Transgender Medicine and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism.

Gender dysphoria refers to psychological distress that results from an incongruence between gender identity and sex assigned at birth. Administration of sex hormones is most often used as a first step to develop and maintain physical characteristics consistent with gender identity. Gender-affirming hormone treatment is considered beneficial for the quality of life and reduction of depression. However, estrogen and androgen-lowering hormone therapies used in transwomen are in particular associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism. In this review, introduced by a clinical case, we provide an overview of the currently available medical therapies in transgender medicine, and put the associated increased risk of venous thromboembolism into perspective.

A short review of ciraparantag in perspective of the currently available anticoagulant reversal agents.

Despite the improved safety-profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), bleeding complications remain an important side effect of anticoagulant treatment. Although anticoagulant-specific antidotes are available, an universal anticoagulant reversal agent in case of life-threatening bleeding or emergency surgery is not yet available. Ciraparantag, a synthetic small molecule that inactivates heparins and DOAC, is a promising new reversal agent that has been investigated in phase 2 trials. In this short review we provide an overview of the preclinical and clinical evidence of ciraparantag, and compare strengths and weaknesses of ciraparantag and the currently available anticoagulant reversal strategies.

Tranexamic acid to prevent operation in chronic subdural haematoma (TORCH): study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) occurs mainly in the elderly. Surgical evacuation is effective, but in these old, often frail, patients with multi-comorbidity, surgery carries significant risks for future cognitive functioning and loss of independency. Therefore, a growing interest is noted for a non-surgical treatment with medication such as tranexamic acid (TXA). In five small retrospective series, this antifibrinolytic drug showed a beneficial effect on the spontaneous resolution of the haematoma, and with that, the necessity for surgery. METHODS: For this randomised, placebo-controlled clinical multicentre trial, all cSDH patients, over 50 years old with mild symptoms (Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≥ 14, modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (mNIHSS) ≤ 4), a midline shift of ≤ 10 mm and in whom a primary conservative treatment is chosen, are eligible for study participation. After informed consent, 140 patients will be randomised to receive either TXA 500 mg or placebo two times daily for 28 days. The primary outcome is the necessity for surgery within 12 weeks; secondary outcomes are cSDH volume, neurological impairment (mNIHSS), falling incidents, cognitive functioning (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)), performance in activities of daily living (Barthel and Lawton score), functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)), quality of life (Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and EuroQol 5-Dimension Health Survey (EQ-5D)), mortality and the use of care and health-related costs (Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)) at 12 weeks and 6 months. DISCUSSION: This phase III trial investigating the efficacy of TXA to prevent surgery for cSDH is the first in including patients using anticoagulants and mentally incompetent patients, since these comprise a significant part of the target population. Also, this study is one of the first to prospectively measure functional outcome and quality of life in cSDH patients. Final results of this study are expected in 2024. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Registry (Nederlands Trial Register) NL6584 . Registered on 11 November 2017 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03582293 . Registered on 11 July 2018 EU Clinical Trials Register 2017-004311-40 . Registered on 29 March 2018.

Pregnancy outcomes in women with Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis - a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current practice and outcomes of pregnancy in women previously diagnosed with Budd-Chiari syndrome and/or portal vein thrombosis, with and without concomitant portal hypertension. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicentre retrospective cohort study between 2008 and 2021. POPULATION: Women who conceived in the predefined period after the diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome and/or portal vein thrombosis. METHODS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We collected data on diagnosis and clinical features. The primary outcomes were maternal mortality and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included maternal, neonatal and obstetric complications. RESULTS: Forty-five women (12 Budd-Chiari syndrome, 33 portal vein thrombosis; 76 pregnancies) were included. Underlying prothrombotic disorders were present in 23 of the 45 women (51%). Thirty-eight women (84%) received low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy. Of 45 first pregnancies, 11 (24%) ended in pregnancy loss and 34 (76%) resulted in live birth of which 27 were at term (79% of live births and 60% of pregnancies). No maternal deaths were observed; one woman developed pulmonary embolism during pregnancy and two women (4%) had variceal bleeding requiring intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The high number of term live births (79%) and lower than expected risk of pregnancy-related maternal and neonatal morbidity in our cohort suggest that Budd-Chiari syndrome and/or portal vein thrombosis should not be considered as an absolute contraindication for pregnancy. Individualised, nuanced counselling and a multidisciplinary pregnancy surveillance approach are essential in this patient population. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Budd-Chiari syndrome and/or portal vein thrombosis should not be considered as an absolute contraindication for pregnancy.

[Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia; extremely rare adverse event with major potential consequences]. / 'Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic trombocytopenia'.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is diagnosed if there is venous or arterial thrombosis with thrombocytopenia caused by antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) that activate thrombocytes and is confirmed by a heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test, occurring 4 to 28 days after vaccination against COVID19. This extremely rare syndrome has been recognized after Astra Zeneca (reporting incidence 0.91 per 100.000) and Janssen vaccins (0.22 per 100.000). Causality with the vaccine is difficult to ascertain if the HIPA test is negative, or if there is severe thrombosis (such as cerebral sinus or splanchnic thrombosis) without thrombocytopenia. Symptoms compatible with thrombosis or bleeding occurring in a specific time window after vaccination should prompt urgent assessment of the thrombocyte count and appropriate diagnostic tests. Heparin-like anticoagulants should be avoided and central laboratory assessment is essential. Early recognition likely improves prognosis of this extremely rare but severe complication of vaccination against COVID-19.

[Temporary suspension of AstraZeneca's vaccine; a reconstruction]. / Prikpauze AstraZeneca proportioneel?

In the middle of the worldwide COVID-19 crisis, the whole of Europe was alarmed about a possible side effect of the AstraZeneca vaccine against COVID-19. Consequently, the use of this AstraZeneca vaccine was temporarily suspended in many European nations including the Netherlands. In this article, we chronologically describe the decisions that were made about the use of this vaccine in the Netherlands and we discuss the risk-benefit ratios of these actions as well as possible non-medical reasons that may explain why these actions were taken.

Biomarkers for the prediction of venous thromboembolism in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is associated with mortality. Early diagnosis and treatment of VTE is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction model for VTE in critically ill COVID-19 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 127 adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection admitted to the intensive care unit of two teaching hospitals were included. VTE was diagnosed with either ultrasound or computed tomography scan. Univariate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for Positive End Expiratory Pressure, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, platelet count, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time as well as levels of fibrinogen, antithrombin, D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP). Multivariate analysis was done using binary linear regression. RESULTS: Variables associated with VTE in both univariate and multivariate analysis were D-dimer and CRP with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64, P = 0.023 and 0.75, P = 0.045, respectively. Variables indicating hypoxemia were not predictive. The ROC curve of D-dimer and CRP combined had an AUC of 0.83, P < 0.05. Categorized values of D-dimer and CRP were used to compute a mean absolute risk for the combination of these variables with a high positive predictive value. The predicted probability of VTE with a D-dimer > 15 in combination with a CRP > 280 was 98%. The negative predictive value of D-dimer was low. CONCLUSION: Elevated CRP and D-dimer have a high positive predictive value for VTE in critically ill COVID-19 patients. We developed a prediction table with these biomarkers that can aid clinicians in the timing of imaging in patients with suspected VTE.

Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In patients who undergo curative treatment for oesophageal cancer, risk estimates of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism and bleeding are needed to guide decisions about thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of patients with stage I-III oesophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy. The outcomes VTE, arterial thromboembolism, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and mortality were analysed for four consecutive cancer treatment stages (from diagnosis to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, during neoadjuvant treatment, 30-day postoperative period, and up to 6 months after postoperative period). RESULTS: Some 511 patients were included. The 2-year survival rate was 67·3 (95 per cent c.i. 63·2 to 71·7) per cent. During the 2-year follow-up, 50 patients (9·8 per cent) developed VTE, 20 (3·9 per cent) arterial thromboembolism, 21 (4·1 per cent) major bleeding and 30 (5·9 per cent) clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The risk of these events was substantial at all treatment stages. Despite 30-day postoperative thromboprophylaxis, 17 patients (3·3 per cent) developed VTE after surgery. Patients with VTE had worse survival (time-varying hazard ratio 1·81, 95 per cent c.i. 1·25 to 2·64). Most bleeding events occurred around the time of medical intervention, and approximately one-half during concomitant use of prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery are at substantial risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events throughout all stages of treatment. Survival is worse in patients with thromboembolic events during follow-up.

