Intraoperative use of processed electroencephalogram in a quaternary center: a quality improvement audit.

Although intraoperative electroencephalography (EEG) is not consensual among anesthesiologists, growing evidence supports its use to titrate anesthetic drugs, assess the level of arousal/consciousness, and detect ischemic cerebrovascular events; in addition, intraoperative EEG monitoring may decrease the incidence of postoperative neurocognitive disorders. Based on the known and potential benefits of intraoperative EEG monitoring, an educational program dedicated to staff anesthesiologists, residents of Anesthesiology and anesthesia technicians was started at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi in May 2022 and completed in June 2022, aiming to have all patients undergoing general anesthesia with adequate brain monitoring and following international initiatives promoting perioperative brain health. All the surgical cases performed under General Anesthesia at 24 daily locations were prospectively inspected during 15 consecutive working days in March 2023. The use or absence of a processed EEG monitor was registered. Of 379 surgical cases distributed by 24 locations under General Anesthesia, 233 cases (61%) had processed EEG monitoring. The specialty with the highest use of EEG monitoring was Cardiothoracic Surgery, with 100% of cases, followed by interventional Cardiology (90%) and Vascular Surgery (75%). Otorhinolaryngology (29%), Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (25%), and Interventional Pulmonology (20%) were the areas with the lowest use of EEG monitoring. Of note, in the Neuroradiology suite, no processed EEG monitor was used in cases under General Anesthesia. We identified a reasonable use of EEG monitoring during general anesthesia, unfortunately not reaching our target of 100%. The educational and support program previously implemented within the Anesthesiology Institute needs to be continued and improved, including workshops, online discussions, and journal club sessions, to increase the use of EEG monitoring in underused areas.

Electroencephalographic guided propofol-remifentanil TCI anesthesia with and without dexmedetomidine in a geriatric population: electroencephalographic signatures and clinical evaluation.

Elderly and multimorbid patients are at high risk for developing unfavorable postoperative neurocognitive outcomes; however, well-adjusted and EEG-guided anesthesia may help titrate anesthesia and improve postoperative outcomes. Over the last decade, dexmedetomidine has been increasingly used as an adjunct in the perioperative setting. Its synergistic effect with propofol decreases the dose of propofol needed to induce and maintain general anesthesia. In this pilot study, we evaluate two highly standardized anesthetic regimens for their potential to prevent burst suppression and postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction in a high-risk population. Prospective, randomized clinical trial with non-blinded intervention. Operating room and post anesthesia care unit at Hospital Base San José, Osorno/Universidad Austral, Valdivia, Chile. 23 patients with scheduled non-neurologic, non-cardiac surgeries with age > 69 years and a planned intervention time > 60 min. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a propofol-remifentanil based anesthesia or an anesthetic regimen with dexmedetomidine-propofol-remifentanil. All patients underwent a slow titrated induction, followed by a target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil (n = 10) or propofol, remifentanil and continuous dexmedetomidine infusion (n = 13). We compared the perioperative EEG signatures, drug-induced changes, and neurocognitive outcomes between two anesthetic regimens in geriatric patients. We conducted a pre- and postoperative Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) test and measured the level of alertness postoperatively using a sedation agitation scale to assess neurocognitive status. During slow induction, maintenance, and emergence, burst suppression was not observed in either group; however, EEG signatures differed significantly between the two groups. In general, EEG activity in the propofol group was dominated by faster rhythms than in the dexmedetomidine group. Time to responsiveness was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.352). Finally, no significant differences were found in postoperative cognitive outcomes evaluated by the MoCa test nor sedation agitation scale up to one hour after extubation. This pilot study demonstrates that the two proposed anesthetic regimens can be safely used to slowly induce anesthesia and avoid EEG burst suppression patterns. Despite the patients being elderly and at high risk, we did not observe postoperative neurocognitive deficits. The reduced alpha power in the dexmedetomidine-treated group was not associated with adverse neurocognitive outcomes.

Non-invasive technology for brain monitoring: definition and meaning of the principal parameters for the International PRactice On TEChnology neuro-moniToring group (I-PROTECT).

