Vulvar biopsy: Punch biopsy or cervical forceps biopsy?

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of our study is to investigate the rate of non-contributory biopsies between punch biopsy(PB) and cervical forceps biopsy(CFB) for a vulvar lesion seen in consultation. The secondary objective of our study is to evaluate the rate of underestimation of a more severe lesion for patients who have undergone vulvar excision. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a retrospective, descriptive, and comparative study conducted at three centers. The study population consisted of patients who underwent vulvar biopsy between 2017 and 2022 in a gynecological surgery consultation at two French hospitals, as well as a city office. The biopsy techniques used were punch or cervical forceps biopsy. Quantitative variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, while Pearson's or Fisher's Xi2 tests were used for qualitative variables. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study of 179 vulvar biopsies, of which 100 were punch biopsies and 79 were cervical forceps biopsies, from a total of 107 patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of non-contributory biopsies between the PB and CB groups (p = 1). When analyzing the secondary endpoint of our study, which included 68 patients who underwent vulvectomy after vulvar biopsy, we found that 66 patients (97%) had a good correlation between the pathology of the vulvar biopsy and that of the vulvectomy specimen. CONCLUSION: Vulvar biopsy techniques using punch or cervical forceps appear to have similar diagnostic performance and are associated with comparable and low rates of underestimation of invasive lesions.

Impact of cervical excisional dimensions on endocervical margins status in adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: A multicenter study from the FRANCOGYN group.

OBJECTIVE: Excisional procedures have a central role in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix (AIS). We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the excisional specimen dimensions and the endocervical margin status. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric retrospective study in seven French centers. All cases with proven AIS on a colposcopic biopsy and undergoing an excisional procedure afterwards were included in the analysis. We evaluated the impact of excision length, along with the lateral and anteroposterior diameters on the endocervical margin status. An additional subgroup analysis of the impact of maternal age on endocervical margin status was also conducted. RESULTS: Of the 101 cases of AIS diagnosed on initial biopsy, 95 underwent a primary excisional procedure, among which 80% (n = 76/95) had uninvolved endocervical margins and 20% (n = 19/95) had positive endocervical margins. The excisional specimen length was not significantly related to the endocervical margin status. Conversely, both lateral and antero-posterior diameters were significantly correlated with the negative endocervical margins status: OR = 1,19, 95% CI [1.03, 1.40], p = 0.025, for the lateral diameter and OR = 1.34, 95% CI [1.14, 1.64], p = 0.001 for the antero-posterior diameter. The median lateral diameter was 20 mm, IQR (18, 24) in case of endocervical negative margins vs. 18 mm IQR (15, 24) in case of positive endocervical margins (p = 0.039), and the median anteroposterior diameter was 17 mm IQR (15, 20) in case of negative endocervical margins vs 14 mm IQR (11, 15) in case of positive endocervical margins (p = 0.004), respectively.  Additionally, in patients over 45 years old, endocervical margin were more likely to be positive despite similar excisional dimensions (7/17 (41%) of positive endocercival margins before 45 years old vs 12/78 (15%) after, p = 0.039) CONCLUSIONS: Endocervical margin statues were significantly related to the transverse diameters (lateral and anteroposterior diameters), but not to the excision specimen length. Reducing the excised length may lead to fewer post-procedure complications but would still allow to obtain a large proportion of negative endocervical margins.

Laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Effectiveness and obstetric outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and obstetric outcomes after laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: This retrospective study included 757 patients who underwent laser conization between 2014 and 2020. Patients with a diagnosis of invasive lesions or adenocarcinoma in situ were excluded. Histological data from the conization specimen, pre and postoperative histological and virological data (Human PapillomaVirus (HPV) test) and obstetric outcomes were collected from the medical record. The primary endpoint was the negative surgical margin rates after laser conization. The secondary endpoint were the size of the operative specimen, the postoperative virological test results (3 to 6 months after surgery), factors associated with negative or positive margin and postoperative obstetric outcomes (prematurity). Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared using Student's t-test, χ² test, or Fisher exact test. Values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: This study included 757 patients. Negative surgical margins were obtained in 76.1% of the cases and were associated with more negative HPV tests at 6 months (64.9% vs. 52.5%, p = 0.006) and fewer repeat surgeries (0.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.013) than for patients with positive margins. Among the patients under 43 years at the time of conization, 71 achieved a pregnancy with a term >22 weeks, and of these 66 (93%) delivered at term (≥37 weeks). CONCLUSION: Laser conization appears to be an effective technique for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia both in terms of the quality of the resection margins and the obstetric prognosis.

HPV testing and vaccination in Europe.

