Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate discontinuation for renal outcomes: any room for treatment personalization?

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a very effective antiviral drug that has been associated with tubular dysfunction. The aim of this study was to analyze the demographic, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacogenetic variables associated with TDF discontinuation for renal outcomes in stable HIV-positive patients using multivariable analyses. Three hundred and four patients were included (73% male, with median age and eCrCl of 45.3 years and 90.9 mL/min, respectively). After a median follow-up of 28.3 months, 27 patients discontinued TDF for renal adverse events [persistent urinary abnormalities (n = 21) or eCrCl < 60 mL/min (n = 6)] providing an incidence of 3.77 events per 100 patient-year. The probability of TDF discontinuation was higher with several features (male gender, older age, not Caucasians ancestry, absence of intravenous drug abuse, protease inhibitors, previous indinavir, HCV-positivity, lower CD4 cell count, detectable HIV-RNA, lower eCrCl, spot-urine proteinuria) and higher tenofovir concentrations but not genetic variants. Tenofovir plasma concentrations were prognostic of TDF discontinuation for renal adverse events suggesting that dose-adjustment may be warranted for long-term safety.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of boosted PIs in HIV-positive patients: undetectable plasma concentrations and risk of virological failure.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiretroviral drugs is performed in selected HIV-positive patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of undetectable plasma concentrations of ritonavir and boosted PIs and to evaluate the association between those and the 48 week risk of virological failure. Methods: A TDM registry study and a retrospective follow-up study were conducted. Plasma concentrations were measured through validated methods. According to PI and ritonavir concentrations, patients were stratified as adherent, partially non-adherent or non-adherent. Virological outcome was evaluated 48 weeks afterwards. Results: The TDM registry study included 2468 samples collected from 723 patients (68.1% male, median age 43.5 years). Eighty-seven samples (3.5%, 74 patients) and 68 samples (2.8%, 52 patients) were in the partially non-adherent and non-adherent groups, respectively; more patients on atazanavir/ritonavir (7.9%) versus darunavir/ritonavir (2% twice daily and 1.9% once daily) and lopinavir/ritonavir (1.5%; P < 0.001) were observed in the partially non-adherent group. Two hundred and ninety patients were included in the follow-up study (64.1% male, median age 40 years). Patients in the adherent group had a higher chance of viral control [81.9% (167/204)] versus the partially non-adherent group and the non-adherent group [71.7% (33/46) and 53.1% (17/32), respectively; P  =   0.001]. Based on multivariate analysis, baseline HIV RNA >50 copies/mL ( P < 0.001), genotypic susceptibility score ≤2 ( P = 0.001), lower nadir CD4 cell count ( P = 0.003) and not being in the adherent group ( P = 0.029) were independent predictors of HIV RNA >50 copies/mL at 48 weeks. Conclusions: The measurement of PI and ritonavir plasma levels can uncover incomplete compliance with treatment; TDM may represent a useful tool for identifying patients in need of adherence-promoting interventions.

Clinical pharmacology of tenofovir clearance: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacogenetic study on plasma and urines.

The HIV virus and hepatitis B virus nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir has been associated with proximal tubular toxicity; the latter was found to be predicted by plasma concentrations and with single-nucleotide polymorphisms in transporters-encoding genes. A cross-sectional analysis in adult HIV-positive patients with estimated creatinine clearance >60 ml min-1 was performed. Twelve-hour plasma and urinary tenofovir concentrations and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in several transporter-encoding genes were analysed. In 289 patients 12-h tenofovir plasma, urinary and urinary to plasma ratios were 69 ng ml-1 (interquartile range 51.5-95), 24.3 mg ml-1 (14.3-37.7) and 384 (209-560). At multivariate analysis estimated creatinine clearance, protease inhibitors co-administration and SLC28A2 CT/TT genotypes were independently associated with plasma tenofovir exposure; ABCC10 GA/AA genotypes and protease inhibitor co-administration were independently associated with the urinary to plasma tenofovir ratio. Tenofovir clearance was associated with genetic polymorphisms in host genes and with co-administered drugs: if confirmed by ongoing studies these data may inform treatment tailoring and/or dose reductions.

Successful pharmacogenetics-based optimization of unboosted atazanavir plasma exposure in HIV-positive patients: a randomized, controlled, pilot study (the REYAGEN study).