Technologies for monitoring organ function are rapidly advancing, aiding physicians in the care of patients in both operating rooms (ORs) and intensive care units (ICUs). Some of these emerging, minimally or non-invasive technologies focus on monitoring brain function and ensuring the integrity of its physiology. Generally, the central nervous system is the least monitored system compared to others, such as the respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal systems, even though it is a primary target in most therapeutic strategies. Frequently, the effects of sedatives, hypnotics, and analgesics are entirely unpredictable, especially in critically ill patients with multiple organ failure. This unpredictability exposes them to the risks of inadequate or excessive sedation/hypnosis, potentially leading to complications and long-term negative outcomes. The International PRactice On TEChnology neuro-moniToring group (I-PROTECT), comprised of experts from various fields of clinical neuromonitoring, presents this document with the aim of reviewing and standardizing the primary non-invasive tools for brain monitoring in anesthesia and intensive care practices. The focus is particularly on standardizing the nomenclature of different parameters generated by these tools. The document addresses processed electroencephalography, continuous/quantitative electroencephalography, brain oxygenation through near-infrared spectroscopy, transcranial Doppler, and automated pupillometry. The clinical utility of the key parameters available in each of these tools is summarized and explained. This comprehensive review was conducted by a panel of experts who deliberated on the included topics until a consensus was reached. Images and tables are utilized to clarify and enhance the understanding of the clinical significance of non-invasive neuromonitoring devices within these medical settings.

Changes in motor evoked potentials after erector spinae block in scoliosis surgery-when to take pre-incision baseline recordings?

Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is highly valuable in scoliosis surgeries for monitoring spinal cord function, particularly during instrumentation. Accurate timing of baseline recordings of TcMEP and SSEP is crucial, as any changes observed during surgery and instrumentation are compared to these baseline recordings. However, the impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae block (USG-ESPB) on SSEP and TcMEP is not well-studied in scoliosis surgery. In this report, we present two cases of scoliosis surgery where bilateral two-level USG-ESPB using different concentrations of ropivacaine (0.375% and 0.2%) resulted in a transient and significant deterioration of TcMEP, occurring 3 minutes after the block and lasting for 20 minutes. Remarkably, SSEPs remained unchanged during this period. These findings suggest that USG-ESPB may produce TcMEP changes, highlighting the importance of carefully considering the timing of baseline TcMEP acquisition in scoliosis surgery.

Factors influencing the need for emergent conversion to general anesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy in acute anterior circulation stroke - A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) for acute ischemic stroke can be conducted under conscious sedation (CS) or general anesthesia (GA). Emergency conversion from CS to GA during the procedure can occur, but its predictors and impact on clinical outcomes are not fully understood. METHODS: A single centre retrospective analysis was conducted on 226 patients who underwent EMT for anterior circulation stroke. Two groups were identified: patients who completed the procedure under CS and those requiring emergency conversion to GA. The predictors of emergency conversion to GA and its impact on clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (19.9%) required conversion to GA. Atrial fibrillation (OR 2.38; CI 1.09-5.22; p = 0.03) and prolonged duration of procedure (OR 1.02; CI 1.01-1.04; p < 0.001) were identified as the independent predictors of emergency conversion to GA. CONCLUSION: Patients with atrial fibrillation and prolonged duration of procedure especially when utilizing combined aspiration-stent retriever or angioplasty/stenting techniques, had a higher likelihood of requiring emergency conversion to general anesthesia (GA).

Linear thinking does not reflect the newer 21st-century anesthesia concepts. A narrative review.

The brain constitutes a good example of a chaotic, nonlinear biological system where large neuronal networks operate chaotically with random connectivity. This critical state is significantly affected by the anesthetic loss of consciousness induced by drugs whose pharmacological behavior has been classically based on linear kinetics and dynamics. Recent developments in pharmacology and brain monitoring during anesthesia suggest a different view that we tried to explore in this article. The concepts of effect-site for hypnotic drugs modeling a maximum effect, electroencephalographic dynamics during induction, maintenance, and recovery from anesthesia are discussed, integrated into this alternative view, and how it may be applied in daily clinical practice.

The importance of monitoring cerebral oxygenation in non brain injured patients.

