2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

Joint Hypermobility, Autonomic Dysfunction, Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Autoimmune markers (JAG-A): Clinical Associations and Response to Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: We examined autoimmunity markers (AIM) and autonomic dysfunction in patients with chronic neurogastroenterological symptoms and their relationship to joint hypermobility/hypermobility spectrum disorder (JH/HSD). METHODS: AIM positivity was defined as a diagnosis of known autoimmune/autoinflammatory disorder (AIDX) with at least one positive seromarker of autoimmunity or at least two positive seromarkers by themselves. Three cohorts were studied: (a) Retrospective (n = 300); (b) Prospective validation cohort (n =133); and (c) Treatment cohort (n=40), administered open-label intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). RESULTS: AIM positivity was found in 40% and 29% of the retrospective and prospective cohorts, the majority of whom (71% and 69%, respectively) had AIDX. Significantly more patients with AIM had elevations of C-reactive protein (31% versus 15%, p<0.001) along with an increased proportion of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction (48% versus 29%; p<.001), small fiber neuropathy (20% versus 9%; p=.002).8) and HLADQ8 positivity (24% versus 13%, p=.01). JH/HSD patients were more likely to have AIM (43% versus 15%, p=.001) along with more severe autonomic and gastrointestinal symptom scores. IVIG treatment was associated with robust improvement in pain, gastrointestinal and autonomic symptoms but adverse events were experienced by 62% patients. CONCLUSIONS: Autoimmune markers and autonomic dysfunction are common in patients with unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms, especially in those with JH/HSD. Many patients seem to respond to IVIG treatment but this needs to be confirmed by controlled trials. These results highlight the need for vigilance for autoimmune and autonomic factors and JH/HSD in patients with neurogastroenterological disorders. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04859829.

A multi-national survey to identify clinicians' perspectives concerning Proton Pump inhibitors in patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in SSc for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, there is little evidence to support their empirical use and long-term safety has been questioned. Our objective was to better describe clinicians' attitudes toward PPIs prescription and use in SSc patients. METHODS: Clinicians involved in the care of SSc patients were invited through international physician networks and social media to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: Responses from 227 clinicians from 36 countries were evaluable. The majority 'agreed' (41.4 %) or 'strongly agreed' (45.4 %) that GERD is a major cause of morbidity in SSc. Lifestyle modifications are seldom (16 %) considered effective. Only half 'agreed' (43 %) or 'strongly agreed' (11 %) there is solid evidence supporting PPIs efficacy in SSc. The most common reasons for PPIs prescription were symptomatic GERD unresponsive to lifestyle modification (95 %), objective evidence of GERD (82 %), and hoarseness or respiratory symptoms (71 %). There are variable concerns about PPIs long-term safety in SSc. The three highest (mean) reasons (0-10, here 10 is 'very concerned') were: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (5.5), osteoporosis (5.4), and drug interactions (5.2). There are significant differences in attitudes towards surgery for refractory GERD, and concerns about potential complications. PPIs may have a putative role for disease modification (e.g., ILD and calcinosis), and the role of immunosuppression is uncertain for GI (gastrointestinal) disease in SSc. CONCLUSION: PPIs are frequently prescribed in SSc. Side effects are a recognized concern, especially regarding long-term therapy. There is significant variation in attitudes towards surgical intervention. Future research and practical treatment recommendation for PPIs in SSc are urgently needed.

Patients' unmet needs and treatment preferences concerning digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Digital ulcers (DUs) significantly impact on quality of life and function in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of our survey was to explore patients' perspectives and their unmet needs concerning SSc-DUs. MATERIALS: SSc patients were invited through international patient associations and social media to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: 358 responses were obtained from 34 countries: US (65.6%), UK (11.5%) and Canada (4.5%). Recurrent DUs are common: >10 DUs (46.1%), 5-10 DUs (21.5%), 1-5 DUs (28.5%), 1 DU (3.9%). Fingertip DUs were most frequent (84.9%), followed by those overlying the interphalangeal joints (50.8%). The impact of DUs in patients is broad, from broad-ranging emotional impacts to impact on activities of daily living, and personal relationships. Half (51.7%) of respondents reported that they received wound/ulcer care, most often provided by non-specialist wound care clinics (63.8%). There was significant variation in local (wound) DU care, in particular the use of debridement and pain management. DU-related education was only provided to one-third of patients. One-quarter (24.6%) were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' that the provided DU treatment(s) relieved their DU symptoms. Pain, limited hand function, and ulcer duration/chronicity were the main reasons for patients to consider changing DU treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that there is a large variation in DU treatment between countries. Patient access to specialist wound-care services is limited and only a small proportion of patients had their DU needs met. Moreover, patient education is often neglected. Evidence-based treatment pathways are urgently needed for DU management.

