[Application of preputial endoscopy in the treatment of phimosis].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application value of preputial endoscopy in the treatment of phimosis. METHODS: The clinical data were obtained on 58 cases of phimosis with an obvious narrow ring at the prepuce mouth and unable to reveal the glans penis when pushed up, which were treated in hour department from October 2018 to May 2020. The patients underwent preputial endoscopic examination followed by circumcision (group A, n = 30) or simple circumcision (group B, n = 28). A ureteroscope was used for preputial endoscopy, and the foreign matter removed with forceps to prepare for later circumcision. Under surface anesthesia, the ureteroscope was entered into the preputial cavity to observe the intactness and smoothness of the right, left and anterior walls and the frenulum side, as well as possible bleeding, tumor or hypospadias. RESULTS: Preputial endoscopy was successfully performed in all the 30 cases, which revealed 1 case of adhesive integration of the inner preputial lamina to the glans, 1 case of hypospadias, 2 cases of preputial adhesion and 2 cases of glans hemorrhage. Pathological biopsy confirmed penile cancer in 1 of the 6 cases. Lateral wall hemorrhage was found in 4 cases, preputial stones in 3, which was removed with foreign matter forceps, and preputial infection in 5 cases, which was treated by intrapreputial irrigation and antibiotic anti-inflammation therapy. The preputial endoscopic examinations lasted (6.52 ± 2.03) min. The operation time was significantly shorter in group A than in B (ï¼»37.81 ± 4.09ï¼½ vs ï¼»48.04 ± 5.48ï¼½ min, P < 0.01), and so were the postoperative pain duration (ï¼»110.74 ± 22.09ï¼½ vs ï¼»121.43 ± 26.80ï¼½ min, P < 0.01) and postoperative recovery time (ï¼»7.96 ± 1.83ï¼½ vs ï¼»12.04 ± 3.28ï¼½ d, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Preputial endoscopy is a safe and efficient method for the diagnosis and treatment of phimosis, with the advantages of simple operation, short examination time and less intraoperative pain, making essential preparations for subsequent circumcision.

[Clinical Utility of Revised Cardiac Risk Index to Predict Perioperative Cardiac Events in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery].

Objective To explore the predictive ability of the revised cardiac risk index(RCRI)in elderly patients with coronary heart disease(CHD)undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Methods We performed a retrospective study including a total of 2100 patients,aged≥65 with a history of CHD who underwent non-cardiac surgery form January 2013 to September 2019.The preoperative,intraoperative and postoperative clinical data were extracted from an electronic database.The RCRI and reconstructed-RCRI(R-RCRI)score of each patient were calculated.The primary end point was defined as an occurrence of perioperative MACE.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the risk factors of perioperative MACE.The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to compare the predictive value of RCRI,R-RCRI,and the new risk scoring system of the study for perioperative MACE. Results The incidence of perioperative MACE in elderly patients with CHD was 5.4%.Six independent risk factors of perioperative MACE for this population were identified:age≥80 years;female;history of heart failure;insulin-depended diabetes mellitus;preoperative ST segment abnormality;American Society of Anesthesiologists grade≥Ⅲ,and the risk index was 2,2,2,2,2 and 3 respectively.The area under ROC curve of RCRI,R-RCRI and risk scoring system in this study were 0.586,0.552 and 0.741. Conclusion The correlation between RCRI score and perioperative MACE was poor in elderly patients with CHD undergoing non-cardiac surgery,and a better cardiac risk assessment method should be established for this population.