Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism: 2024 guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) developed in collaboration with the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), the French Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SFTH) and the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV) and endorsed by the French Society of Digestive Surgery (SFCD), the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and INNOVTE (Investigation Network On Venous ThromboEmbolism) network.

BACKGROUND: Any surgical procedure carries a risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), albeit variable. Improvements in medical and surgical practices and the shortening of care pathways due to the development of day surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery, have reduced the perioperative risk for VTE. OBJECTIVE: A collaborative working group of experts in perioperative haemostasis updated in 2024 the recommendations for the Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism published in 2011. METHODS: The addressed questions were defined by 40 experts (GIHP, SFAR, SFTH and SFMV) and formulated in a PICO format. They performed the literature review and formulated recommendations according to the Grading of GRADE system. Recommendations were then validated by a vote determining the strength of each recommendation. Of note, these recommendations do not cover all surgical specialties. Especially, thromboprophylaxis in cardiac surgery, neurosurgery and obstetrics is not addressed. RESULTS: 78 recommendations were formalized into 17 sections, including patient-related VTE risk factors, types of surgery, extreme body weight, renal impairment, mechanical prophylaxis, distal deep vein thrombosis; 27 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1) and 41 a low level of evidence (GRADE 2) and 10 were expert opinion. All had strong agreement among the experts. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines help to weigh the perioperative risk for VTE (which includes the risk associated to surgery and the patient-related risk) against the adverse effects of thromboprophylaxis, either pharmacological or mechanical. This includes particularly the bleeding risk induced by antithrombotic drugs as well as costs.

Guidelines for the prescription of standard hematology and biochemistry clinical laboratory tests in the intensive care unit: A scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review protocol describes the strategy for a scoping review that aims to provide a comprehensive overview of published guidelines for the prescription of standard laboratory tests performed in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. BACKGROUND: The use of clinical laboratories is constantly increasing. However, there is evidence of inappropriate use. Inappropriate laboratory testing has the potential to harm patients, increase costs, burden staff, and has an environmental impact. Effective management can be achieved through demand managing strategies, such as providing guidelines on performing the appropriate test, for the right patient, at the right time. Although national and international guidelines exist for individual tests, a comprehensive summary of available recommendations for laboratory testing in the ICU is currently unavailable. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This scoping review will incorporate documents that provide explicit advice on which test to perform in ICU patients. We selected 34 tests routinely ordered in the ICU. This review will consider any document type that matches our concept and context. We will consider gray literature with appropriate adherence to guidelines methodology. We will not limit the review by geographical location, but will only include articles published in English. SEARCH STRATEGY: Our scoping review will follow the Joanna Brigg Institute (JBI) methodology. We will search Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Google. Our search strategy adheres to the JBI 3-step construction approach for systematic reviews. We will search for keywords related to guidelines, laboratory testing, and the 34 selected tests. We will report our study using the S1 Checklist. Review registration number: osf.io/yfs9z.

Management of Therapeutic-intensity Unfractionated Heparin: A Narrative Review on Critical Points.

Nowadays, unfractionated heparin (UFH) use is limited to selected patient groups at high risk of both bleeding and thrombosis (patients in cardiac surgery, in intensive care unit, and patients with severe renal impairment), rendering its management extremely challenging, with many unresolved questions despite decades of use. In this narrative review, we revisit the fundamental concepts of therapeutic anticoagulation with UFH and address five key points, summarizing controversies underlying the use of UFH and discussing the few recent advances in the field: (1) laboratory tests for UFH monitoring have significant limitations; (2) therapeutic ranges are not well grounded; (3) the actual influence of antithrombin levels on UFH's anticoagulant activity is not well established; (4) the concept of UFH resistance lacks supporting data; (5) scarce data are available on UFH use beyond acute venous thromboembolism. We therefore identified key issues to be appropriately addressed in future clinical research: (1) while anti-Xa assays are often considered as the preferred option, we call for a vigorous action to improve understanding of the differences between types of anti-Xa assays and to solve the issue of the usefulness of added dextran; (2) therapeutic ranges for UFH, which were defined decades ago using reagents no longer available, have not been properly validated and need to be confirmed or reestablished; (3) UFH dose adjustment nomograms require full validation.

Relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and ICU-acquired candidemia in critically ill medical patients: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: While SARS-CoV2 infection has been shown to be a significant risk-factor for several secondary bacterial, viral and Aspergillus infections, its impact on intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired candidemia (ICAC) remains poorly explored. METHOD: Using the REA-REZO network (French surveillance network of ICU-acquired infections), we included all adult patients hospitalized for a medical reason of admission in participating ICUs for at least 48 h from January 2020 to January 2023. To account for confounders, a non-parsimonious propensity score matching was performed. Rates of ICAC according to SARS-CoV2 status were compared in matched patients. Factors associated with ICAC in COVID-19 patients were also assessed using a Fine-Gray model. RESULTS: A total of 55,268 patients hospitalized at least 48 h for a medical reason in 101 ICUs were included along the study period. Of those, 13,472 were tested positive for a SARS-CoV2 infection while 284 patients developed an ICAC. ICAC rate was higher in COVID-19 patients in both the overall population and the matched patients' cohort (0.8% (107/13,472) versus 0.4% (173/41,796); p < 0.001 and 0.8% (93/12,241) versus 0.5% (57/12,241); p = 0.004, respectively). ICAC incidence rate was also higher in those patients (incidence rate 0.51 per 1000 patients-days in COVID-19 patients versus 0.32 per 1000 patients-days; incidence rate ratio: 1.58 [95% CI:1.08-2.35]; p = 0.018). Finally, patients with ICAC had a higher ICU mortality rate (49.6% versus 20.2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter cohort of ICU patients, although remaining low, the rate of ICAC was higher among COVID-19 patients.

Applying Machine Learning for Prescriptive Support: A Use Case with Unfractionated Heparin in Intensive Care Units.

Continuous unfractionated heparin is widely used in intensive care, yet its complex pharmacokinetic properties complicate the determination of appropriate doses. To address this challenge, we developed machine learning models to predict over- and under-dosing, based on anti-Xa results, using a monocentric retrospective dataset. The random forest model achieved a mean AUROC of 0.80 [0.77-0.83], while the XGB model reached a mean AUROC of 0.80 [0.76-0.83]. Feature importance was employed to enhance the interpretability of the model, a critical factor for clinician acceptance. After prospective validation, machine learning models such as those developed in this study could be implemented within a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) as a clinical decision support system (CDSS).

Tinzaparin, an alternative to subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, in patients with severe and end-stage renal impairment: a retrospective observational single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Tinzaparin could be easier to manage than unfractionated heparin in patients with severe renal impairment. However, clinical and pharmacologic data regarding its use in such patients are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine, in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 mL.min⁻1, tinzaparin pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters using a population PK approach and bleeding and thrombotic complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational single-center study, including in-patients with eGFR of <30 mL.min⁻1 receiving prophylactic (4500 IU.d⁻1) or therapeutic (175 IU.kg⁻1.d⁻1) tinzaparin. Measured anti-Xa levels were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Individual predicted tinzaparin exposure markers at steady state were calculated for each patient and dosing regimen. The PK was also evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations based on the final covariate model parameter estimates. RESULTS: Over a 22-month period, 802 tinzaparin treatment periods in 623 patients were analyzed: two-thirds received a prophylactic dose, 66% had an eGFR of <20 mL.min⁻1, and 25% were on renal replacement therapy. In patients for whom anti-Xa measurements were performed (n = 199; 746 values), PK parameters, profiles, and maximum plasma concentrations were comparable with those in patients without renal impairment or in healthy volunteers. In the whole population, major bleeding occurred in 2.4% and 3.5% of patients receiving prophylactic and therapeutic doses over a median 9- and 7-day treatment period, respectively. No patients had thrombotic complications. CONCLUSION: Tinzaparin PK parameters and profiles were not affected by renal impairment. This suggests that tinzaparin, at therapeutic or prophylactic dose, could be an alternative to unfractionated heparin in hospitalized patients with severe renal impairment.

Impact of Intraoperative Allogeneic Platelet Transfusion on Healthcare-Associated Infections in Cardiac Surgery: Insights From a Large Single-Center Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite significant improvement in patient blood management, cardiac surgery remains a high hemorrhagic risk procedure. Platelet transfusion is used commonly to treat thrombocytopenia-associated perioperative bleeding. Allogeneic platelet transfusion may induce transfusion-related immunomodulation. However, its association with postoperative healthcare-associated infections is still a matter of debate. The objective was to evaluate the impact of allogeneic platelet transfusion during cardiac surgery on postoperative healthcare-associated infection incidence. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery from 2012 to 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperative platelet transfusion was defined as exposure in a causal model. The primary outcome was the incidence of healthcare-associated infections comprised of bloodstream infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and surgical-site infection. Among 7,662 included patients, 528 patients (6.8%) were exposed to intraoperative platelet transfusion, and 329 patients (4.3%) developed 454 postoperative infections. Bloodstream infection affected 106 patients (1.4%), hospital-acquired pneumonia affected 174 patients (2.3%), and surgical-site infection affected 148 patients (1.9%). Intraoperative platelet transfusion was associated with an increased risk of bloodstream infection after adjustment by multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% CI 1.40-5.8; p = 0.004; n = 7,662), propensity score matching (OR 3.95; 95% CI 1.57-12.0), p = 0.007; n = 766), and propensity score overlap weighting (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.51-6.1, p = 0.002; n = 7,762). Surgical-site infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia were not significantly associated with platelet transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that intraoperative allogeneic platelet transfusion is a risk factor for bloodstream infection after cardiac surgery. These results supported the development of patient blood management strategies aimed at minimizing perioperative platelet transfusion in cardiac surgery.

Healthcare-associated infections in patients with severe COVID-19 supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Both critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support exhibit a high incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HAI). However, data on incidence, microbiology, resistance patterns, and the impact of HAI on outcomes in patients receiving ECMO for severe COVID-19 remain limited. We aimed to report HAI incidence and microbiology in patients receiving ECMO for severe COVID-19 and to evaluate the impact of ECMO-associated infections (ECMO-AI) on in-hospital mortality. METHODS: For this study, we analyzed data from 701 patients included in the ECMOSARS registry which included COVID-19 patients supported by ECMO in France. RESULTS: Among 602 analyzed patients for whom HAI and hospital mortality data were available, 214 (36%) had ECMO-AI, resulting in an incidence rate of 27 ECMO-AI per 1000 ECMO days at risk. Of these, 154 patients had bloodstream infection (BSI) and 117 patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The responsible microorganisms were Enterobacteriaceae (34% for BSI and 48% for VAP), Enterococcus species (25% and 6%, respectively) and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (13% and 20%, respectively). Fungal infections were also observed (10% for BSI and 3% for VAP), as were multidrug-resistant organisms (21% and 15%, respectively). Using a Cox multistate model, ECMO-AI were not found associated with hospital death (HR = 1.00 95% CI [0.79-1.26], p = 0.986). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide cohort of COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO support, we observed a high incidence of ECMO-AI. ECMO-AI were not found associated with hospital death. Trial registration number NCT04397588 (May 21, 2020).

Antithrombin Levels and Heparin Responsiveness during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Prospective Single-center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin, administered during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to prevent thromboembolic events, largely depends on plasma antithrombin for its antithrombotic effects. Decreased heparin responsiveness seems frequent on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; however, its association with acquired antithrombin deficiency is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to describe longitudinal changes in plasma antithrombin levels during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and evaluate the association between antithrombin levels and heparin responsiveness. The hypothesis was that extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support would be associated with acquired antithrombin deficiency and related decreased heparin responsiveness. METHODS: Adults receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were prospectively included. All patients received continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin using a standardized protocol (target anti-Xa 0.3 to 0.5 IU/ml). For each patient, arterial blood was withdrawn into citrate-containing tubes at 11 time points (from hour 0 up to day 7). Anti-Xa (without dextran or antithrombin added) and antithrombin levels were measured. The primary outcome was the antithrombin plasma level. In the absence of consensus, antithrombin deficiency was defined as a time-weighted average of antithrombin less than or equal to 70%. Data regarding clinical management and heparin dosage were collected. RESULTS: Fifty patients, including 42% postcardiotomy, were included between April 2020 and May 2021, with a total of 447 samples. Median extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration was 7 (interquartile range, 4 to 12) days. Median antithrombin level was 48% (37 to 60%) at baseline. Antithrombin levels significantly increased throughout the follow-up. Time-weighted average of antithrombin levels was 63% (57 to 73%) and was less than or equal to 70% in 32 (64%) of patients. Overall, 45 (90%) patients had at least one antithrombin value less than 70%, and 35 (70%) had at least one antithrombin value less than 50%. Antithrombin levels were not significantly associated with heparin responsiveness evaluated by anti-Xa assay or heparin dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with a moderate acquired antithrombin deficiency, mainly during the first 72 h, that did not correlate with heparin responsiveness.

Interventions to improve appropriateness of laboratory testing in the intensive care unit: a narrative review.

