Expert consensus on improving iron deficiency anemia management in obstetrics and gynecology in Asia.

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a major health burden among women in Asia. Key issues in IDA management in Asia are under-diagnosis and under-treatment. The lack of Asia-specific guidelines, and suboptimal utilization of treatment compounds the management of IDA. To address these gaps, a panel of 12 experts in obstetrics, gynecology, and hematology from six regions in Asia convened to review current practices and clinical evidence and provide practical guidance on IDA diagnosis and management in Asian women. The Delphi approach was used to obtain objective opinions and attain consensus on statements pertaining to awareness, diagnosis, and management of IDA. In total, 79 statements attained consensus and are summarized to provide guidance on raising awareness of IDA and approaches for improved diagnosis and treatment of IDA among women in various settings: pregnancy, postpartum, heavy menstrual bleeding, gynecologic cancers, and perioperative care. This clinician-led consensus integrates appropriate recommendations based on clinical evidence and best practices and is intended to guide decision making in the management of iron deficiency/IDA in women. The expert panel raises a call for timely diagnosis and utilization of appropriate treatment, including use of high-dose intravenous iron, stringent blood management, and interdisciplinary collaboration, for optimization of IDA management among women in Asia.

A comparison of the feasibility and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with the conventional radical hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Radical hysterectomy has been the treatment of choice for early-stage cervical cancer. Since its introduction in oncology, modifications to the original technique were made to enhance feasibility, improve cure rate, and decrease postoperative complications. Among these are the identification and preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves, known as the nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (RH). This retrospective study was conducted to compare the nerve-sparing with the conventional RH in terms of feasibility and safety, including bladder dysfunction and perioperative and postoperative complications and morbidities. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven early-stage cervical carcinoma, cervical carcinoma with central tumor recurrence or persistence after primary radiotherapy, and endometrial carcinoma with cervical involvement treated with RH with or without nerve-sparing technique were included. The perioperative and postoperative complications and bladder function of these patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients with early-stage cervical cancer and 24 patients with clinical stage II endometrial cancer underwent RH with or without nerve-sparing technique in a nonrandomized fashion. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 procedures in terms of duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and morbidity. Patients who underwent the nerve-sparing approach had a statistically significant earlier return of bladder function, with a mean of 9.4 days for the cervical cancer cases (vs 21 days in the non-nerve-sparing group) and a mean of 8.5 days for the endometrial cancer cases (vs 22.6 days in the non-nerve-sparing group). CONCLUSIONS: The technique of sparing the pelvic autonomic nerves during RH for early-stage cervical cancer and clinical stage II endometrial cancer is comparable to the conventional method in terms of perioperative complications and morbidity, but is more favorable in terms of return of bladder function.