KOOS pain as a marker for significant knee pain two and six years after primary ACL reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) prospective longitudinal cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) approaches 50%, yet the prevalence of significant knee pain is unknown. We applied three different models of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) thresholds for significant knee pain to an ACLR cohort to identify prevalence and risk factors. DESIGN: Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) prospective cohort patients with a unilateral primary ACLR and normal contralateral knee were assessed at 2 and 6 years. Independent variables included patient demographics, validated Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO; Marx activity score, KOOS), and surgical characteristics. Models included: (1) KOOS criteria for a painful knee = quality of life subscale <87.5 and ≥2 of: KOOSpain <86.1, KOOSsymptoms <85.7, KOOSADL <86.8, or KOOSsports/rec <85.0; (2) KOOSpain subscale score ≤72 (≥2 standard deviations below population mean); (3) 10-point KOOSpain drop from 2 to 6 years. Proportional odds models (alpha ≤ 0.05) were used. RESULTS: 1761 patients of median age 23 years, median body mass index (BMI) 24.8 kg/m(2) and 56% male met inclusion, with 87% (1530/1761) and 86% (1506/1761) follow-up at 2 and 6 years, respectively. At 6 years, n = 592 (39%), n = 131 (9%) and n = 169 (12%) met criteria for models #1 through #3, respectively. The most consistent and strongest independent risk factor at both time-points was subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery. Low 2-year Marx activity score increased the odds of a painful knee at 6 years. CONCLUSIONS: Significant knee pain is prevalent after ACLR; with those who undergo subsequent ipsilateral surgery at greatest risk. The relationship between pain and structural OA warrants further study.

Reliability of lower extremity alignment measurement using radiographs and PACS.

PURPOSE: Lower extremity alignment is an important consideration prior to cartilage surgery and/or osteotomy about the knee. This is measured on full length standing hip to ankle radiographs, which has traditionally been done using hard copy radiographs. However, the advent of PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication Systems) has allowed these measurements to be done on computer based digital radiographs. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of lower limb alignment measures manually obtained from hard copy radiographs versus using the Philips Easy Vision system, and to assess the subjective ease of use for the two methods. METHODS: Forty-two patients who underwent surgery and who had a standing hip to ankle radiograph on file were identified. Four raters, including two radiologists and two orthopaedic surgeons, measured each hard copy radiograph and computer image on two separate occasions. Three measurements were recorded for each hard copy radiograph and computer image-width of tibial plateau, the distance from the medial aspect of the tibial plateau to the weight-bearing line, and the mechanical axis. RESULTS: All correlations for this study were high. For tibial plateau data, the hard copy radiographs compared to PACS demonstrated intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 for inter-rater reliability for the four raters. The ICC for intra-rater reliability for hard copies ranged from 0.90 to 0.99 and for PACS from 0.94 to 0.99. The inter-rater data comparing raters ranged from 0.87 to 0.98 for hard copy radiographs and from 0.98 to 0.99 for PACS. For mechanical axis data, the ICC for hard copy radiograph compared to PACS ranged from 0.93 to 0.97 for the intra-rater reliability for the four raters. The intra-rater reliability for mechanical axis data on hard copy radiograph ranged from an ICC of 0.86 to 0.96, and for PACS the ICC ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. The inter-observer data for hard copy radiographs using the mechanical axis ranged from 0.88 to 0.94 and for PACS ranged from 0.93 to 0.97. The physicians rated PACS as statistically significantly easier to use when compared to hard copy (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of lower extremity alignment using two techniques prior to knee surgery was found to have higher inter- and intra-observer reliability using PACS software. PACS is now used prior to cartilage surgery and/or osteotomy to measure both alignment and the location of the weight bearing line on the tibial plateau both before and after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level I.

Symptomatic pulmonary embolism after outpatient arthroscopic procedures of the knee: the incidence and risk factors in 418,323 arthroscopies.

Pulmonary embolism is a serious complication after arthroscopy of the knee, about which there is limited information. We have identified the incidence and risk factors for symptomatic pulmonary embolism after arthroscopic procedures on outpatients. The New York State Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was used to review arthroscopic procedures of the knee performed on outpatients between 1997 and 2006, and identify those admitted within 90 days of surgery with an associated diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Potential risk factors included age, gender, complexity of surgery, operating time defined as the total time that the patient was actually in the operating room, history of cancer, comorbidities, and the type of anaesthesia. We identified 374,033 patients who underwent 418,323 outpatient arthroscopies of the knee. There were 117 events of pulmonary embolism (2.8 cases for every 10 000 arthroscopies). Logistic regression analysis showed that age and operating time had significant dose-response increases in risk (p < 0.001) for a subsequent admission with a pulmonary embolism. Female gender was associated with a 1.5-fold increase in risk (p = 0.03), and a history of cancer with a threefold increase (p = 0.05). These risk factors can be used when obtaining informed consent before surgery, to elevate the level of clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism in patients at risk, and to establish a rationale for prospective studies to test the clinical benefit of thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients.