Anti-Gephyrin Antibodies: A Novel Specificity in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis and Lower Bowel Dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Autoantibodies are clinically useful in phenotyping patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Gastrointestinal (GI) function is regulated by the enteric nervous system (ENS) and commonly impaired in SSc, suggesting that the SSc autoimmune response may target ENS antigens. We sought to identify novel anti-ENS autoantibodies with an aim to clinically phenotype SSc GI dysfunction. METHODS: Serum from a patient with SSc with GI dysfunction but without defined SSc-associated autoantibodies was used for autoantibody discovery. Immunoprecipitations performed with murine myenteric plexus lysates were on-bead digested, and autoantigens were identified by mass spectrometry. Prevalence was determined, and clinical features associated with novel autoantibodies were evaluated in a SSc cohort using regression analyses. The expression of gephyrin in human GI tract tissue was examined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: We identified gephyrin as a novel SSc autoantigen. Anti-gephyrin antibodies were present in 9% of patients with SSc (16/188) and absent in healthy controls (0/46). Anti-gephyrin antibody-positive patients had higher constipation scores (1.00 vs 0.50, P = 0.02) and were more likely to have severe constipation and severe distention/bloating (46% vs 15%, P = 0.005; 54% vs 25%, P = 0.023, respectively). Anti-gephyrin antibody levels were significantly higher among patients with severe constipation (0.04 vs 0.00; P = 0.001) and severe distention and bloating (0.03 vs 0.004; P = 0.010). Severe constipation was associated with anti-gephyrin antibodies even in the adjusted model. Importantly, gephyrin was expressed in the ENS, which regulates gut motility. CONCLUSION: Gephyrin is a novel ENS autoantigen that is expressed in human myenteric ganglia. Anti-gephyrin autoantibodies are associated with the presence and severity of constipation in patients with SSc.

A Multinational Survey Investigating the Unmet Needs and Patient Perspectives Concerning Proton Pump Inhibitors in Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). However, not all patients adequately respond to the treatment, and there are frequent concerns about the safety of long-term use of PPIs. Our aim was to identify the main problems/complaints of SSc patients on PPIs, as well as understand their unmet needs. METHODS: SSc patients treated with PPIs were invited through international patient associations and social media to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: We gathered 301 valid responses from 14 countries (United Kingdom 19.3% and United States 70.4%). Multiple PPIs use (two: 30% and three: 21% in series) was common. The majority (89%) reported improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms from receiving PPIs. Side effects attributed to receiving PPIs were uncommon (19%); however, most (79%) were potentially concerned. Around half (58%) had received lifestyle information, and most (85%) had searched online for information about PPIs. Only in the minority (12%) had a surgical approach been discussed; however, half (46%) indicated that they would be willing to undergo surgery to resolve their GERD symptoms but had important concerns. CONCLUSION: Despite the frequent use of PPIs in patients with SSc, there is significant heterogeneity in prescription, and combination therapy (PPIs plus other medication for acid reflux) is not uncommon (approximately 40%). Patients have significant concerns about PPIs side effects. Education about PPIs is often neglected, and patients very frequently use online sources to obtain information on drug treatment. A surgical approach is infrequently discussed, and patients fear this potential therapeutic approach.

Risk of Malnutrition in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Treated With Nintedanib in the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled SENSCIS Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess adverse events (AEs) in relation to baseline body mass index (BMI) and the risk of malnutrition in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) treated with nintedanib. METHODS: Among patients with SSc-ILD randomized to receive nintedanib or placebo in the SENSCIS trial, we assessed AEs in subgroups by baseline BMI ≤20 kg/m2 and BMI >20 kg/m2 , and the risk of malnutrition using a modified version of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), over 52 weeks. RESULTS: The AE profile of nintedanib was similar between subgroups with a baseline BMI ≤20 kg/m2 (n = 61) and a baseline BMI >20 kg/m2 (n = 515). In these subgroups, respectively, AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 16.7% and 15.9% of the nintedanib group and 13.5% and 8.0% of the placebo group, respectively. Based on the modified MUST, the proportions of patients who had a low risk of malnutrition at baseline and at their last assessment were 74.0% in the nintedanib group and 78.1% in the placebo group, while the proportions who were classified as at low risk at baseline but at high risk by their last assessment were 4.5% in the nintedanib group and 1.0% in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: In the SENSCIS trial, most patients with SSc-ILD remained at low risk of malnutrition over 52 weeks, but the proportion at high risk was higher in patients who received treatment with nintedanib compared to those who received placebo. Management of disease manifestations and AEs that may be associated with weight loss is important to reduce the risk of malnutrition in patients with SSc-ILD.

