASA include vomiting, nausea, rash, diarrhea, headache, etc, which seriously affect life-quality of UC patients. Probiotics such as bifid triple viable (BTV) could reduce drug-induced adverse reactions and has a good clinical effect on UC. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of BTV plus ASA in treating UC. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched from the inception dates to October 12, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included by comparing BTV plus ASA programs with ASA alone in patients with UC. Methodological quality was assessed by 2 independent researchers according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by using the Review Manager 5.3 Software. Risk ratios (RRs), 95% confidence interval (CI), and standardized mean difference were calculated. RESULTS: Sixty RCTs involving 4954 participants were selected for final review. Compared with ASA, BTV plus ASA significantly improved the clinical effect rate [RR = 1.23, 95% CI (1.20, 1.26), P < .00001]; reduced the relapse rate [RR = 0.34, 95% CI (0.18, 0.62), P = .0005]; and adverse effect rate [RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.53, 0.82), P = .0002]. Compared with the controls, levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, C-reactive protein (CRP), hypersensitive CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and malondialdehyde were reduced; levels of IL-10, CD3+, CD4+, and superoxide dismutase were increased in BTV plus ASA group. CONCLUSIONS: BTV plus ASA has positive therapeutic effects on UC, and it might be a safe way to treat UC. However, comprehensive clinical trials are needed to obtain high level of clinical evidence.

A meta-analysis of the association between the presence of Helicobacter pylori and periodontal diseases.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association between the presence of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) and periodontal disease (PD). METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify eligible articles published from inception up to April 2018. Further articles were retrieved through a manual search of recent reviews. Cross-sectional studies, case-control studies and cohort studies reporting the association between H pylori and PD were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Four case-control studies and nine cross-sectional studies were included. A total of 6800 patients were included in this review. The odds for oral H pylori positivity was 2.31 times (95% CI: 1.99-2.68) greater than those without H pylori. Subgroup analyses involving different study locations, designs, and types of study population showed the similar results. The pooled OR for the gastric disease patients was the largest (3.50, 95% CI: 2.22-5.53, five articles). Stomach H pylori was also significantly associated with PD, with OR 2.90 (95% CI: 1.37-6.14, two articles). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports an association between H pylori and PD. More well-designed studies, especially prospective cohort studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Prognostic Value of NRAS Gene for Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: NRAS gene is associated with malignant proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC). But its prognostic value on CRC is still unknown. The objective of this study is to perform a meta-analysis to obtain its prognostic value on survival of CRC patients. Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis was designed, undertaken and reported using items from the PRISMA statement. Relevant articles were identified through PubMed (containing Medline), Embase, Web of Science databases and Google scholar search engines from their inception up to October 3, 2016. The articles about NRAS on prognosis of CRC patients were enrolled. The association between NRAS and CRC survival time (including overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], and disease-free survival [DFS]) was evaluated using hazard ratio (HR) with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of fifteen articles were included. High-expression of NRAS was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.15­1.61), and poor PFS (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.04­2.94). The combined HR of NRAS on DFS was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.37­2.03). Subgroup analysis showed that NRAS was significantly associated with poor OS for patients from Western countries (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09­1.73), but not for those from Asian countries. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrate that NRAS gene could predict the poor prognosis for the CRC patients. More large-sample cohort studies are needed to further confirm this conclusion.

Prognostic Value of Mismatch Repair Genes for Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis.

DNA mismatch repair was proposed to play a pivotal role in the development and prognosis of colorectal cancer. However, the prognostic value of mismatch repair on colorectal cancer is still unknown. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched. The articles about mismatch repair (including hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6, hPMSH1, and hPMSH2) deficiency for the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study. The hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval were used to measure the impact of mismatch repair deficiency on survival time. Twenty-one articles were included. The combined hazard ratio for mismatch repair deficiency on overall survival was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.69) and that on disease-free survival was 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.75). In subgroup analysis, there were a significant association between overall survival and mismatch repair deficiency in Asian studies (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.91) and Western studies (hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.67). For disease-free survival, the hazard ratios in Asian studies and Western studies were 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.81) and 0.62 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.78), respectively. Our meta-analysis indicated that mismatch repair could be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

Efficacy and safety of Kangfuxin liquid combined with aminosalicylic acid for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Kangfuxin liquid (KFXL) combined with aminosalicylic acid (ASA) in treating ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, Wan fang, the Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of KFXL combined with ASA for UC from the inception dates to March 3, 2017. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality according to the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software (RevMan, Version 5.3, Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014), and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool. RESULTS: A total of 39 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3204 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared with ASA alone, KFXL combined with ASA significantly improved the clinical effectiveness rate [RR = 1.19, 95% CI: (1.16, 1.23), P < .00001], reduced the relapse rate [RR = 0.26, 95% CI: (0.18, 0.38), P < .00001], reduced the inflammation factor levels of TNF-a, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and C-reactive protein, reduced the coagulation index of fibrinogen, increased the coagulation index of prothrombin time, and mean platelet volume, and reduced the clinical symptoms of abdominal pain, diarrhoea, pus and bloody stool, and tenesmus. However, KFXL combined with ASA did not increase the adverse event incidence [RR = 0.74, 95% CI (0.42, 1.32), P = .31], and no severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: KFXL combined with ASA has good therapeutic effect for UC and might be a safe approach in managing UC. More high-quality, multicenter randomized, double-blind trials with a large sample size are required to generate a high level of clinical evidence.