BACKGROUND: Many patient-based knee-rating scales are available for the evaluation of athletic patients. However, there is little information on the measurement properties of these instruments and therefore no evidence to support the use of one questionnaire rather than another. The goal of the present study was to determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee-rating scales commonly used for the evaluation of athletic patients: the Lysholm scale, the subjective components of the Cincinnati knee-rating system, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons sports knee-rating scale, and the Activities of Daily Living scale of the Knee Outcome Survey. METHODS: All patients in the study had a disorder of the knee and were active in sports (a Tegner score of 4 points). Forty-one patients who had a knee disorder that had stabilized and who were not receiving treatment were administered all four questionnaires at baseline and again at a mean of 5.2 days (range, two to fourteen days) later to test reliability. Forty-two patients were administered the scales at baseline and at a minimum of three months after treatment to test responsiveness. The responses of 133 patients at baseline were studied to test construct validity. RESULTS: The reliability was high for all scales, with the intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.88 to 0.95. As for construct validity, the correlations among the knee scales ranged from 0.70 to 0.85 and those between the knee scales and the physical component scale of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the patient and clinician severity ratings ranged from 0.59 to 0.77. Responsiveness, measured with the standardized response mean, ranged from 0.8 for the Cincinnati knee-rating system to 1.1 for the Activities of Daily Living scale. CONCLUSIONS: All four scales satisfied our criteria for reliability, validity, and responsiveness, and all are acceptable for use in clinical research.

Overuse injuries of the upper extremity in tennis players.

Several overuse injuries can affect the upper extremity of tennis players. A thorough understanding of anatomy and knowledge of these common conditions and their treatment facilitates the management of these athletes.

Stress fracture sites related to underlying bone health in athletic females.

OBJECTIVE: The study tested the hypothesis that females who sustain stress fractures of cancellous bone have decreased bone density. DESIGN: A retrospective, controlled, cross-sectional study. SETTING: The setting of the study was a tertiary care center for Women's Sports Medicine. PATIENTS: 20 female patients under the age of 40 who had suffered a stress fracture and who had a positive diagnostic study (radiograph, bone scan, or magnetic resonance imaging) were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients who had a positive diagnostic study (radiograph, bone scan, or magnetic resonance imaging) for the diagnosis of stress fracture also underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Bone density measured by the DEXA scan, as defined by the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia (greater than one standard deviation from the standard age-matched control). RESULTS: 8 of 9 patients with cancellous stress fractures had DEXA scans indicating osteopenia while only 3 of 11 patients with stress fractures of cortical bone had a scan indicating osteopenia (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A cancellous stress fracture in a female may be a warning sign of early onset osteopenia. We recommend that young females who have documented stress fractures of cancellous bone or cortical bone (with risk factors for osteopenia) undergo bone density evaluation.

Validation of a simple histological-histochemical cartilage scoring system.

In this study, we assessed the validity of a subjective histological-histochemical scoring system as compared to an automated histomorphometry program for analyzing cartilage repair tissue. In the first part of the study, we assessed the ability of the human eye to estimate the percent cartilage in a histological section. Twenty-nine rabbit periosteal explants that had been cultured in agarose transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) were selected so that the percentage of cartilage in the specimens was distributed equally from 0% to 100%. Color photomicrographs were evaluated by 5 expert observers who gave a visual estimate of the percent cartilage. There was a strong correlation between the estimated and actual percent cartilage (R(2) = 0.92, p < 0.0001) and among the observers (I.C.C. = 0.89). On average, the estimated percent cartilage was within ten percent of the actual percent measured. In the second part, we compared the data derived using a simple cartilage score with those obtained by automated image analysis. The histological slides from 159 explants cultured under various experimental conditions (14 treatment groups) in two different experiments were analyzed. The cartilage content was estimated visually and a score from 0 to 3 was assigned. A previously validated, computerized image analysis system was used to measure the actual percent cartilage. Statistical analyses revealed a good linear regression (R(2) = 0.84, p = 0.0001), and even better polynomial correlation between the actual measurement and the score (R(2) = 0.88, p = 0.0001). These data demonstrate the validity of a simple histological-histochemical subjective scoring system. A computerized automated program such as the one employed in this study is preferable due to its many advantages. However, a subjective scoring system may be appropriate to use when the funding and expertise required for a computerized image analysis program are not available.

A comparison of patients' responses about their disability with and without attribution to their affected area.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether individual items in a disability questionnaire were answered differently depending on whether or not the questions were attributed to the upper limb (i.e., "do you have difficulty eating due to your arm or hand problem?" or "do you have difficulty eating?", respectively). The a priori hypothesis was that the same or more disability would be detected by nonattributed items. Four hundred sixty-seven patients with upper extremity disorders completed the SF-36 general health survey, which does not attribute health problems to affected areas. Patients also completed six additional questions, modified from the SF-36, regarding work (four questions) and social function with friends and family (two questions), which attributed their disability to their affected upper extremity. Of 467 patients, 419-431 (89-92%) responded to both versions of the questions. Although we demonstrated a significant order effect (Generalized Estimating Equation; P=.003), comparison of the responses to the six questions showed that for five of the six questions (Generalized Estimating Equation; P< or = .001) patients reported more disability when the questions were worded with attribution to the upper extremity. Even considering the order effect, patients demonstrated a counterintuitive result by reporting more disability when questions were attributed to their affected area. Thus, both the wording of questions and order of questions can significantly affect patients' responses about their disability and raises questions about the validity of patients' reports of their disability.

Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee.

Reports of clinical studies of patients with knee disorders should routinely include their activity levels to enable comparison of treatment groups and to allow generalizability. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate a new rating scale to measure activity levels of patients. We assessed reliability by administering the scale to 40 subjects on 2 separate occasions, 1 week apart. Validity was evaluated by comparing the activity rating on the new scale with that from other instruments that use activity level scales (concurrent construct validity) and also by correlating the score on the new scale with age (divergent validity). Patients easily understood the scale and were able to complete it in 1 minute. The reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97). The scale also correlated well with existing activity rating scales: Spearman correlation coefficient for Cincinnati score, 0.67; for Tegner scale, 0.66; for Daniel scale, 0.52. The activity score was significantly inversely correlated with age (P = 0.002), indicating divergent validity. This instrument will facilitate generalizability of results and allow more accurate comparisons among patient groups in outcomes research in sports medicine.

Fractures about the orbit in professional American football players.

A retrospective review was performed of records for players who suffered fractures about the orbit during participation in officially sponsored activities of the National Football League from 1980 to 1997. Clinical information was obtained on 19 of 29 players who sustained orbital fractures. The most common signs and symptoms included decreased visual acuity (74%, 14), decreased eye movement (42%, 8), hyphema (37%, 7), and infraorbital numbness (21%, 4). The mechanisms of injury were a digital poke (74%, 14) and blunt facial trauma (26%, 5). There were significantly more orbital fractures than zygomatic fractures suffered by offensive linemen as compared with all other positions. Fifteen of 19 players were managed with surgical reconstruction; 4 players were treated nonoperatively. The mean time from injury to surgical procedure was 7.7 days (range, 0 to 42). The mean interval to follow-up was 45.6 months (range, 3 to 146). At follow-up examination, eight (53%) of the patients treated surgically still reported diplopia with upper field gaze. Three of the four patients treated nonoperatively were asymptomatic. The mean time lost from games or practice was 25 days (range, 5 to 56). Ultimately, 17 (89%) players with orbital fractures were able to return to full football activities. Two patients were unable to resume their careers because of residual visual impairment.

Patient factors affecting autologous and allogeneic blood transfusion rates in total hip arthroplasty.

Factors that place patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) at increased risk of receiving an allogeneic or autologous blood transfusion may aid in determining which patients should predonate blood. The records of 354 consecutive patients undergoing THA were retrospectively reviewed to determine patient factors related to transfusion requirement. The risk of transfusion requirement was most strongly correlated with low preoperative hemoglobin level, but also with older age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status rating, female sex, cemented arthroplasty, and revision surgery. These patients were also least likely to predonate blood, likely because of their comorbid status.

The figure-of-four view to evaluate ACL injury.

Standard arthroscopic assessment of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury through an anterior view can be sub-optimal for evaluation of the femoral origin, particularly the posterior component. The figure-of-four view provides increased exposure to the posterolateral aspect of the intercondylar notch, thereby facilitating diagnosis of proximal ACL injury and avulsions of the ACL origin.

Meniscal tears in the athlete. Operative and nonoperative management.

There are many factors to consider when treating an active individual with a known or suspected meniscal tear. The athlete with a meniscal tear sometimes can return to competition, temporarily delaying surgery until after the season. If an athlete remains symptomatic and is unable to return, however, then arthroscopic surgery generally is effective to allow the athlete to resume participation. The decision of meniscal repair versus excision must be carefully thought out and discussed with the athlete before surgery. Either treatment can allow the athlete to return to their sport. It is controversial whether or not an athlete should be allowed early return to play after meniscal repair. Further prospective randomized studies would provide useful information in deciding which type of treatment and which type of rehabilitation is best suited for the active individual.

Chondral injury following meniscal repair with a biodegradable implant.

This case report presents chondral damage associated with a resorbable meniscal repair implant. Although the devices may not have been inserted properly, surgeons using these implants should be aware of the potential severe chondral injury that may occur.

Non-invasive assessment of graft patency using transcutaneous Doppler echocardiography for the validation of functional improvement after PTCA of the LAD via internal thoracic artery graft.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of a native coronary artery via internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft after bypass surgery is a relatively rare procedure. Our current study evaluates the flow velocity patterns of the graft before and after PTCA. After intervention the mean diastolic flow velocity increased under rest and stress conditions. In addition, the graft patency was proved not before control angiography after 6 months. It could be verified that the measurement of flow velocity patterns under rest and stress conditions is a useful non-invasive procedure for monitoring long-term patency and PTCA-results of this vessel.

Self-perception in elite collegiate female gymnasts, cross-country runners, and track-and-field athletes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare self-perception between a group of competitive, elite female collegiate athletes (participating in gymnastics, cross country, and track and field) and a group of female political science students (nonathletic control subjects). We hypothesized that the athletic group would rate athletics as more important than would the nonathletic group, that the perception of athletic competence would correlate positively with self-worth for athletes only, and that the perception of athletic competence would have a stronger influence on self-worth in the athletic group. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Self-perception Profile for College Students was completed by 32 athletes and 13 nonathletes. This profile measures 12 subscales plus Global Self-worth independently and generates scores that reflect the subject's perceived importance of and competence in each of the subscale areas. RESULTS: The athletes rated athletics as more important than did nonathletes, although this trend was nonsignificant when adjusted for age. As age increased, the importance of athletics decreased for both groups. There was a direct relationship between perceived athletic competence and self-worth for the athletes but not for the nonathletes. Variables that accounted for the Global Self-worth score in athletes were perceptions of Competence subscales for Appearance, Social Acceptance, Friendship, and Job. Variables that accounted for the Global Self-worth scores in the nonathletes were perceptions of Competence subscales for Romance, Morality, Humor, and Appearance. The athletic group had significantly lower Global Self-worth scores than the nonathletic group. CONCLUSIONS: The female athletes in this study derived a large component of their self-worth from their perceived athletic competence. Clinicians should bear in mind the relative importance of athletics to young female athletes and the relationship of perceived athletic ability to self-worth when treating these individuals.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis after septic arthritis of the hip in an adolescent: report of a case.

Septic arthritis of the hip must be managed promptly to avoid the serious complications associated with the condition. In the case reported here, the diagnosis was delayed and was complicated by a slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The patient, an adolescent boy previously in good health, presented with a 2-week history of hip pain and systemic illness. Septic arthritis was diagnosed and was managed by incision and drainage and antibiotic therapy. Two weeks later he presented with a subcutaneous abscess and a slipped capital femoral epiphysis, which was pinned in situ. There was a 2.5-cm leg-length discrepancy. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head subsequently developed leaving the boy with a permanent disability.

How should importance and severity ratings be combined for item reduction in the development of health status instruments?

Patients' ratings of the severity and importance of items are often used to select items for health status instruments. The purpose of this study was to compare six different methods of combining severity-importance ratings. Two different patient groups separately rated the importance and severity of their complaints; (i) 76 patients with upper-extremity disorders rated 70 upper-extremity-related questions; and (ii) 86 patients with hip arthrosis rated 22 questions relating to their hip problem. The rank ordering of the items using the six different methods in the two populations were very similar (tau(bi) = 0.91 and 0.87, respectively). Furthermore, the six methods when used to choose 30 upper-extremity items shared 25 items in common and shared 9 (of 10) hip items in the second group. In conclusion, the results of item reduction were not affected by the method of creating importance-severity ratings.