Attitudes of Malaysian Speech-Language Pathologists and Speech-Language Pathology Students Toward Stuttering.

INTRODUCTION: Attitudes of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) toward stuttering play an important role in managing stuttering cases. Yet, such studies had not been studied in Malaysia, a country that is still developing the profession of speech-language pathology. This study aimed to explore the attitudes of Malaysian SLPs and speech-language pathology students toward stuttering. METHODS: A total of 50 SLPs and 67 speech-language pathology students completed the Clinician Attitudes Towards Stuttering (CATS) inventory. There were eight domains of attitudes toward stuttering: (a) etiology, (b) early intervention, (c) therapeutic efficacy, (d) personalities of PWS, (e) clinician expertise and roles, (f) teacher/counsellor roles and client/public reactions, (g) therapy strategies, and (h) parent attitudes. Descriptive data were presented and Multivariate Analysis of Variance was conducted to examine the effects of clinical certification on the eight domains of attitudes toward stuttering. RESULTS: Participants who possessed a clinical certification were more accepting toward the personalities of people who stutter (PWS) and therapy strategies. On the other hand, participants without a clinical certification were more accepting toward clinician expertise and roles. CONCLUSIONS: Current curriculum and professional training should be re-evaluated to remediate less accepting stereotypes held by SLPs and students toward PWS and to enhance essential skills such as counselling.

Public attitudes toward stuttering in Malaysia.

PURPOSE: This study aims to: (a) measure public attitudes toward stuttering in Malaysia using the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attitudes-Stuttering [POSHA-S], (b) determine how reported attitudes and knowledge related to stuttering compare to existing data, and (c) determine whether there are differences between groups for identified variables. METHOD: A total of 250 adults (mean age = 29 years; range = 19-60 years) completed the POSHA-S in English. We compared this sample's attitudes toward stuttering to POSHA-S data from other global samples. General linear modeling examined differences in overall stuttering score, beliefs, and self reaction subscores for demographic variables such as age, gender, marital status, parenting, education, employment status, prior exposure to a person who stutters, multilingual, race, and religion. RESULTS: The Malaysian participants' overall stuttering score and the beliefs and self reactions subscores were all considerably lower (i.e., less positive) than the other samples around the world from the POSHA-S database median values. Being male, receiving a higher education, and knowing someone who stutters were linked to having more positive self reactions, but none of those factors was linked to positive or negative beliefs. Those who had previously been exposed to stuttering scored significantly higher than those who had not. CONCLUSION: Malaysians may have less positive attitudes toward stuttering than Westerners. More needs to be done to make society more accepting of people who stutter. Future research should aim to find ways to educate and to raise public awareness about stuttering.

Current practices of Malaysian speech-language pathologists working with dysarthria.

Purpose: This study investigated the practice patterns used by Malaysian speech-language pathologists (SLPs) with patients with dysarthria, identified challenges perceived by SLPs and explored strategies to address perceived barriers for improving dysarthria management.Method: Two studies were conducted. Study 1 disseminated a 30-item survey questionnaire electronically via google link to SLPs in the Malaysian Speech-Language-Hearing Association through e-mail lists. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. In Study 2, semi-structured interviews of twelve SLPs who managed patients with dysarthria were conducted. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the thematic analysis method.Result: Three major themes and ten sub-themes emerged from the interviews, including "assessment and treatment practices", "challenges", and "overcoming challenges". SLPs' practice of assessment and treatment of dysarthria were predominantly impairment-based. Respondents (64%) who never used standardised assessment tools valued textbooks more as sources of evidence and had a lower level of confidence in their knowledge about dysarthria compared to those who used standardised tools.Conclusion: Focus now needs to be on the education needs of our SLPs, on both the university training and continuing education levels, for direction of the development of professional training courses. Ongoing research and public awareness are required to guide clinical management decisions.

Exploring attitudes about evidence-based practice among speech-language pathologists: A survey of Japan and Malaysia.

Purpose: To investigate speech-language pathologists' current perceptions, previous training experiences, resources, barriers, and training needs in terms of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in two Asian countries.Method: Their knowledge and attitudes about EBP were explored using an online questionnaire. A descriptive analysis was conducted with consideration of the effect of demographic variables on knowledge and attitudes about EBP.Result: Malaysian speech-language pathologists (n = 98) displayed more positive attitudes toward EBPs, with a significantly higher (t (143) = 5.91, p < .01) total mean score (Mean = 120.7, SD = 11) compared to the Japanese speech-language pathologists (n = 47, Mean = 107.8, SD = 13.5). Malaysian practitioners who were female, worked full-time, and worked in government settings reported higher motivation to develop EBP skills. Japanese practitioners who worked in private sectors reported higher EBPs training needs than those in government settings. In both countries, speech-language pathologists with higher education levels tended to express fewer perceived barriers towards EBP.Conclusion: Findings could help local governance and speech-language pathologist associations to understand the current practices and professional development needs of speech-language pathologists, leading to more effective training programs and educating employers and managers who can reinforce EBP among practitioners.