Impact of Discontinuing Both Hypertonic Saline and Dornase Alfa After Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis.

Rationale Evaluating approaches to reduce treatment burden is a research priority among people with CF (pwCF) on highly effective modulators including elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). Objective To evaluate the impact of discontinuing both hypertonic saline (HS) and dornase alfa (DA) versus continuing both therapies among a subgroup of participants in the SIMPLIFY study who sequentially participated in trials evaluating the independent clinical effects of discontinuing HS and DA. Methods SIMPLIFY participants ≥12 years old on ETI and comprising a subgroup using both HS and DA at study entry were randomized to the HS or DA trial, and then randomized 1:1 to continue or discontinue the applicable therapy for 6 weeks. After completion of the first trial, eligible participants could enroll in the second trial beginning with a 2-week run in. Study outcomes were compared across the duration of SIMPLIFY participation between a cohort remaining on both therapies during SIMPLIFY versus a cohort that sequentially discontinued both as a result of trial randomizations. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate treatment differences, adjusted for time between trials, trial order, baseline age, sex at birth and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) at study entry. Results There were 43 participants who discontinued both therapies by the end of SIMPLIFY and 63 who remained on both, with overall average ppFEV1 at study entry 96.7% and average duration of follow up from beginning of the first trial to completion of the second trial 3.9 months, including time between trials. No clinically meaningful difference in the change in ppFEV1 from baseline to completion of the second trial was observed between those who discontinued versus remained on both therapies (difference: 0.22% Off-On, 95% CI: -1.60,2.03). Changes in LCI2.5, patient reported, and safety outcomes were also comparable. Patient reported treatment burden, as measured by a CFQ-R subscale, significantly decreased in those discontinuing both therapies. Conclusions SIMPLIFY participants who sequentially discontinued both HS and DA experienced no meaningful changes in clinical outcomes and reported decreased treatment burden as compared to those who remained on both therapies. These data continue to inform a new era of post-modulator care of pwCF.

Efficacy and safety of LAU-7b in a Phase 2 trial in adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Lung inflammation is associated with tissue damage in cystic fibrosis (CF). LAU-7b, a novel oral drug candidate, was shown to control inflammation and stabilize CFTR protein in the epithelial membrane during inflammatory stress in preclinical models of CF. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of LAU-7b in adults with CF. LAU-7b or placebo was administered over 24 weeks as six 21-day treatment cycles each separated by 7 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the absolute change from baseline in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) at 24 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 166 subjects received at least one dose of study drug (Intent-To-Treat population, ITT), of which 122 received ≥5 treatment cycles (Per-Protocol population, PP). Both treatment arms showed a mean lung function loss at 24 weeks of 1.18 ppFEV1 points with LAU-7b and 1.95 ppFEV1 with placebo, a 0.77 ppFEV1 (40 s) difference, p=0.345, and a 0.95 ppFEV1 (49 %) difference in the same direction in PP population, p=0.263. Primary analysis of mean ppFEV1 through 24 weeks showed differences of 1.01 and 1.23 ppFEV1, in the ITT (65 % less loss, p=0.067) and PP populations (78 % less loss, reaching statistical significance p=0.049), respectively. LAU-7b had an acceptable safety profile. CONCLUSION: Although the study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint in the ITT population, LAU-7b was generally well tolerated and showed evidence of preservation of lung function to support further development.

Predicting weight gain in patients with cystic fibrosis on triple combination modulator.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations producing dysfunctional CFTR proteins leading to progressive clinical disease. Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) remarkably improves lung disease but is associated with substantial weight gain. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a single-center longitudinal study predicting 6-month weight gain after ETI initiation. We used linear mixed effects modeling (LME) to determine association of ETI treatment with changing body mass index (BMI). Using linear regression, we examined BMI prediction models with distinct combinations of main effects to identify a model useful for patient counseling. We used up to eight commonly observed clinical characteristics as input variables (age, sex, percent predicted FEV1 [FEV1%], F508del homozygous state, pancreatic sufficiency, HgbA1c, prior modulator use and prior year number of pulmonary exacerbations). RESULTS: We evaluated 154 patients (19-73 years old, 54% female, FEV1% = 19-121, 0-6 prior year pulmonary exacerbations). LME demonstrated an association between ETI use and weight increases. Exhaustive testing suggested a parsimonious linear regression model well-fitted to data that is potentially useful for counseling. The two variable model shows that on average, BMI decreases by 0.045 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] = -0.069 to -0.021, p < 0.001) for every year of age and increases by 0.322 (CI = 0.142 to 0.502, p = 0.001) for each additional prior year exacerbation at the time of ETI initiation. INTERPRETATION: Young patients with many prior year pulmonary exacerbations likely have the largest 6 month weight gain after starting ETI.

A comparison of aminoglycoside antibiotic serum concentrations collected by peripheral veins and peripherally inserted central catheters in adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: People with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) are frequently hospitalized for treatment of pulmonary exacerbation. The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Pulmonary Guidelines support the use of intravenous aminoglycosides with therapeutic drug monitoring for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbation due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Serum intravenous tobramycin concentrations are commonly collected by peripheral venipuncture (PV). Discomfort associated with collection of samples by PV prompts collection via PICC, but the accuracy of intravenous tobramycin serum levels collected by PICC has not been documented in adult PwCF. The primary study objective was to evaluate the difference between intravenous tobramycin serum levels collected by PV and PICC in adult PwCF. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective case-control study of adult PwCF admitted to University of Utah Health for a pulmonary exacerbation receiving tobramycin by a single lumen PICC. The authors compared tobramycin peak and random serum levels collected by PV and PICC using a detailed flush and waste protocol. RESULTS: The authors analyzed a total of 19 patients with peripheral and PICC samples. The mean tobramycin peak collected by PV (27.2 mcg/mL) was similar to the mean peak collected by PICC (26.9 mcg/mL) (paired samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = .94). The correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.85-0.91, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Tobramycin serum samples collected by PICC appear to be similar in value to PV collections. Collecting aminoglycoside levels by PICC rather than PV may reduce patient discomfort and improve quality of life. Additional multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.

Airway inflammation accelerates pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

Airway inflammation underlies cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations. In a prospective multicenter study of randomly selected, clinically stable adolescents and adults, we assessed relationships between 24 inflammation-associated molecules and the future occurrence of CF pulmonary exacerbation using proportional hazards models. We explored relationships for potential confounding or mediation by clinical factors and assessed sensitivities to treatments including CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR) protein synthesis modulators. Results from 114 participants, including seven on ivacaftor or lumacaftor-ivacaftor, representative of the US CF population during the study period, identified 10 biomarkers associated with future exacerbations mediated by percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s. The findings were not sensitive to anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, and CFTR modulator treatments. The analyses suggest that combination treatments addressing RAGE-axis inflammation, protease-mediated injury, and oxidative stress might prevent pulmonary exacerbations. Our work may apply to other airway inflammatory diseases such as bronchiectasis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.