Reasons for Data-Prompted Site Visits: Field Staff Findings and Review Committee Decisions.

BACKGROUND: A major component of the ACGME's Next Accreditation System (NAS) is the annual review of key performance indicators by each review committee (RC) for all programs under its oversight. The RC may request a site visit that is data-prompted for either a full review of all common and specialty-specific program requirements or a focused review of specific concerns for programs identified as underperforming. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to: (1) identify the reasons that RCs requested data-prompted site visits; (2) describe the findings by accreditation field representatives as reflected in their site visit reports; and (3) summarize the accreditation decisions of RCs that followed the data-prompted site visits (DPSVs). METHODS: RC letters to programs informing them of a DPSV, site visit reports, and RC letters with accreditation decisions were reviewed for all programs having DPSVs from 2015 to 2020. RESULTS: DPSVs were performed in 312 programs, including 59 hospital-based, 122 medical-based, and 131 surgery-based programs; 214 programs had a single DPSV, and 98 programs had repeat DPSV. The most frequent reason that RCs requested a DPSV was noncompliance on the annual ACGME Resident/Fellow Survey. Notification of a DPSV prompted a change in program director in 7% of programs in the single DPSVs group and 57% of programs in the repeat DPSVs group. Surgery-based programs in the single and repeat DPSVs groups were more likely to receive an unfavorable accreditation status. The majority of programs in the single DPSVs group (78%) and repeat DPSVs group (70%) had a status of continued accreditation as of March 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Noncompliance on the Resident/Fellow survey was the most frequent reason that RCs requested a DPSV. The majority of programs in the single and repeat DPSV groups achieved a favorable accreditation status.

Risk acceptance in laryngeal transplantation.

PURPOSE: Advancements in the fields of head and neck surgery and immunology have paved the way for new quality of life-improving procedures such as larynx transplantation. To quantitatively assess the risks versus benefits in larynx transplantation, we used a questionnaire-based survey (Louisville Instrument For Transplantation [LIFT]) to measure the degree of risk individuals are willing to accept to receive different types of transplantation procedures. METHODS: The LIFT contains 237 standardized questions incorporating standard gamble and time tradeoff outcome measures as well as questions assessing body image perception, depression, self-esteem, optimism, socially desirable responding, and demographics. Respondents were questioned on the extent to which they would trade off specific numbers of life-years, or sustain other costs, in exchange for receiving seven different types of transplant procedures. For this study, we questioned 243 individuals in three study populations with differing life experiences: healthy individuals, organ transplant recipients, and laryngectomees. RESULTS: All populations questioned perceived risks differently based on their varied life experiences and would accept differing degrees of risk for the different transplant procedures. Organ transplant recipients were the most risk-tolerant group, whereas laryngectomees were the least risk-tolerant. CONCLUSIONS: By questioning individuals with life experiences directly relevant to the risks and benefits associated with larynx transplantation, this study provides an empiric basis for assessing risk versus benefit in this new quality of life-improving procedure.

Program directors in surgery agree that residents should be formally trained in business and practice management.

BACKGROUND: Surgical residents typically receive limited exposure to business and practice management during their training. As a result, residents are ill-prepared for issues related to starting a practice, coding, collecting, and taking a meaningful role within the medical community in promoting quality and safety and in containing health care costs. With the introduction of the core competencies and the current overhaul of surgical education, we believe there is an opportunity to include business and practice management into resident training. METHODS: Program directors in general surgery (189 of 242) responded to a 9-question mailed survey inquiring about their opinions regarding training surgical residents in business and practice management. RESULTS: Most program directors agreed or strongly agreed (87%) that residents should be trained in business and practice management. Seventy percent believed that their current trainees were inadequately trained in this area. Over half (63%) believed that this training should begin during postgraduate years 2 to 5. CONCLUSIONS: Development of simple curricula aimed at preparing surgical residents for business and practice management could promote the contemporary education of surgeons.