Prevalence and clinical relevance of comorbid pertussis infection in adult patients with asthma: A prospective, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Viral or atypical bacterial respiratory infections are involved in the new development and the pathogenesis of asthma. Though an association between pertussis and asthma has been expected, few studies have reported it consistently. We assessed the prevalence and clinical relevance of pertussis infection in adult patients with asthma. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, newly referred, adult patients with asthma (n = 107) and with non-asthmatic subacute/chronic cough (n = 31) were enrolled. The prevalence of pertussis in patients with asthma and in those with non-asthmatic subacute/chronic cough was assessed. Next, the prevalence of newly diagnosed asthma was compared between asthmatic patients with and without pertussis. Finally, demographic characteristics of patients, blood test results, pulmonary function test results, and questionnaire scores were compared between the two patient groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of pertussis infection was significantly higher in patients with asthma than in those with non-asthmatic subacute/chronic cough (36% vs 10%; P = 0.004). The prevalence of newly diagnosed asthma was significantly higher in asthmatic patients with pertussis than in those without (74.4% vs 50.0%; P = 0.014). The physical, psychological, and total scores of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire were significantly lower in asthmatic patients with pertussis than in those without (all P < 0.05). The acid-reflux, dyspeptic, and total scores of the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (FSSG) were significantly higher in asthmatic patients with pertussis than in those without (all P ≤ 0.05). The FSSG acid-reflux score was negatively correlated with the cough-specific quality of life (QOL) score only in asthmatic patients with pertussis (rho = -0.68, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pertussis infection was significantly higher in adult patients with asthma than in those with non-asthmatic subacute/chronic cough. In patients with asthma, comorbid pertussis infection may play a role in newly diagnosed asthma and may contribute to impaired cough-specific QOL partly due to worsening acid-reflux symptoms of GERD.

Efficacy of dupilumab for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab exerts clinical effects, including improved sinus opacification, olfactory function, and quality of life, in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs). Meanwhile, only a few studies have reported its effects on nasal airway resistance and olfactory function, particularly in the Japanese population. Predictors of response remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the comprehensive efficacy and therapeutic response to dupilumab in patients with severe CRSwNP with comorbid asthma. METHODS: In 16 adult patients with severe CRSwNP with comorbid asthma, the efficacy of 48-week dupilumab treatment, including olfactory function measured by a T&T olfactometer, nasal airway resistance measured by rhinomanometry, nasal polyp score, Lund-Mackay computed tomography score, and 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), was assessed. Regarding asthma, the annualized rate of exacerbations, 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7), and spirometry were assessed. Treatment responsiveness was analyzed. RESULTS: With 48-week dupilumab treatment, olfactory function, nasal airway resistance, nasal polyp score, Lund-Mackay computed tomography score, and SNOT-22 scores improved significantly. Regarding comorbid asthma, the annualized rate of exacerbations decreased, and ACQ-7 scores and lung function improved significantly. According to the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020/European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases criteria, 15 patients (94%) were moderate-to-excellent responders at 48 weeks of treatment. Patients with higher SNOT-22 scores, ACQ-7 scores, the rate of asthma exacerbations in the previous year, and blood eosinophil counts benefited more from the treatment. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab improved upper and lower airway outcomes especially in patients with severe CRSwNP with comorbid, poorly controlled asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000038669.

Unrealistic expectations and disclosure of incurability in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Determining whether patients' unrealistic expectations of chemotherapy as a cure were associated with their perception of the disclosure of incurability. METHODS: This prospective study included consecutive patients with pretreated non-small cell lung cancer from four study sites. Patients and their oncologists were asked whether they perceived the disclosure of cancer incurability. Patients were also asked if they thought that chemotherapy was curative. We followed up on whether the deceased patients received specialized palliative care 14 months after their last enrollment. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between the expectation of chemotherapy as a cure and patient/oncologist-reported perceptions of the disclosure of incurability. RESULTS: We analyzed 200 patients, 77 (38.5%) of whom had unrealistic expectations of a cure. Based on patients' perceptions, incurability was disclosed to 138 (69.0%) patients, and based on their oncologists' perceptions, incurability was disclosed to 185 (92.5%) patients (patient/oncologist agreements, κ = 0.19). Patients without a perception of the oncologist's disclosure of incurability-regardless of their oncologist's perception-were more likely to have unrealistic expectations of a cure than patients for whom both patient and oncologist perceptions were present. Patients who had unrealistic expectations of chemotherapy as a cure were shown to be significantly less likely to have received specialized palliative care, after adjusting for covariates (adjusted OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.91; p = .027). CONCLUSION: Oncologists' disclosure of incurability was not fully recognized by patients, and expectations of chemotherapy as a cure were associated with patients' perception of the disclosure of incurability.