Clinical Features Associated With Rate of Fractures in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: A US Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with several specific risk factors for fracture due to the complications of the disease and related medications. The present study was undertaken to examine the relationship between SSc-associated clinical features and fracture rate in a large US cohort. METHODS: Participants with SSc in FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, were included (1998-2019). Age- and sex-matched individuals with osteoarthritis (OA) from the same database were included as comparators. The primary end point was self-reported major osteoporotic fracture. Cox proportional hazards models were used to study the associations between risk factors and fractures. RESULTS: The study included 922 individuals (SSc patients, n = 154; OA patients, n = 768). Eighty-seven percent were female, with a mean age of 57.8 years. Fifty-one patients developed at least 1 fracture during a median of 4.2 years (0.5-22.0 years) of follow-up. Patients with SSc had more frequent fractures compared to OA comparators (hazard ratio [HR] 2.38 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.47-3.83]). Among patients with SSc, a higher Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index score (HR 1.45 [95% CI 1.20-1.75]) and a higher Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index score (HR 3.83 [95% CI 2.12-6.93]) were associated with more fractures. Diabetes mellitus (HR 5.89 [95% CI 2.51-13.82]) and renal disease (HR 2.43 [95% CI 1.10-5.37]) were independently associated with fracture among SSc patients relative to SSc patients without these comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight factors associated with fracture among patients with SSc. Disability as measured by the HAQ DI is a particularly strong indicator of fracture rate in SSc. Improving SSc patients' functional status, where possible, may lead to better long-term outcomes.

Gastrointestinal Tract Considerations Part I: How Should a Rheumatologist Best Manage Common Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Complaints in Systemic Sclerosis?

The upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is frequently involved in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and may impact quality of life, physical function and survival. Although we are currently very proactive in terms of screening for heart and lung involvement, patients with SSc are not routinely screened for GI involvement. This review details the available investigations for common upper GI symptoms in SSc, including dysphagia, reflux and bloating and provides advice as to how to integrate these investigations into current clinical care.

Gastrointestinal Tract Considerations: Part II: How Should a Rheumatologist Best Manage Common Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Complaints in Systemic Sclerosis?

Lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are a frequently encountered problem for clinicians managing patients with systemic sclerosis. The current management practices are focused on the treatment of symptoms with little information available on how to use GI investigations in daily practice. This review demonstrates how to integrate the objective assessment of common lower GI symptoms into clinical care with the aim of guiding clinical decision making. Understanding the type of abnormal GI function that is affecting a patient and determining which parts of the gut are impacted can help clinicians to target therapy more precisely.

Gastrointestinal tract involvement in systemic sclerosis: The roles of diet and the microbiome.

BACKGROUND: Alterations in gastrointestinal (GI) microbial composition have been reported in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, it is unclear to what degree these alterations and/or dietary changes contribute to the SSc-GI phenotype. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to 1) evaluate the relationship between GI microbial composition and SSc-GI symptoms, and 2) compare GI symptoms and GI microbial composition between SSc patients adhering to a low versus non-low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet. METHODS: Adult SSc patients were consecutively recruited to provide stool specimens for bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Patients completed the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument (GIT 2.0) and the Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) II and were classified as adhering to a low or non-low FODMAP diet. GI microbial differences were assessed using three metrics of alpha diversity (species richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity), as well as beta diversity (overall microbial composition). Differential abundance analysis was performed to identify specific genera associated with SSc-GI phenotype and low versus non-low FODMAP diet. RESULTS: Of the 66 total SSc patients included, the majority were women (n = 56) with a mean disease duration of 9.6 years. Thirty-five participants completed the DHQ II. Increased severity of GI symptoms (total GIT 2.0 score) was associated with decreased species diversity and differences in GI microbial composition. Specifically, pathobiont genera (e.g., Klebsiella and Enterococcus) were significantly more abundant in patients with increased GI symptom severity. When comparing low (N = 19) versus non-low (N = 16) FODMAP groups, there were no significant differences in GI symptom severity or in alpha and beta diversity. Compared with the low FODMAP group, the non-low FODMAP group had greater abundance of the pathobiont Enterococcus. CONCLUSION: SSc patients reporting more severe GI symptoms exhibited GI microbial dysbiosis characterized by less species diversity and alterations in microbial composition. A low FODMAP diet was not associated with significant alterations in GI microbial composition or reduced SSc-GI symptoms; however, randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the impact of specific diets on GI symptoms in SSc.