Over the past few years, the use of non-invasive neuromonitoring in non-brain injured patients has increased, as a result of the recognition that many of these patients are at risk of brain injury in a wide number of clinical scenarios and therefore may benefit from its application which allows interventions to prevent injury and improve outcome. Among these, are post cardiac arrest syndrome, sepsis, liver failure, acute respiratory failure, and the perioperative settings where in the absence of a primary brain injury, certain groups of patients have high risk of neurological complications. While there are many neuromonitoring modalities utilized in brain injured patients, the majority of those are either invasive such as intracranial pressure monitoring, require special skill such as transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, or intermittent such as pupillometry and therefore unable to provide continuous monitoring. Cerebral oximetry using Near infrared Spectroscopy, is a simple non invasive continuous measure of cerebral oxygenation that has been shown to be useful in preventing cerebral hypoxemia both within the intensive care unit and the perioperative settings. At present, current recommendations for standard monitoring during anesthesia or in the general intensive care concentrate mainly on hemodynamic and respiratory monitoring without specific indications regarding the brain, and in particular, brain oximetry. The aim of this manuscript is to provide an up-to-date overview of the pathophysiology and applications of cerebral oxygenation in non brain injured patients as part of non-invasive multimodal neuromonitoring in the early identification and treatment of neurological complications in this population.

Oxygen Reserve Index and Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen: Relationship in Open Heart Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Mild to moderate hyperoxia is potentially beneficial to patients undergoing open heart surgery. Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI) is a novel parameter that correlates to arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) in the hyperoxic range. This prospective study aimed to assess whether the relationship between ORI and PaO2 remains intact in the setting of open-heart surgery. METHODS: This study included patients undergoing valve, aortic arch and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries, on and off pump, between September 1st 2019 and August 31st 2021. Enrolled patients had arterial blood gas samples collected and analyzed after induction of anesthesia and increases in FiO2 in steps of 0.08 with ORI being recorded at the time of sample collection for cross reference and analysis. RESULTS: ORI values showed a statistically significant correlation with PaO2 values in the 100-200 mmHg range (r = 0.8193, p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant correlation between ORI and SpO2 values in the range of 95% and 100% (r = 0.529, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The preserved relationship between ORI and PaO2 in the mild and moderate hyperoxic range can allow more precise titration of oxygen therapy to guide therapy targeting normoxia, mildly and moderately hyperoxia. Additionally, it could have a potential use as an early warning system for impeding hypoxia.

Inhalational versus Intravenous General Anesthesia for mechanical thrombectomy for stroke: A single centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: When general anesthesia is used for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the choice of anesthetic agents for maintenance remains inconclusive. The different effects of intravenous anesthetic and volatiles agents on cerebral hemodynamics are known and may explain differences in outcomes of patients with cerebral pathologies exposed to the different anesthetic modalities. In this single institutional retrospective study, we assessed the impact of total intravenous (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia on outcomes after EVT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients ≥ 18 years who underwent EVT for AIS of the anterior or posterior circulation under general anesthesia. Baseline patient characteristics, anesthetic agents, intra operative hemodynamics, stroke characteristics, time intervals and clinical outcome data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 191 patients. After excluding 76 patients who were lost to follow up at 90 days, 51 patients received inhalational anesthesia and 64 patients who received TIVA were analyzed. The clinical characteristics between the groups were comparable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of outcome measures for TIVA versus inhalational anesthesia showed significantly increased odds of good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.25-8.36; p = 0.015) and a non-significant trend towards decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; CI, 0.15-3.6; p = 0.70). CONCLUSION: Patients who had TIVA for mechanical thrombectomy had significantly increased odds of good functional outcome at 90 days and a non-significant trend towards decrease in mortality. These findings warrant further investigation with large randomized, prospective trials.

Peri-operative multimodal monitoring: a real need or a luxury?

The present case of a patient with several co-morbidities undergoing complex vitrectomy under peribulbar block and sedation with Target Controlled Infusion (TCI of propofol and dexmedetomidine with EEG and Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) monitoring illustrates the benefits of multimodal monitoring to differentiate the effect of hypnotic and antinociceptive drugs.It is highlighted the delta-alpha electroencephalographic pattern showing adequate sedation, the beta arousal pattern in the EEG concommitant to decrease in the ANI translating insufficient anti-nociception.

Processed Electroencephalogram-Based Monitoring to Guide Sedation in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Recommendations from an International Expert Panel-Based Consensus.

