Mechanism of ERBB2 gene overexpression by the formation of super-enhancer with genomic structural abnormalities in lung adenocarcinoma without clinically actionable genetic alterations.

BACKGROUND: In an extensive genomic analysis of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), driver mutations have been recognized as potential targets for molecular therapy. However, there remain cases where target genes are not identified. Super-enhancers and structural variants are frequently identified in several hundred loci per case. Despite this, most cancer research has approached the analysis of these data sets separately, without merging and comparing the data, and there are no examples of integrated analysis in LUAD. METHODS: We performed an integrated analysis of super-enhancers and structural variants in a cohort of 174 LUAD cases that lacked clinically actionable genetic alterations. To achieve this, we conducted both WGS and H3K27Ac ChIP-seq analyses using samples with driver gene mutations and those without, allowing for a comprehensive investigation of the potential roles of super-enhancer in LUAD cases. RESULTS: We demonstrate that most genes situated in these overlapped regions were associated with known and previously unknown driver genes and aberrant expression resulting from the formation of super-enhancers accompanied by genomic structural abnormalities. Hi-C and long-read sequencing data further corroborated this insight. When we employed CRISPR-Cas9 to induce structural abnormalities that mimicked cases with outlier ERBB2 gene expression, we observed an elevation in ERBB2 expression. These abnormalities are associated with a higher risk of recurrence after surgery, irrespective of the presence or absence of driver mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that aberrant gene expression linked to structural polymorphisms can significantly impact personalized cancer treatment by facilitating the identification of driver mutations and prognostic factors, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of LUAD pathogenesis.

Passive Smoking-Induced Mutagenesis as a Promoter of Lung Carcinogenesis.

INTRODUCTION: The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified passive smoking (PS) or secondhand smoke exposure as a group 1 carcinogen linked to lung cancer. However, in contrast to active smoking, the mutagenic properties of PS remain unclear. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 564 lung adenocarcinoma samples from female never-smokers, who provided detailed information about their exposure to PS during adolescence and in their thirties through a questionnaire, was prepared. Of these, all 291 cases for whom frozen tumor tissues were available were subjected to whole exome sequencing to estimate tumor mutational burden, and the top 84 cases who were exposed daily, or not, to PS during adolescence, in their thirties or in both periods, were further subjected to whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: A modest yet statistically significant increase in tumor mutational burden was observed in the group exposed to PS compared with the group not exposed to PS (median values = 1.44 versus 1.29 per megabase, respectively; p = 0.020). Instead of inducing driver oncogene mutations, PS-induced substantial subclonal mutations exhibiting APOBEC-type signatures, including SMAD4 and ADGRG6 hotspot mutations. A polymorphic APOBEC3A/3B allele-specific to the Asian population that leads to up-regulated expression of APOBEC3A accentuated the mutational load in individuals exposed daily to PS during adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that PS-induced mutagenesis can promote lung carcinogenesis. The APOBEC3A/3B polymorphism may serve as a biomarker for identifying passive nonsmoking individuals at high risk of developing lung cancer.