Antivinculin Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: Associations With Slow Gastric Transit and Extraintestinal Clinical Phenotype.

OBJECTIVE: The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is commonly affected in systemic sclerosis (SSc). A positive association between antivinculin antibody levels and GI symptom severity is reported in SSc. We sought to examine whether antivinculin antibodies associate with measures of GI dysmotility and extraintestinal clinical phenotype in SSc. METHODS: A total of 88 well-characterized patients with SSc and GI disease were assayed for antivinculin antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Whole-gut scintigraphy, GI symptom scores, and clinical features of SSc were compared between patients with and without antibodies. RESULTS: Twenty of 88 (23%) patients had antivinculin antibodies, which were more prevalent in patients with slow gastric transit (35% versus 22%). In the univariate analyses, patients who were positive for antivinculin antibodies were more likely to have limited cutaneous disease (odds ratio [OR] 9.60 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.19, 77.23]) and thyroid disease (OR 4.09 [95% CI 1.27, 13.21]). Such patients were also less likely to have lung involvement based on a Medsger Severity Score of ≥2 (OR 0.25 [95% CI 0.07, 0.92]). Higher levels of antivinculin autoantibodies were associated with less gastric emptying (ß coefficient -3.41 [95% CI -6.72, -0.09]). The association between antivinculin antibodies and each of these clinical features remained significant in the multivariable model. In particular, the presence of antivinculin antibodies (ß coefficient -6.20 [95% CI -12.33, -0.063]) and higher levels of antivinculin antibodies (ß coefficient -3.64 [95% CI -7.05, -0.23]) were each significantly associated with slower gastric transit. CONCLUSION: Antivinculin antibodies associate with slower gastric transit in SSc and may provide insight into GI complications of SSc.

Systemic sclerosis gastrointestinal dysmotility: risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.

Nearly all patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are negatively affected by dysfunction in the gastrointestinal tract, and the severity of gastrointestinal disease in SSc correlates with high mortality. The clinical complications of this dysfunction are heterogeneous and include gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, malabsorption and the requirement for total parenteral nutrition. The abnormal gastrointestinal physiology that promotes the clinical manifestations of SSc gastrointestinal disease throughout the gastrointestinal tract are diverse and present a range of therapeutic targets. Furthermore, the armamentarium of medications and non-pharmacological interventions that can benefit affected patients has substantially expanded in the past 10 years, and research is increasingly focused in this area. Here, we review the details of the gastrointestinal complications in SSc, tie physiological abnormalities to clinical manifestations, detail the roles of standard and novel therapies and lay a foundation for future investigative work.

Slow Colonic Transit in Systemic Sclerosis: An Objective Assessment of Risk Factors and Clinical Phenotype.

OBJECTIVE: Up to 50% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) experience slow colonic transit, which may be associated with severe outcomes. Our objective, therefore, was to identify specific clinical features associated with slow colonic transit in SSc. METHODS: SSc patients with gastrointestinal symptoms were prospectively enrolled and completed a scintigraphy-based whole gut transit study. Clinical features were compared between patients with and without slow colonic transit in univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 100 patients (48%) in our cohort had slow colonic transit. In the univariate analyses, slow colonic transit was positively associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR] 12.61 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.56-101.90]), telangiectasia (OR 4.00 [95% CI 1.32-12.10]), anticentromere antibodies (OR 3.25 [95% CI 1.25-8.44]), prior or current smoking (OR 2.56 [95% CI 1.06-6.21]), and a Medsger gastrointestinal severity score of ≥3 (OR 3.94 [95% CI 1.16-13.36]). Patients were less likely to have significant restriction on pulmonary function tests (OR 0.23 [95% CI 0.09-0.63]). In our multivariable model, the association between slow colonic transit and telangiectasia (OR 3.97 [95% CI 1.20-13.20]) and less restrictive lung disease on pulmonary function tests (OR 0.28 [95% CI 0.09-0.86]) remained statistically significant, though a trend with smoking remained (OR 2.16 [95% CI 0.82-5.75]). Interestingly, there were no significant associations between slow colonic transit and delayed transit in other regions of the gastrointestinal tract. CONCLUSION: Distinct clinical features are associated with slow colonic transit in SSc. Such features may provide insight in risk stratification and the study of disease mechanism in more homogeneous subgroups.