Healthcare expenses are increasing, as is the utilization of laboratory resources. Despite this, between 20% and 40% of requested tests are deemed inappropriate. Improper use of laboratory resources leads to unwanted consequences such as hospital-acquired anemia, infections, increased costs, staff workload and patient stress and discomfort. The most unfavorable consequences result from unnecessary follow-up tests and treatments (overuse) and missed or delayed diagnoses (underuse). In this context, several interventions have been carried out to improve the appropriateness of laboratory testing. To date, there have been few published assessments of interventions specific to the intensive care unit. We reviewed the literature for interventions implemented in the ICU to improve the appropriateness of laboratory testing. We searched literature from 2008 to 2023 in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases between April and June 2023. Five intervention categories were identified: education and guidance (E&G), audit and feedback, gatekeeping, computerized physician order entry (including reshaping of ordering panels), and multifaceted interventions (MFI). We included a sixth category exploring the potential role of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-based assisting tools in such interventions. E&G-based interventions and MFI are the most frequently used approaches. MFI is the most effective type of intervention, and shows the strongest persistence of effect over time. AI/ML-based tools may offer valuable assistance to the improvement of appropriate laboratory testing in the near future. Patient safety outcomes are not impaired by interventions to reduce inappropriate testing. The literature focuses mainly on reducing overuse of laboratory tests, with only one intervention mentioning underuse. We highlight an overall poor quality of methodological design and reporting and argue for standardization of intervention methods. Collaboration between clinicians and laboratory staff is key to improve appropriate laboratory utilization. This article offers practical guidance for optimizing the effectiveness of an intervention protocol designed to limit inappropriate use of laboratory resources.

Factors Influencing Anti-Xa Assays: A Multicenter Prospective Study in Critically Ill and Noncritically Ill Patients Receiving Unfractionated Heparin.

BACKGROUND: The presence of dextran sulfate (DS) in reagents and the type of blood collection tube (citrate/citrated-theophylline-adenosine-dipyridamole [CTAD]) can lead to discrepancies between unfractionated heparin (UFH) anti-Xa levels. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent of the effect (1) of different reagents containing or not containing DS and (2) of the blood collection tubes, on UFH anti-Xa levels, in various clinical situations (NCT04700670). METHODS: We prospectively included patients from eight centers: group (G)1, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) after heparin neutralization (n = 39); G2, cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) after CPB (n = 35); G3, medical ICU (n = 53); G4, other medical inpatients (n = 38). Blood was collected into citrated and CTAD tubes. Chromogenic anti-Xa assays were centrally performed, using seven reagent/analyzer combinations including two without DS. The association between anti-Xa levels and covariates was tested using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: We analyzed 4,546 anti-Xa values from 165 patients. Median anti-Xa levels were systematically higher with reagents containing DS, whatever the patient group, with the greatest effect observed in G1 (0.32 vs. 0.05 IU/mL). Anti-Xa levels were slightly higher in CTAD than in citrate samples, irrespective of the assay. The model showed: (1) a significant dextran-patient group interaction (p < 0.0001), the effect of DS on anti-Xa levels varying from 30.9% in G4 to 296% in G1, and (2) a significant effect of CTAD, varying between patient groups (p = 0.0302). CONCLUSION: The variability of anti-Xa levels with a great overestimation of the values, using a reagent containing DS, can lead to different treatment decisions, especially after heparin neutralization by protamine. Clinical consequences of these differences remain to be demonstrated.

Combined Platelet and Red Blood Cell Recovery during On-pump Cardiac Surgery Using same™ by i-SEP Autotransfusion Device: A First-in-human Noncomparative Study (i-TRANSEP Study).

BACKGROUND: Centrifugation-based autotransfusion devices only salvage red blood cells while platelets are removed. The same™ device (Smart Autotransfusion for ME; i-SEP, France) is an innovative filtration-based autotransfusion device able to salvage both red blood cells and platelets. The authors tested the hypothesis that this new device could allow a red blood cell recovery exceeding 80% with a posttreatment hematocrit exceeding 40%, and would remove more than 90% of heparin and 75% of free hemoglobin. METHODS: Adults undergoing on-pump elective cardiac surgery were included in a noncomparative multicenter trial. The device was used intraoperatively to treat shed and residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood. The primary outcome was a composite of cell recovery performance, assessed in the device by red blood cell recovery and posttreatment hematocrit, and of biologic safety assessed in the device by the washout of heparin and free hemoglobin expressed as removal ratios. Secondary outcomes included platelet recovery and function and adverse events (clinical and device-related adverse events) up to 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: The study included 50 patients, of whom 18 (35%) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft, 26 (52%) valve surgery, and 6 (12%) aortic root surgery. The median red blood cell recovery per cycle was 86.1% (25th percentile to 75th percentile interquartile range, 80.8 to 91.6) with posttreatment hematocrit of 41.8% (39.7 to 44.2). Removal ratios for heparin and free hemoglobin were 98.9% (98.2 to 99.7) and 94.6% (92.7 to 96.6), respectively. No adverse device effect was reported. Median platelet recovery was 52.4% (44.2 to 60.1), with a posttreatment concentration of 116 (93 to 146) · 109/l. Platelet activation state and function, evaluated by flow cytometry, were found to be unaltered by the device. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-human study, the same™ device was able to simultaneously recover and wash both platelets and red blood cells. Compared with preclinical evaluations, the device achieved a higher platelet recovery of 52% with minimal platelet activation while maintaining platelet ability to be activated in vitro.