BACKGROUND: The use of processed electroencephalography (pEEG) for depth of sedation (DOS) monitoring is increasing in anesthesia; however, how to use of this type of monitoring for critical care adult patients within the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of international experts consisting of 21 clinicians involved in monitoring DOS in ICU patients was carefully selected on the basis of their expertise in neurocritical care and neuroanesthesiology. Panelists were assigned four domains (techniques for electroencephalography [EEG] monitoring, patient selection, use of the EEG monitors, competency, and training the principles of pEEG monitoring) from which a list of questions and statements was created to be addressed. A Delphi method based on iterative approach was used to produce the final statements. Statements were classified as highly appropriate or highly inappropriate (median rating ≥ 8), appropriate (median rating ≥ 7 but < 8), or uncertain (median rating < 7) and with a strong disagreement index (DI) (DI < 0.5) or weak DI (DI ≥ 0.5 but < 1) consensus. RESULTS: According to the statements evaluated by the panel, frontal pEEG (which includes a continuous colored density spectrogram) has been considered adequate to monitor the level of sedation (strong consensus), and it is recommended by the panel that all sedated patients (paralyzed or nonparalyzed) unfit for clinical evaluation would benefit from DOS monitoring (strong consensus) after a specific training program has been performed by the ICU staff. To cover the gap between knowledge/rational and routine application, some barriers must be broken, including lack of knowledge, validation for prolonged sedation, standardization between monitors based on different EEG analysis algorithms, and economic issues. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on using DOS monitors in ICU is still scarce, and further research is required to better define the benefits of using pEEG. This consensus highlights that some critically ill patients may benefit from this type of neuromonitoring.

Seeking the Light in Intensive Care Unit Sedation: The Optimal Sedation Strategy for Critically Ill Patients.

The clinical approach to sedation in critically ill patients has changed dramatically over the last two decades, moving to a regimen of light or non-sedation associated with adequate analgesia to guarantee the patient's comfort, active interaction with the environment and family, and early mobilization and assessment of delirium. Although deep sedation (DS) may still be necessary for certain clinical scenarios, it should be limited to strict indications, such as mechanically ventilated patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), status epilepticus, intracranial hypertension, or those requiring target temperature management. DS, if not indicated, is associated with prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, and increased mortality. Therefore, continuous monitoring of the level of sedation, especially when associated with the raw EEG data, is important to avoid unnecessary oversedation and to convert a DS strategy to light sedation as soon as possible. The approach to the management of critically ill patients is multidimensional, so targeted sedation should be considered in the context of the ABCDEF bundle, a holistic patient approach. Sedation may interfere with early mobilization and family engagement and may have an impact on delirium assessment and risk. If adequately applied, the ABCDEF bundle allows for a patient-centered, multidimensional, and multi-professional ICU care model to be achieved, with a positive impact on appropriate sedation and patient comfort, along with other important determinants of long-term patient outcomes.

Salted or sweet? Hypertonic saline or mannitol for treatment of intracranial hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review article is to present current recommendations regarding the use of hypertonic saline and mannitol for the treatment of intracranial hypertension. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, a significant number of studies have been published comparing hypertonic saline with mannitol in patients with acute increased intracranial pressure, mostly caused by traumatic brain injury. Albeit several randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis support hypertonic saline as more effective than mannitol in reducing intracranial pressure, no clear benefit in regards to the long-term neurologic outcome of these patients has been reported. SUMMARY: Identifying and treating increased intracranial pressure is imperative in neurocritical care settings and proper management is essential to improve long-term outcomes. Currently, there is insufficient evidence from comparative studies to support a formal recommendation on the use of any specific hyperosmolar medication in patients with acute increased intracranial pressure.

How to Study the Brain While Anesthetizing It?! A Scoping Review on Running Neuroanesthesiologic Studies and Trials That Include Neurosurgical Patients.

This scoping review addresses the challenges of neuroanesthesiologic research: the population, the methods/treatment/exposure, and the outcome/results. These challenges are put into the context of a future research agenda for peri-/intraoperative anesthetic management, neurocritical care, and applied neurosciences. Finally, the opportunities of adaptive trial design in neuroanesthesiologic research are discussed.