Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol ; 11(4): 842-855, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38366285

RESUMEN

Four sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators (fingolimod, ozanimod, ponesimod, and siponimod) are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. This review summarizes efficacy and safety data on these S1P receptor modulators, with an emphasis on similarities and differences. Efficacy data from the pivotal clinical trials are generally similar for the four agents. However, because no head-to-head clinical studies were conducted, direct efficacy comparisons cannot be made. Based on the adverse event profile of S1P receptor modulators, continued and regular monitoring of patients during treatment will be instructive. Notably, the authors recommend paying attention to the cardiac monitoring guidelines for these drugs, and when indicated screening for macular edema and cutaneous malignancies before starting treatment. To obtain the best outcome, clinicians should choose the drug based on disease type, history, and concomitant medications for each patient. Real-world data should help to determine whether there are meaningful differences in efficacy or side effects between these agents.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Moduladores de los Receptores de fosfatos y esfingosina 1 , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Moduladores de los Receptores de fosfatos y esfingosina 1/efectos adversos , Receptores de Esfingosina-1-Fosfato/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Fingolimod/efectos adversos , Administración Oral
2.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 14(1): e200241, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38204588

RESUMEN

Background: Anti-CD20 therapies have proven to be highly effective and safe therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) and have had rapid uptake in the MS community. However, no clear consensus has arisen regarding an approach to screening or surveillance lab monitoring. Recent Findings: Based on current evidence, for screening labs before anti-CD20 initiation, we propose checking liver function test (LFT), complete blood count with differential (CBC), absolute B-cell count, quantitative immunoglobulins, hepatitis B virus serologies, varicella zoster virus IgG, John Cunningham virus (JCV) status, and age-appropriate vaccination history. For surveillance monitoring in an otherwise asymptomatic individual, we propose biannual LFTs and CBC, quantitative immunoglobulins annually after year 3, absolute B-cell count at month 6 and in the setting of relapse, and JCV only if clinical or radiographic features of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy arise. For ublituximab, pregnancy testing is additionally recommended before each infusion. Implications for Practice: We propose evidence-based screening and safety surveillance labs which take into account likelihood of changing management in an otherwise stable or asymptomatic individual.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA