The differential computed tomography features between small benign and malignant solid solitary pulmonary nodules with different sizes.

Background: Computed tomography (CT) has been widely known to be the first choice for the diagnosis of solid solitary pulmonary nodules (SSPNs). However, the smaller the SSPN is, the less the differential CT signs between benign and malignant SSPNs there are, which brings great challenges to their diagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the differential CT features between small (≤15 mm) benign and malignant SSPNs with different sizes. Methods: From May 2018 to November 2021, CT data of 794 patients with small SSPNs (≤15 mm) were retrospectively analyzed. SSPNs were divided into benign and malignant groups, and each group was further classified into three cohorts: cohort I (diameter ≤6 mm), cohort II (6 mm < diameter ≤8 mm), and cohort III (8 mm < diameter ≤15 mm). The differential CT features of benign and malignant SSPNs in three cohorts were identified. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent factors of benign SSPNs. Results: In cohort I, polygonal shape and upper-lobe distribution differed significantly between groups (all P<0.05) and multiparametric analysis showed polygonal shape [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 12.165; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.512-97.872; P=0.019] was the most effective variation for predicting benign SSPNs, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.640-0.855; P=0.001). In cohort II, polygonal shape, lobulation, pleural retraction, and air bronchogram differed significantly between groups (all P<0.05), and polygonal shape (OR: 8.870; 95% CI: 1.096-71.772; P=0.041) and the absence of pleural retraction (OR: 0.306; 95% CI: 0.106-0.883; P=0.028) were independent predictors of benign SSPNs, with an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.694-0.863; P<0.001). In cohort III, 12 CT features showed significant differences between groups (all P<0.05) and polygonal shape (OR: 3.953; 95% CI: 1.508-10.361; P=0.005); calcification (OR: 3.710; 95% CI: 1.305-10.551; P=0.014); halo sign (OR: 6.237; 95% CI: 2.838-13.710; P<0.001); satellite lesions (OR: 6.554; 95% CI: 3.225-13.318; P<0.001); and the absence of lobulation (OR: 0.066; 95% CI: 0.026-0.167; P<0.001), air space (OR: 0.405; 95% CI: 0.215-0.764; P=0.005), pleural retraction (OR: 0.297; 95% CI: 0.179-0.493; P<0.001), bronchial truncation (OR: 0.165; 95% CI: 0.090-0.303; P<0.001), and air bronchogram (OR: 0.363; 95% CI: 0.208-0.633; P<0.001) were independent predictors of benign SSPNs, with an AUC of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.840-0.897; P<0.001). Conclusions: CT features vary between SSPNs with different sizes. Clarifying the differential CT features based on different diameter ranges may help to minimize ambiguities and discriminate the benign SSPNs from malignant ones.

Clinical and non-contrast computed tomography characteristics and disease development in patients with benign pulmonary subsolid nodules with a solid component ≤ 5 mm.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and non-contrast computed tomography (CT) features of patients with benign pulmonary subsolid nodules (SSNs) with a solid component ≤ 5 mm and their development trends via follow-up CT. METHODS: We retrospectively collected 436 data from patients who had SSNs with a solid component ≤ 5 mm, including 69 with absorbable benign SSNs (AB-SSNs), 70 with nonabsorbable benign SSNs (NB-SSNs), and 297 with malignant SSNs (M-SSNs). Models 1, 2, and 3 for distinguishing the different types of SSNs were then developed and validated. RESULTS: Patients with AB-SSNs were younger and exhibited respiratory symptoms more frequently than those with M-SSNs. The frequency of nodules detected during follow-up CT was in the following order: AB-SSNs > NB-SSNs > M-SSNs. NB-SSNs were smaller than M-SSNs, and ill-defined margins were more frequent in AB-SSNs than in NB-SSNs and M-SSNs. Benign SSNs exhibited irregular shape, target sign, and lower CT values more frequently compared to M-SSNs, whereas the latter demonstrated bubble lucency more commonly compared to the former. Furthermore, AB-SSNs showed more thickened interlobular septa and satellite lesions than M-SSNs and M-SSNs had more pleural retraction than AB-SSNs (all p < 0.017). The three models had AUCs ranging 0.748-0.920 and 0.790-0.912 in the training and external validation cohorts, respectively. A follow-up CT showed nodule progression in four benign SSNs. CONCLUSIONS: The three SSN types have different clinical and imaging characteristics, with some benign SSNs progressing to resemble malignancy. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A good understanding of the imaging features and development trends of benign SSNs may help reduce unnecessary follow-up or interventions. This retrospective study explores the CT characteristics of benign SSNs with a solid component ≤ 5 mm by comparing AB-SSNs, NB-SSNs, and M-SSNs and delineates their development trends via follow-up CT. KEY POINTS: 1. Different subsolid nodule types exhibit distinct clinical and imaging features. 2. A miniscule number of benign subsolid nodules can progress to resemble malignancy. 3. Knowing the clinical and imaging features and development trends of benign subsolid nodules can improve management.