RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to assess the available evidence regarding the effect of a variety of fasting-like regimens on preventing chemotherapy-related side effects. PubMed, Scopus and Embase were used to select the studies for this review, which concluded on 24 November 2022. All types of clinical trials and case series reporting chemotherapy toxicity associated with fasting regimens and any comparison were considered. A total of 283 records were identified, of which 274 were excluded, leaving only nine studies that met the inclusion criteria. Five of these trials were randomized. Overall, moderate to high-quality evidence showed that several fasting regimens did not provide benefits compared to a conventional diet or other comparators in reducing the risk of adverse events. The overall pooled estimate for a variety of fasting regime when compared to non-fasting, indicated no significant difference in the side effects (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.77-1.59; I2 = 10%, p = 0.60), including neutropenia alone (RR = 1.33; 95% CI: 0.90-1.97; I2 = 0%, p = 0.15). A sensitivity analysis confirmed these results. Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity. The development of cancer treatment that do not entail toxicities remains imperative.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/etiología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no approved medication for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease management. Pre-clinical and clinical studies showed that several bioactive molecules in plants or foods (i.e., curcumin complex, bergamot polyphenol fraction, artichoke leaf extract, black seed oil, concentrate fish oil, picroliv root, glutathione, S-adenosyl-L-methionine and other natural ingredients) have been associated with improved fatty liver disease. Starting from these evidences, our purpose was to evaluate the effects of a novel combination of abovementioned nutraceuticals as a treatment for adults with fatty liver disease. METHODS: A total of 140 participants with liver steatosis were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial. The intervention group received six softgel capsules daily of a nutraceutical (namely Livogen Plus®) containing a combination of natural bioactive components for 12 weeks. The control group received six softgel capsules daily of a placebo containing maltodextrin for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change in liver fat content (CAP score). CAP score, by transient elastography, serum glucose, lipids, transaminases, and cytokines were measured at baseline and after intervention. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounding variables (i.e., CAP score and triglyceride at baseline, and changes of serum γGT, and vegetable and animal proteins, cholesterol intake at the follow-up), we found a greater CAP score reduction in the nutraceutical group rather than placebo (- 34 ± 5 dB/m vs. - 20 ± 5 dB/m, respectively; p = 0.045). The CAP score reduction (%) was even greater in those with aged 60 or less, low baseline HDL-C, AST reduction as well as in men. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that a new combination of bioactive molecules as nutraceutical was safe and effective in reducing liver fat content over 12 weeks in individuals with hepatic steatosis. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN70887063. Registered 03 August 2021-retrospectively registered, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN70887063.