BACKGROUND: Atazanavir without ritonavir, despite efficacy and tolerability, shows low plasma concentrations that warrant optimization. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled, pilot trial, stable HIV-positive patients on atazanavir/ritonavir (with tenofovir/emtricitabine) were switched to atazanavir. In the standard-dose arm, atazanavir was administered as 400 mg once daily, while according to patients' genetics (PXR, ABCB1 and SLCO1B1), in the pharmacogenetic arm: patients with unfavourable genotypes received 200 mg of atazanavir twice daily. EudraCT number: 2009-014216-35. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled with balanced baseline characteristics. The average atazanavir exposure was 253 ng/mL (150-542) in the pharmacogenetic arm versus 111 ng/mL (64-190) in the standard-dose arm (P < 0.001); 28 patients in the pharmacogenetic arm (75.7%) had atazanavir exposure >150 ng/mL versus 14 patients (38.9%) in the standard-dose arm (P = 0.001). Immunovirological and laboratory parameters had a favourable outcome throughout the study with non-significant differences between study arms. CONCLUSIONS: Atazanavir plasma exposure is higher when the schedule is chosen according to the patient's genetic profile.

Efficacy, tolerability and virological consequences of long-term use of unboosted atazanavir plus 2 NRTIs in HIV-infected patients.

PURPOSE: Switch to unboosted atazanavir (ATV) is an attractive option due to convenience and tolerability in HIV-positive patients. With limited available data we investigated the determinants of long-term efficacy and the consequences of virological failure of unboosted atazanavir-based regimens. METHODS: Retrospective analysis in two Italian large outpatient clinics including demographic, immunovirological, resistance and pharmacokinetic data. RESULTS: 249 patients receiving atazanavir (400 mg once-daily) plus 2 NRTIs were included; 163 were males (65.5%) and median age was 47 years (42-51.5). Median CD4+ T-cell count was 396/uL (261-583); 146 (58.6%) presented a viral load < 50 copies/mL. Over a median follow up of 157 weeks (106-203) 193 patients (77.5%) were still on treatment with 10 (4%) and 2 (0.8%) stopping for virological failure or toxicity, respectively. Ten patients with virological failure presented newly selected resistance associated mutations (RAMs) for NRTIs (2/10) or ATV (4/10, one I50L). Total cholesterol and triglycerides showed significant decreases at 48 [-4 mg/dL and -41 mg/dL] and 96 weeks [-14 mg/dL and -54 mg/dL] as compared to baseline. At multivariate analysis a genotypic sensitivity score ≤ 1, atazanavir RAMs > 1 and suboptimal adherence were independently associated with virological failure; in lamivudine/emtricitabine-treated patients the presence of M184V (without other NRTI RAMs) was not associated with virological failure. CONCLUSION: Unboosted-atazanavir containing regimens were efficacious (with uncommon virological failures) and well-tolerated (with improvements in lipid profile over time) treatments in HIV-positive patients. Isolated M184V in lamivudine/emtricitabine recipients was not associated with higher failure rates supporting the use of functional ATV-based dual therapies as maintenance strategies.

Etravirine plasma exposure is associated with virological efficacy in treatment-experienced HIV-positive patients.

Etravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used in combination with other antiretrovirals for the treatment of HIV infection. Given previous conflicting results aim of this study was to investigate whether etravirine plasma exposure was associated with virological outcome. Adult HIV-positive patients starting etravirine with detectable HIV viral loads were included if highly adherent (<90% of the doses) and if steady-state plasma concentrations were available (measured through a validated HPLC-PDA method). Virological success was defined as reaching and maintaining viral suppression (HIV RNA <50copies/mL) during follow up. Fifty-nine (84.7% male) patients were included: baseline CD4+ T-lymphocyte and HIV RNA were 276cells/µL (101-419) and 3.99Log10copies/mL (3.11-4.91), respectively. Darunavir/ritonavir (n=21, 35.6%) and raltegravir plus maraviroc (n=33, 55.9%) were the most common associated antiretrovirals. 240 trough samples were available (3-7 per patient); etravirine trough concentrations (Ctrough) and weighted genotypic inhibitory quotients (wgIQ) were 426ng/mL (266-763) and 408ng/mL/mutation (227-663), respectively. Virological success was observed in 49 patients (83.1%). Genotypic sensitivity of associated drugs (GSS) ⩾2 (p=0.03), etravirine Ctrough >300ng/mL (p=0.02) and etravirine wgIQ >276ng/mL/mutation (p=0.02) were associated with virological success; at multivariate Cox proportional analysis etravirine wgIQ <276ng/mL/mutation (p=0.012) and baseline CD4 <200cell/µL (p=0.043) were independently associated with virological failure. In a cohort of experienced patients etravirine exposure as well as immune status were associated with virological success; two cut off values (300ng/mL and 276ng/mL) were proposed for etravirine Ctrough and wgIQ and need to be confirmed in prospective studies.