Current cytology-based screening has a moderate sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) and cervical cancer even in those states providing rigorous quality control of their cervical screening programs. The impact of vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 as well as the incorporation of HPV testing on the detection of CIN 3 and cancer is discussed. HPV testing used as a triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, test of cure after treatment, and HPV-based primary screening may improve current cervical screening programs.HPV testing as a triage test for ASCUS seems to offer an improved sensitivity, with a similar specificity as compared to repeat cytology for diagnosing high-grade CIN and has been recommended throughout most EU states. HPV testing as a triage test for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions has a low specificity and is not recommended in most member states. HPV test of cure offers an improved sensitivity compared to cytology for women with persistent cervical precancer after treatment. HPV-based cervical cancer screening is more effective than screening with cytology. The effects of HPV-based screening depend on the organization of the program and on adherence to algorithms for screening triage. Otherwise, it is likely that HPV-based screening will increase the referral rate to colposcopy including more women with no detectable cervical lesion. HPV vaccination will require many years to evaluate any beneficial effects on cervical cancer incidence and mortality.

The future role for colposcopy in Europe.

Improvements in the performance of cervical screening may be limited by the diagnostic performance of colposcopy. Nonetheless, colposcopy remains the best available tool to assess women considered at high risk for having or developing cervical cancer. The provision and role of colposcopy across Europe is variable. Introduction of vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 as well as the possible switch to HPV-based screening is likely to change the profiles of women presenting to colposcopy services and provide management difficulties for the colposcopist.The standard of colposcopy in Europe can be maintained or improved despite a variable availability of screening. The prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 may decrease for women having had HPV vaccination. The incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cervical cancer in second and subsequent rounds of HPV-based screening are likely to decrease compared to cytology-based screening. In HPV-based screening, the numbers of women with no detectable or minor abnormalities at colposcopy and with screen-detected glandular disease are likely to increase. We have considered how these issues will affect states that have varying implementation of organized cervical screening programs and varying degrees of implementation of HPV testing or vaccination.The development of quality assurance across Europe accompanying these program changes is discussed.

Office hysteroscopy for infertility: a series of 557 consecutive cases.

Objective. To study incidence of abnormal hysteroscopic findings according to age. Methods. We retrospectively studied 557 consecutive office hysteroscopies in patients referred for incapacity to conceive lasting at least 1 year or prior to in vitro fertilization. Rates of abnormal findings were reviewed according to age. Results. In 219 cases, hysteroscopy showed an abnormality and more than a third of our population had abnormal findings that could be related to infertility. Rates of abnormal findings ranged from 30% at 30 years to more than 60% after 42 years. Risk of abnormal finding was multiplied by a factor of 1.5 every 5 years. Conclusion. Our data are an additional argument to propose office hysteroscopy as part of first-line exams in infertile woman, regardless of age.

Long-term results of hysteroscopic myomectomy in 235 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of transcervical resection of submucous fibroids according to type and size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective follow-up of 235 women with submucous fibroids at outpatient hysteroscopy who underwent a hysteroscopic transcervical resection. The main indications were the abnormal uterine bleeding and fertility problems. Thirty-seven percent of patients had an associated endometrial ablation and 32% had a polyp resection. Fifty-one percent of women were menopausal. In cases of incomplete resection a repeat procedure was offered. RESULTS: Intra-operative complications were rare (2.6%) and there was no major complication. Eighty-four percent of cases were followed-up. The median follow-up was 40 months (range 18-66 months). The procedure was classed as a success in 94.4% of patients. Among the cases that were classed as a failure, four patients had a repeated hysteroscopic procedure, three patients had a subsequent hysterectomy and four patients presented with abnormal uterine bleeding at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The hysteroscopic transcervical resection of submucous fibroids is a safe and highly effective long-term therapy for carefully selected women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding and fertility problems. It produces satisfactory long-term results with few complications.

The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of Pipelle Mark II sampling (designed for combined cytology and histology testing) in the diagnosis of endometrial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 97 women with abnormal uterine bleeding or intrauterine lesions on ultrasound examination underwent Pipelle Mark II endometrial sampling, followed by diagnostic hysteroscopy. The adequacy of endometrial samples obtained for cytological and histological analysis was assessed. A correlation was established between endometrial cytology, histology and diagnostic hysteroscopy results. Where discrepancies were found, they were compared with the histological results obtained from operative hysteroscopy. RESULTS: The tissue samples obtained for cytological and histological diagnoses were insufficient in 14.4% and 11.3% of patients, respectively. The opposite was found in the group of postmenopausal women (N=52): the tissue samples for cytological and histological diagnoses were insufficient in only 3.8% and 15.4% of cases, respectively. The cytological results corroborated diagnostic hysteroscopy findings and histological results in all cases but 3 (3.6%). Only two cases of endometrial carcinoma were reported in this group of patients, and they were both detected by all three methods. The rate of false positives with endometrial cytological sampling was 3.6%. There were no false negatives. CONCLUSION: Pipelle Mark II endometrial sampling is feasible. It provides adequate samples for histological and/or cytological analysis and reliable results. It reduces the rate of false negative results for endometrial cancer. Pipelle Mark II sampling is particularly useful in postmenopausal women and in women with endometrial atrophy. Other larger studies are necessary to evaluate the efficiency of Pipelle Mark II.