Influenza infection control practices in labor and delivery units during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the presence and usefulness of written policies and practices on infection control consistent with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) guidance in hospital labor and delivery (L&D) units during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Of 11,845 eligible nurses, 2,641 (22%) participated. This analysis includes a subset of 1,866 nurses who worked exclusively in L&D units. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive evaluation was sent to 12,612 members from the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN) who reported working in labor, delivery, postpartum, or newborn care settings during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. RESULTS: Respondents (73.8%) reported that CDC guidance was very useful for infection control in L&D settings during the pandemic. We assessed the presence of the following infection control written policies, consistent with CDC's guidance in hospital L&D units, during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic and their rate of implementation most of the time: questioning women upon arrival about recent flu-like symptoms (89.4%, 89.9%), immediate initiation of antiviral medicines if flu suspected or confirmed (65.2%, 49%), isolating ill women from healthy women immediately (90.7%, 84.7%), ask ill women to wear masks during L&D (67%, 57.7%), immediately separating healthy newborns from ill mothers (50.9%, 42.4%), and bathing healthy infants when stable (58.4%, 56.9%). Reported written policies for five of the six practices increased during the pandemic. Five of six written policies remained above baseline after the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents considered CDC guidance very useful. The presence of written policies is important for the implementation of infection control practices by L&D nurses.

Patterns of preconception, prenatal and postnatal care for diabetic women by obstetrician-gynecologists.

OBJECTIVE: To assess barriers to and quality of care received by diabetic pregnant women from obstetrician-gynecologists. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire was mailed to 1,000 representative practicing Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 74 did not treat pregnant patients and 510 (55.1%) returned completed surveys. Respondents were divided into 3 groups: maternal-fetal medicine specialists, physicians with high minority/low insurance patient populations, and physicians with low minority/ high insurance patient populations. RESULTS: Reported preconception and prenatal care was generally consistent with guidelines. Regarding gestational diabetes mellitus patients the 3 physician groups differed in assessing postpartum glycemic status, counseling about lifestyle changes, and counseling patients to consult a doctor before their next pregnancy. Patient demographics and perceived barriers to care were similar between maternal-fetal medicine specialists and physicians with high minority/low insurance patient populations. These two physician groups were more likely to agree that lack of educational materials, arranging specialist referrals, patient compliance with recommendations, and patients' ability to afford healthful food were barriers to quality care. CONCLUSION: According to physician self-report, pregnant diabetic patients with access to an obstetrician receive quality care regardless of insurance status. Postpartum care is more variable. Physicians with high minority/low insurance patient populations may lack access to resources.

Pregnant and recently pregnant women's perceptions about influenza a pandemic (H1N1) 2009: implications for public health and provider communication.

The objective of this study was to explore pregnant and recently pregnant women's perceptions of influenza vaccine and antivirals during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. We conducted 18 focus groups with pregnant and recently pregnant women in three US cities in September 2009. Participants were segmented into groups by insurance status (no or public insurance vs. private insurance), vaccine attitudes (higher vs. lower likelihood of acceptance of any vaccines, not only influenza vaccines), and parity (first child vs. other children in the home) based on information they provided on the screening questionnaire at the time of recruitment. We found that women are not well informed about influenza vaccinations and antiviral medicine and have significant concerns about taking them during pregnancy. An interest in their infant's well-being, however, can be strong motivation to adopt preventive recommendations, including vaccination. A woman's health care provider is a highly trusted source of information about the 2009 H1N1. Pregnant women have unique communication needs for influenza. Messages directing pregnant women to adopt public health recommendations, particularly for vaccination or prophylactic medication should include a detailed description of the benefits or lack of risk to the fetus and the safety of breastfeeding. Additionally, messages should recognize that pregnant women are taught to be selective about taking medication and provide a clear rationale for why the medicine or vaccine is necessary.

Prenatal care providers and influenza prevention and treatment: lessons from the field.

To better understand the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of providers regarding influenza infection and vaccination in pregnancy, fourteen focus groups were conducted among 92 providers in Atlanta, GA; Dallas, TX; and Portland, OR in late 2009. NVivo 8.0 was used for analysis. Most providers had no experience with pregnant women severely affected by influenza. Many perceived the 2009 H1N1 pandemic to be limited and mild. Providers knew that pregnant women should receive the 2009 H1N1 vaccine and reported plans to vaccinate more patients than the previous season. Most knew CDC guidelines for antiviral treatment and prophylaxis, but some reported hesitancy with presumptive treatment. Although awareness of influenza's potential to cause severe illness in pregnant women was observed, providers' experience and comfort with influenza prevention and treatment was suboptimal. Sustained efforts to educate prenatal care providers about influenza in pregnancy through trusted channels are critical.