Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Oncol ; 31(11): 1553-1560, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32801017

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase II/III trial aimed to evaluate an oral THC:CBD (tetrahydrocannabinol:cannabidiol) cannabis extract for prevention of refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Here we report the phase II component results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients experienced CINV during moderate-to-high emetogenic intravenous chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis. Study treatment consisted of one cycle of 1-4 self-titrated capsules of oral THC 2.5 mg/CBD 2.5 mg (TN-TC11M) three times daily, from days -1 to 5, and 1 cycle of matching placebo in a crossover design, then blinded patient preference for a third cycle. The primary end point was the proportion of participants with complete response during 0-120 h from chemotherapy. A total of 80 participants provided 80% power to detect a 20% absolute improvement with a two-sided P value of 0.1. RESULTS: A total of 81 participants were randomised; 72 completing two cycles were included in the efficacy analyses and 78 not withdrawing consent were included in safety analyses. Median age was 55 years (range 29-80 years); 78% were female. Complete response was improved with THC:CBD from 14% to 25% (relative risk 1.77, 90% confidence interval 1.12-2.79, P = 0.041), with similar effects on absence of emesis, use of rescue medications, absence of significant nausea, and summary scores for the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). Thirty-one percent experienced moderate or severe cannabinoid-related adverse events such as sedation, dizziness, or disorientation, but 83% of participants preferred cannabis to placebo. No serious adverse events were attributed to THC:CBD. CONCLUSION: The addition of oral THC:CBD to standard antiemetics was associated with less nausea and vomiting but additional side-effects. Most participants preferred THC:CBD to placebo. Based on these promising results, we plan to recruit an additional 170 participants to complete accrual for the definitive, phase III, parallel group analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001036404; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370473&isReview=true.


Asunto(s)
Antieméticos , Antineoplásicos , Cannabidiol , Cannabis , Náusea , Vómitos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Australia , Cannabidiol/uso terapéutico , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Dronabinol/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Náusea/tratamiento farmacológico , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA