Validation of a microfluidic platform to measure total therapeutic antibodies and incurred sample reanalysis performance.

BACKGROUND: A microfluidic platform-based assay was validated to measure a humanized or fully human IgG in rat serum samples. MATERIALS & METHODS: The cumulative assessment for accuracy and precision was performed with three accuracy and precision runs. RESULTS: The inter-assay accuracy (mean %bias) ranged from -4.3 to 3.8%, and inter-batch %CV ranged from 5.0 to 9.2%. The method acceptance criterion was determined as 15% total error. The assay dynamic range was 50 to 10000 ng/ml. Incurred sample reanalysis passed with 95% of samples meeting incurred sample reanalysis acceptance criteria. Potential carryover effect was not observed. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the need for evaluating additional platform-specific processes when new technologies are employed to ensure the reproducibility of a successfully validated microfluidic platform method.

Bioanalytical method requirements and statistical considerations in incurred sample reanalysis for macromolecules.

BACKGROUND: Incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) is the most recent in-study validation parameter that regulatory agencies have mandated to ensure reproducibility of bioanalytical methods supporting pharmacokinetic/toxicokinetic and clinical studies. The present analysis describes five representative case studies for macromolecule therapeutics. METHOD: Single ISR acceptance criteria (within 30% of the averaged or original concentration) and a modified Bland-Altman (BA) approach were used to assess accuracy and precision of ISR results. General concordance between the two criteria was examined using simulation studies. RESULTS: All five methods met the ISR criteria. The results indicated that thorough method development and prestudy validation were prerequisites for a successful ISR. The overall agreement between the original and reanalyzed results as determined by BA was within 20%. Simulation studies indicated that concordance between the ISR criteria and BA was observed in 95% of the cases. Dilution factors had no significant impact on the ISR, even for C(max) samples where 1:100 or higher dilutions were used. CONCLUSION: The current ISR acceptance criteria for macromolecules was scientifically and statistically meaningful for methods with a total error of 25% or less.