Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 42(12): 1340-1343, 2024 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394473

RESUMEN

Why, when, and how to consider external control cohorts in pediatric brain tumor clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Niño , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología
2.
Neuro Oncol ; 24(8): 1219-1229, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35380705

RESUMEN

Imaging response assessment is a cornerstone of patient care and drug development in oncology. Clinicians/clinical researchers rely on tumor imaging to estimate the impact of new treatments and guide decision making for patients and candidate therapies. This is important in brain cancer, where associations between tumor size/growth and emerging neurological deficits are strong. Accurately measuring the impact of a new therapy on tumor growth early in clinical development, where patient numbers are small, would be valuable for decision making regarding late-stage development activation. Current attempts to measure the impact of a new therapy have limited influence on clinical development, as determination of progression, stability or response does not currently account for individual tumor growth kinetics prior to the initiation of experimental therapies. Therefore, we posit that imaging-based response assessment, often used as a tool for estimating clinical effect, is incomplete as it does not adequately account for growth trajectories or biological characteristics of tumors prior to the introduction of an investigational agent. Here, we propose modifications to the existing framework for evaluating imaging assessment in primary brain tumors that will provide a more reliable understanding of treatment effects. Measuring tumor growth trajectories prior to a given intervention may allow us to more confidently conclude whether there is an anti-tumor effect. This updated approach to imaging-based tumor response assessment is intended to improve our ability to select candidate therapies for later-stage development, including those that may not meet currently sought thresholds for "response" and ultimately lead to identification of effective treatments.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Neuro Oncol ; 23(8): 1252-1260, 2021 08 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33822177

RESUMEN

On July 24, 2020, a workshop sponsored by the National Brain Tumor Society was held on innovating brain tumor clinical trials based on lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience. Various stakeholders from the brain tumor community participated including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and community clinicians, researchers, industry, clinical research organizations, patients and patient advocates, and representatives from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the National Cancer Institute. This report summarizes the workshop and proposes ways to incorporate lessons learned from COVID-19 to brain tumor clinical trials including the increased use of telemedicine and decentralized trial models as opportunities for practical innovation with potential long-term impact on clinical trial design and implementation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , COVID-19 , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Humanos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA