Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 13(10): 964-70, 2002 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12435180

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to describe implantation techniques and lead performance for biventricular pacing, dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A dual-chamber ICD with biventricular pacing was implanted in 87 patients with congestive heart failure (ejection fraction: 0.21 +/- 0.09), prolonged QRS duration (161 +/- 22 msec), and an indication for ICD therapy. Left ventricular pacing was achieved with a thoracotomy approach (n = 21) or a nonthoracotomy approach (n = 66). With a thoracotomy, biventricular devices were implanted successfully in all patients. During follow-up (17 +/- 11 months), 9 patients died (43%), 2 underwent transplantation, and 2 required left ventricular lead revision. At last follow-up, biventricular sensing and capture threshold were 11 +/- 5 mV and 1.5 +/- 0.8 V, respectively. For nonthoracotomy procedures, two types of coronary sinus (CS) leads were implanted: an over-the-wire lead (n = 45) and a shaped lead (n = 21). The rate of successful implantation (overall: 89%) (over-the-wire 93% vs shaped 81%; P = 0.1) and durations for CS lead placement (66 +/- 50 vs 58 +/- 34 min, P = 0.6) and the procedure (133 +/- 58 vs 129 +/- 33 min, P = 0.8) were not different between the two CS leads. During follow-up (11 +/- 9 months), 9 patients died (14%), and the shaped CS lead dislodged in 3 patients (3 shaped vs 0 over-the-wire, P = 0.01). At last follow-up, biventricular sensing and capture threshold were 10 +/- 4 mV and 1.8 +/- 0.7 V, respectively, and there was no difference between over-the-wire and shaped leads. By multivariate analysis, mortality was associated with absence of spironolactone therapy but not procedural features. CONCLUSION: Nonthoracotomy CS lead implantation is feasible, with a success rate of about 90% and few adverse events. For the remaining 10%, a thoracotomy approach can be completed safely in these ill patients without increased risk for death.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Ventrículos Cardíacos/cirugía , Anciano , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Toracotomía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA