The starting rate for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in infants with bronchiolitis: Is clinical judgment enough?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether in infants with bronchiolitis admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) the starting rate for high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy set by the attending physicians upon clinical judgment meets patients' peak inspiratory flow (PIF) demands and how it influences respiratory mechanics and breathing effort. METHODOLOGY: We simultaneously obtained respiratory flow and esophageal pressure data from 31 young infants with moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis before and after setting the HFNC rate at 1 L/kg/min (HFNC-1), 2 L/kg/min (HFNC-2) or upon clinical judgment and compared data for PIF, respiratory mechanics, and breathing effort. RESULTS: Before HFNC oxygen therapy started, 16 (65%) infants had a PIF less than 1 L/kg/min (normal-PIF) and 15 (45%) had a PIF more than or equal to 1 L/kg/min (high-PIF). Normal-PIF-infants had higher airway resistance (p < .001) and breathing effort indexes (e.g., pressure rate product per min [PTP/min], p = .028) than high-PIF-infants. Starting the HFNC rate upon clinical judgment (1.20-2.05 L/kg/min) met all infants' PIFs. In normal-PIF-infants, the clinically judged flow rate increased PIF (p = .081) and tidal volume (p = .029), reduced airway resistance (p = .011), and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (p = .041), whereas, in both high-PIF and normal-PIF infants, it decreased respiratory rate (p < .001) and indexes of breathing effort such as PTP/min (in normal-PIF infants, p = .004; in high-PIF infants, p = .001). The 2 L/kg/min but not 1 L/kg/min rate induced similar effects. CONCLUSIONS: The wide PIF distribution in our PICU population of infants with bronchiolitis suggests two disease phenotypes whose therapeutic options might differ. An initial flow rate of nearly 2 L/kg/min meets patients' flow demands and improves respiratory mechanics and breathing effort.

Inter-society consensus for the use of inhaled corticosteroids in infants, children and adolescents with airway diseases.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, a multidisciplinary panel of experts from eight Italian scientific paediatric societies developed a consensus document for the use of inhaled corticosteroids in the management and prevention of the most common paediatric airways disorders. The aim is to provide healthcare providers with a multidisciplinary document including indications useful in the clinical practice. The consensus document was intended to be addressed to paediatricians who work in the Paediatric Divisions, the Primary Care Services and the Emergency Departments, as well as to Residents or PhD students, paediatric nurses and specialists or consultants in paediatric pulmonology, allergy, infectious diseases, and ear, nose, and throat medicine. METHODS: Clinical questions identifying Population, Intervention(s), Comparison and Outcome(s) were addressed by methodologists and a general agreement on the topics and the strength of the recommendations (according to the GRADE system) was obtained following the Delphi method. The literature selection included secondary sources such as evidence-based guidelines and systematic reviews and was integrated with primary studies subsequently published. RESULTS: The expert panel provided a number of recommendations on the use of inhaled corticosteroids in preschool wheezing, bronchial asthma, allergic and non-allergic rhinitis, acute and chronic rhinosinusitis, adenoid hypertrophy, laryngitis and laryngospasm. CONCLUSIONS: We provided a multidisciplinary update on the current recommendations for the management and prevention of the most common paediatric airways disorders requiring inhaled corticosteroids, in order to share useful indications, identify gaps in knowledge and drive future research.

Nasopharyngeal tubes in pediatric anesthesia: Is the flow-dependent pressure drop across the tube suitable for calculating oropharyngeal pressure?

BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal tubes are useful in pediatric anesthesia for insufflating oxygen and anesthetics. During nasopharyngeal tube-anesthesia, gas insufflation provides some positive oropharyngeal pressure that differs from the proximal airway pressure owing to the flow-dependent pressure drop across the nasopharyngeal tube (ΔPNPT ). AIMS: This study aimed to investigate whether ΔPNPT could be used for calculating oropharyngeal pressure during nasopharyngeal tube-assisted anesthesia. METHODS: In a physical model of nasopharyngeal tube-anesthesia, using Rohrer's equation, we calculated ΔPNPT for three nasopharyngeal tubes (3.5, 4.0, and 5.0 mm inner diameter) under oxygen and several sevoflurane in oxygen combinations in two ventilatory scenarios (continuous positive airway pressure and intermittent positive pressure ventilation). We then calculated oropharyngeal pressure as proximal airway pressure minus ΔPNPT . Calculated and measured oropharyngeal pressure couples of values were compared with the root mean square deviation to assess accuracy. We also investigated whether oropharyngeal pressure accuracy depends on the nasopharyngeal tube diameter, flow rate, gas composition, and leak size. Using ΔPNPT charts, we tested whether ΔPNPT calculation was feasible in clinical practice. RESULTS: When we tested small-diameter nasopharyngeal tubes at high-flow or high-peak inspiratory pressure, proximal airway pressure measurements markedly overestimated oropharyngeal pressure. Comparing measured and calculated maximum and minimum oropharyngeal pressure couples yielded root mean square deviations less than 0.5 cmH2 O regardless of ventilatory modality, nasopharyngeal tube diameter, flow rate, gas composition, and leak size. CONCLUSION: During nasopharyngeal tube-assisted anesthesia, proximal airway pressure readings on the anesthetic monitoring machine overestimate oropharyngeal pressure especially for smaller-diameter nasopharyngeal tubes and higher flow, and to a lesser extent for large leaks. Given the importance of calculating oropharyngeal pressure in guiding nasopharyngeal tube ventilation in clinical practice, we propose an accurate calculation using Rohrer's equation method, or approximating oropharyngeal pressure from flow and pressure readings on the anesthetic machine using the ΔPNPT charts.