Efficacy of dupilumab for airway hypersecretion and airway wall thickening in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: A prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab has clinical effects in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. When considering interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 signaling, effects of dupilumab on airway mucus hypersecretion and airway remodeling are expected, but they have been reported in only a few short-term studies. Its efficacy for airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) remains unknown. We comprehensively assessed the efficacy of dupilumab, especially for subjective and objective measures of airway mucus hypersecretion and airway dimensions in moderate-to-severe asthmatic patients. METHODS: In 28 adult patients with moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma, the comprehensive efficacy of 48-week dupilumab treatment, including the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q), radiological mucus scores and airway dimensions on computed tomography (CT), was assessed prospectively. Treatment responsiveness to dupilumab was analyzed. RESULTS: With 48-week dupilumab treatment, all four cough and sputum domain scores of CASA-Q improved significantly. Radiological mucus scores and airway wall thickening on CT were significantly decreased. The decreases in mucus scores were significantly associated with improvements in Asthma Control Questionnaire scores, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) overall scores, airway obstruction, and airway type 2 inflammation. When defined by > 0.5 improvement in AQLQ overall scores, 18 patients (64%) were identified as responders. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab reversed subjective and objective measures of airway mucus hypersecretion and some aspects of airway remodeling in patients with moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma.

Biomarker Testing in Patients With Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: Biomarker testing for driver mutations is essential for selecting appropriate non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment but is insufficient. Objective: To investigate the status of biomarker testing and drug therapy for NSCLC in Japan for identifying problems in treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: The REVEAL cohort study included retrospective data collection and prospective follow-up from 29 institutions across Japan. Of 1500 patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent NSCLC between January 1 and March 18, 2021, 1479 were eligible. Cases recognized at the wrong clinical stage (n = 12), diagnosed outside the study period (n = 6), not treated according to eligibility criteria before recurrence (n = 2), and with deficient consent acquisition procedure (n = 1) were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the biomarker testing status. Treatment-related factors were examined. Results: Among the 1479 patients included in the analysis, the median age was 72 (range, 30-95) years; 1013 (68.5%) were men; 1161 (78.5%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1; 1097 (74.2%) were current or past smokers; and 947 (64.0%) had adenocarcinoma. Biomarker status was confirmed in 1273 patients (86.1%). Multigene testing was performed in 705 cases (47.7%); single-gene testing, in 847 (57.3%); and both, in 279 (18.9%). Biomarker testing was performed for EGFR in 1245 cases (84.2%); ALK, in 1165 (78.8%); ROS1, in 1077 (72.8%); BRAF, in 803 (54.3%); and MET, in 805 (54.4%). Positivity rates among 898 adenocarcinoma cases included 305 (34.0%) for EGFR, 29 (3.2%) for ALK, 19 (2.1%) for ROS1, 11 (1.2%) for BRAF, and 14 (1.6%) for MET. Positivity rates among 375 nonadenocarcinoma cases were 14 (3.7%) for EGFR, 6 (1.6%) for ALK, 1 (0.3%) for ROS1, 3 (0.8%) for BRAF, and 8 (2.1%) for MET. Poor physical status, squamous cell carcinoma, and other comorbidities were associated with hampered multigene testing. Targeted therapy was received as first-line treatment by 263 of 278 cases (94.6%) positive for EGFR, 25 of 32 (78.1%) positive for ALK, 15 of 24 (62.5%) positive for ROS1, 9 of 12 (75.0%) positive for BRAF, and 12 of 19 (63.2%) positive for MET. Median overall survival of patients with positive findings for driver gene alteration and who received targeted therapy was 24.3 (95% CI, not reported) months; with positive findings for driver gene alteration and who did not receive targeted therapy, 15.2 (95% CI, 7.7 to not reported) months; and with negative findings for driver gene alteration, 11.0 (95% CI, 10.0-12.5) months. Multigene testing for nonadenocarcinomas and adenocarcinomas accounted for 705 (47.7%) of all NSCLC cases. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that multigene testing has not been sufficiently implemented in Japan and should be considered prospectively, even in nonadenocarcinomas, to avoid missing rare driver gene alterations.