ANTECEDENTES: Para tomar decisiones en cuanto a la profilaxis tromboembólica, es preciso estimar el riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso (venous thromboembolism, VTE), de tromboembolismo arterial y de hemorragia en pacientes a los que se vaya a realizar un tratamiento curativo para el cáncer de esófago. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de un solo centro, de pacientes con cáncer de esófago en estadios I-III que fueron tratados con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante y esofagectomía. Se analizaron, en cuatro momentos del tratamiento (desde el momento del diagnóstico hasta la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante, durante el tratamiento neoadyuvante, en los 30 días del período postoperatorio y a los 6 meses de la cirugía) las siguientes variables: VTE, tromboembolismo arterial, hemorragia grave, hemorragia no grave clínicamente relevante y mortalidad. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 511 pacientes. La supervivencia a los 2 años fue del 67,3% (ic. del 95%, 63,2-71,7). Durante el seguimiento de 2 años, 50 pacientes desarrollaron un VTE (9,8%), 20 un tromboembolismo arterial (3,9%), 21 hemorragias graves (4,1%) y 30 hemorragias no graves clínicamente relevantes (5,9%). El riesgo de estos accidentes fue notable en todas las etapas del tratamiento. A pesar de la profilaxis tromboembólica posquirúrgica, a los 30 días, 17 pacientes (3,3%) desarrollaron un VTE después de la operación. Los pacientes con VTE tuvieron una supervivencia menor (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio en función del tiempo 1,81; i.c. del 95%, 1,25-2,64). La mayoría de los accidentes hemorrágicos ocurrieron en el contexto de una intervención médica y el 48% durante el uso concomitante de anticoagulación profiláctica o terapéutica. CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes con cáncer de esófago tratados con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante y cirugía tienen un riesgo sustancial de sufrir accidentes tromboembólicos y hemorrágicos en todas las fases del tratamiento. La supervivencia es peor en aquellos pacientes que presentan accidentes tromboembólicos durante el seguimiento.

Short-term prognosis of breakthrough venous thromboembolism in anticoagulated patients.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for guideline recommendations for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during anticoagulant therapy is scarce. We aimed to observe and to describe the management of VTE occurring during anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: This prospective multi-center, observational study included patients with objectively confirmed VTE during anticoagulant therapy (breakthrough event), with a follow-up of 3 months, after the breakthrough event. RESULTS: We registered 121 patients with a breakthrough event, with a mean age of 56 years (range, 19 to 90); 61 were male (50%). Fifty-eight patients (48%) had an active malignancy. At the time of the breakthrough event, 57 patients (47%) were treated with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), 53 patients (44%) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and 11 patients (9%) with direct oral anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin, or VKA plus LMWH. A total of 21 patients (17%) were receiving a subtherapeutic dose of an anticoagulant. The main regimens to treat recurrence in patients on VKA were: switch to LMWH (33%), temporary double treatment with LMWH and VKA (23%), and VKA with a higher target INR (19%). In patients with a breakthrough on LMWH, the most frequently chosen regimen was a permanent dose increase (74%). During 3-month follow-up, 7% of patients had a second breakthrough event and 8% experienced major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the management of VTE during anticoagulant treatment, reflecting a heterogeneous and complex clinical situation. Despite intensifying anticoagulation, the risk of a second breakthrough event in this population is 7%.

Platelet transfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is associated with poor clinical outcome.

Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) who are using antiplatelet drugs prior to their hemorrhage, often receive platelet transfusions to reverse antiplatelet effects prior to life-saving surgical interventions. However, little is known about the effect of platelet transfusion on patient outcome in these patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of platelet transfusion on clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal SAH (aSAH) who use antiplatelet agents. Consecutive adult patients with an aSAH admitted between 2011 and 2015 to the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) were included. Demographic characteristics and in-hospital complications were compared and clinical outcome was assessed after six months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to correct for confounding variables. A total of 364 patients with an aSAH were included. Thirty-eight (10%) patients underwent platelet transfusion during admission. Patients receiving platelet transfusion had worse clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 4-6) at six months compared to patients without platelet transfusion (65% versus 32%, odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval:1.9-8.1). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that platelet transfusion during admission was associated with unfavorable clinical outcome after six months; adjusted for age, treatment modality, modified Fisher and WFNS on admission (adjusted odds ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-8.4). In this observational study, platelet transfusion was associated with poor clinical outcome at six months after correcting for confounding influences. In aSAH patients who need surgical treatment at low risk of bleeding, the indication for platelet transfusion needs careful weighing of the risk-benefit-balance.

Edoxaban for treatment of venous thromboembolism in patient groups with different types of cancer: Results from the Hokusai VTE Cancer study.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of edoxaban and dalteparin is unclear for several cancer groups. METHODS: We evaluated the occurrence of the primary outcome in large cancer groups. The primary outcome was the composite of recurrent VTE or major bleeding over 12 months. RESULTS: In patients with gastrointestinal cancer, the primary outcome occurred in 19.4% patients given edoxaban and in 15.0% given dalteparin (risk difference [RD], 4.4%; 95%-CI, -4.1% to 12.8%). The corresponding rates for edoxaban and dalteparin were 10.4% and 10.7% for lung cancer (RD, -0.3%; 95%-CI, -10.0% to 9.5%), 13.6% and 12.5% for urogenital cancer (RD, 1.1; 95%-CI, -10.1-12.4), 3.1% and 11.7% for breast cancer (RD, -8.6; 95%-CI, -19.3-2.2), 8.9% and 10.9% for hematological malignancies (RD, -2.0; 95%-CI, -13.1-9.1), and 10.4% and 17.4% for gynecological cancer (RD, -7.0; 95%-CI, -19.8-5.7). In the subgroup of gastrointestinal cancer, edoxaban was associated with a 3.5% lower absolute risk of recurrent VTE and a 7.9% higher risk of major bleeding. CONCLUSION: Edoxaban has a similar risk-benefit ratio to dalteparin in most cancer groups. In those with gastrointestinal cancer, the lower risk of recurrent VTE and the advantages of oral therapy need to be balanced against the increased risk of major bleeding.

Diagnosing and treating antiphospholipid syndrome: a consensus paper.

INTRODUCTION: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by the occurrence of venous and/or arterial thrombosis and/or pregnancy-related morbidity, combined with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and/or a lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Large, controlled, intervention trials in APS are limited. This paper aims to provide clinicians with an expert consensus on the management of APS. METHODS: Relevant papers were identified by literature search. Statements on diagnostics and treatment were extracted. During two consensus meetings, statements were discussed, followed by a Delphi procedure. Subsequently, a final paper was written. RESULTS: Diagnosis of APS includes the combination of thrombotic events and presence of aPL. Risk stratification on an individual base remains challenging. 'Triple positive' patients have highest risk of recurrent thrombosis. aPL titres > 99th percentile should be considered positive. No gold standard exists for aPL testing; guidance on assay characteristics as formulated by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis should be followed. Treatment with vitamin K-antagonists (VKA) with INR 2.0-3.0 is first-line treatment for a first or recurrent APS-related venous thrombotic event. Patients with first arterial thrombosis should be treated with clopidogrel or VKA with target INR 2.0-3.0. Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants is not recommended. Patients with catastrophic APS, recurrent thrombotic events or recurrent pregnancy morbidity should be referred to an expert centre. CONCLUSION: This consensus paper fills the gap between evidence-based medicine and daily clinical practice for the care of APS patients.

Abnormal vaginal bleeding in women of reproductive age treated with edoxaban or warfarin for venous thromboembolism: a post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics and outcome of abnormal vaginal bleeding in women receiving edoxaban or warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). DESIGN AND SETTING: Post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study, a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial comparing edoxaban with warfarin for acute symptomatic VTE. POPULATION: Women below 50 years receiving edoxaban or warfarin for treatment of VTE. METHODS: We collected data on diagnostic measures, treatment, and clinical outcome of abnormal vaginal bleeding events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of major and clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) abnormal vaginal bleeding events. RESULTS: In all, 628 women aged under 50 years were treated with edoxaban and 665 with warfarin. The rate of abnormal vaginal bleeding was 15/100 person-years (py) (95% CI 11-19) in women receiving edoxaban and 9/100 py (95% CI 6-12) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5). Major abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred in eight (1.3%) women on edoxaban and in three (0.9%) women receiving warfarin [odds ratio (OR) 2.8; 95% CI 0.8-10.8], and CRNM abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred in 53 (8.4%) women treated with edoxaban and in 37 (5.6%) on warfarin therapy (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4). Over 85% of all vaginal bleeds were characterised by heavy menstrual bleeding. Major bleeds frequently required treatment, and in more than 75% of patients anticoagulant therapy was adjusted. The severity of clinical presentation and course of major and CRNM bleeds was mild in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred more frequently in women treated with edoxaban than with warfarin. Reassuringly, most events could be managed conservatively and had a mild outcome. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred more frequently in women treated with edoxaban than with warfarin.

Clinical and economic impact of compression in the acute phase of deep vein thrombosis.

Essentials The value of compression therapy in acute phase of deep vein thrombosis is still unclear. Patients with deep vein thrombosis received acute compression hosiery, bandaging, or none. Acute compression reduces irreversible skin signs related to post thrombotic syndrome. Compression hosiery may be the preferred choice for the acute phase SUMMARY: Background The effectiveness of compression therapy in the acute phase of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is not yet determined. Objectives To investigate the impact of compression therapy in the acute phase of DVT on determinants of the Villalta score, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and costs. Patients/Methods Eight hundred and sixty-five patients with proximal DVT (substudy of the IDEAL DVT study) received, immediately after DVT diagnosis, either no compression, multilayer bandaging, or hosiery. In the acute phase and 3 months after diagnosis, HRQOL was determined by use of the EQ-5D, SF6D, and VEINES-QoL intrinsic method (VEINES-QoLint ). At 3 months, signs and symptoms were assessed for the total and separate items of the Villalta score, and healthcare costs were calculated. Results The compression groups had lower overall objective Villalta scores than the no-compression group (1.47 [standard deviation (SD) 1.570] and 1.59 [SD 1.64] versus 2.21 [SD 2.15]). The differences were mainly attributable to irreversible skin signs (induration, hyperpigmentation, and venectasia) and pain on calf compression. Subjective and total Villalta scores were similar across groups. Differences in HRQOL were only observed at 1 month; HRQOL was better for hosiery (EQ-5D 0.86 [SD 0.18]; VEINES-QoLint  0.66 [SD 0.18]) than for multilayer compression bandaging (EQ-5D 0.81 [SD 0.23; VEINES-QoLint  0.62 [SD 0.19]). Mean healthcare costs per patient were €417.08 (€354.10 to €489.30) for bandaging, €114.25 (€92.50 to €198.43) for hosiery, and €105.86 (€34.63 to €199.30) for no compression. Conclusions Initial compression reduces irreversible skin signs, edema, and pain on calf compression. Multilayer bandaging is slightly more effective than hosiery, but has substantially higher costs, without a gain in HRQOL. From a patient and economic perspective, compression hosiery would be preferred when initial compression is applied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IDEAL DVT study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01429714.

Sex-specific performance of pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms for pulmonary embolism.

Essentials Decision rules for pulmonary embolism are used indiscriminately despite possible sex-differences. Various pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms have been investigated in several prospective studies. When analysed at an individual patient data level the algorithms perform similarly in both sexes. Estrogen use and male sex were associated with a higher prevalence in suspected pulmonary embolism. SUMMARY: Background In patients suspected of pulmonary embolism (PE), clinical decision rules are combined with D-dimer testing to rule out PE, avoiding the need for imaging in those at low risk. Despite sex differences in several aspects of the disease, including its diagnosis, these algorithms are used indiscriminately in women and men. Objectives To compare the performance, defined as efficiency and failure rate, of three pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms for PE between women and men: the Wells rule with fixed or with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off, and a recently validated algorithm (YEARS). A secondary aim was to determine the sex-specific prevalence of PE. Methods Individual patient data were obtained from six studies using the Wells rule (fixed D-dimer, n = 5; age adjusted, n = 1) and from one study using the YEARS algorithm. All studies prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with suspected PE. Main outcomes were efficiency (proportion of patients in which the algorithm ruled out PE without imaging) and failure rate (proportion of patients with PE not detected by the algorithm). Outcomes were estimated using (multilevel) logistic regression models. Results The main outcomes showed no sex differences in any of the separate algorithms. With all three, the prevalence of PE was lower in women (OR, 0.66, 0.68 and 0.74). In women, estrogen use, adjusted for age, was associated with lower efficiency and higher prevalence and D-dimer levels. Conclusions The investigated pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms for patients suspected of PE show no sex differences in performance. Male sex and estrogen use are both associated with a higher probability of having the disease.

Genes associated with venous thromboembolism in colorectal cancer patients.

Essentials The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms behind cancer-associated thrombosis are unknown. We compared expression profiles in tumor cells from patients with and without thrombosis. Tumors from patients with thrombosis showed significant differential gene expression profiles. Patients with thrombosis had a proinflammatory status and increased fibrin levels in the tumor. SUMMARY: Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in patients with cancer, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the mechanisms behind cancer-associated thrombosis are still incompletely understood. Objectives To identify novel genes that are associated with VTE in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Twelve CRC patients with VTE were age-matched and sex-matched to 12 CRC patients without VTE. Tumor cells were isolated from surgical samples with laser capture microdissection approaches, and mRNA profiles were measured with next-generation RNA sequencing. Results This approach led to the identification of new genes and pathways that might contribute to VTE in CRC patients. Application of ingenuity pathway analysis indicated significant links with inflammation, the methionine degradation pathway, and increased platelet function, which are all key processes in thrombus formation. Tumor samples of patients with VTE had a proinflammatory status and contained higher levels of fibrin and fibrin degradation products than samples of those without VTE. Conclusion This case-control study provides a proof-of-principle that tumor gene expression can discriminate between cancer patients with low and high risks of VTE. These findings may help to further unravel the pathogenesis of cancer-related VTE. The identified genes could potentially be used as candidate biomarkers to select high-risk CRC patients for thromboprophylaxis.

Cancer and risk of cerebral venous thrombosis: a case-control study.

Essentials The risk of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in patients with cancer is not known. We performed a case-control study including 594 patients with CVT and 6278 controls. History of cancer increased the risk of CVT approximately 5-fold. The association was strongest with hematological cancer in the first year after diagnosis. SUMMARY: Background Cancer is an established risk factor for leg vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Controlled studies assessing the risk of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in patients with cancer have not been performed. Objective To assess whether cancer is a risk factor for CVT. Patients/Methods This was a case-control study. We assessed consecutive adult patients with CVT from three academic hospitals from 1987 to 2015, and control subjects from the Dutch MEGA study (Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of risk factors for venous thrombosis). We adjusted for age, sex and oral contraceptive use, and stratified for type of cancer and time since diagnosis of cancer. Results We included 594 cases and 6278 controls. In total, 53 cases (8.9%) and 160 controls (2.5%) had a history of cancer. Cases were younger (median 42 vs. 48 years), more often female (68% vs. 54%) and more often used oral contraceptives (55% vs. 23%) than controls. The risk of CVT was increased in patients with cancer compared with those without cancer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.46-6.81). Patients with a hematological type of cancer had a higher risk of CVT (aOR, 25.14; 95% CI, 11.64-54.30) than those with a solid type of cancer (aOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 2.03-4.65). The association was strongest in the first year after diagnosis of cancer (hematological aOR, 85.57; 95% CI, 19.70-371.69; solid aOR, 10.50; 95% CI, 5.40-20.42). Conclusions Our study indicates that cancer is a strong risk factor for CVT, particularly within the first year of diagnosis and in patients with a hematological type of cancer.