Rescue Allocation Modes in Eurotransplant Kidney Transplantation: Recipient Oriented Extended Allocation Versus Competitive Rescue Allocation-A Retrospective Multicenter Outcome Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whenever the kidney standard allocation (SA) algorithms according to the Eurotransplant (ET) Kidney Allocation System or the Eurotransplant Senior Program fail, rescue allocation (RA) is initiated. There are 2 procedurally different modes of RA: recipient oriented extended allocation (REAL) and competitive rescue allocation (CRA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of patient survival and graft failure with RA mode and whether or not it varied across the different ET countries. METHODS: The ET database was retrospectively analyzed for donor and recipient clinical and demographic characteristics in association with graft outcomes of deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) across all ET countries and centers from 2014 to 2021 using Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS: Seventeen thousand six hundred seventy-nine renal transplantations were included (SA 15 658 [89%], REAL 860 [4.9%], and CRA 1161 [6.6%]). In CRA, donors were older, cold ischemia times were longer, and HLA matches were worse in comparison with REAL and especially SA. Multivariable analyses showed comparable graft and recipient survival between SA and REAL; however, CRA was associated with shorter graft survival. Germany performed 76% of all DDRTs after REAL and CRA and the latter mode reduced waiting times by up to 2.9 y. CONCLUSIONS: REAL and CRA are used differently in the ET countries according to national donor rates. Both RA schemes optimize graft utilization, lead to acceptable outcomes, and help to stabilize national DDRT programs, especially in Germany.

Outcomes of kidney transplantations in children weighing 15 kilograms or less: a retrospective cohort study.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is often delayed in small children because of fear of postoperative complications. We report early- and long-term outcomes in children transplanted at ≤15 kg in the two largest Belgian pediatric transplant centers. Outcomes before (period 1) and since the introduction of basiliximab and mycophenolate-mofetil in 2000 (period 2) were compared. Seventy-two KTs were realized between 1978 and 2016: 38 in period 1 and 34 in period 2. Organs came from deceased donors in 48 (67%) cases. Surgical complications occurred in 25 KTs (35%) with no significant difference between the two periods. At least one acute rejection (AR) occurred in 24 (33%) KTs with significantly less patients experiencing AR during period 2: 53% and 12% in period 1 and, period 2 respectively (P < 0.001). Graft survival free of AR improved significantly in period 2 compared with period 1: 97% vs. 50% at 1 year; 87% vs. 50% at 10 years post-KT (P = 0.003). Graft survival tended to increase over time (period 1: 74% and 63% at 1 and 5 years; period 2: 94% and 86% at 1 and 5 years; P = 0.07), as well as patient survival. Kidney transplantation in children ≤15 kg remains a challenging procedure with 35% of surgical complications. However, outcomes improved and are nowadays excellent in terms of prevention of AR, patient and graft survival.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium by limited sampling strategies is associated with a high rate of failure.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid (MPA) is usually performed with a limited sampling strategy (LSS), which relies on a limited number of blood samples and subsequent extrapolation of the global exposure to MPA. LSS is usually performed successfully with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), but data on enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) are scarce. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of 6-h LSS therapeutic drug monitoring with EC-MPS compared with MMF monitoring among kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Sixty-two patients who received EC-MPS during the first 6 months of transplantation were compared with a matched group of 64 MMF-treated kidney transplant recipients. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed by LSS using multiple concentration time points (0, 1, 2, 3 and 6 h post-dose) and a trapezoidal rule. Patients had MPA therapeutic drug monitoring performed on two occasions, one within 2 weeks and the second after 3-4 months of transplantation. RESULTS: EC-MPS monitoring and MMF therapeutic drug monitoring were not interpretable in 34.5% (n = 40/116) and 1.8% (n = 2/112) of patients, respectively {relative risk [RR] 19.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8-78.0]; P < 0.0001}. The main cause of abnormal EC-MPS therapeutic drug monitoring was delayed absorption of both the previous evening and the morning dose, resulting in MPA plasma levels before the next morning dose being higher than MPA plasma levels measured at 1, 2 and 3 h after taking EC-MPS. Cyclosporin in association with MMF significantly increased the risk of low AUC values (<30 mg h/L) in comparison with tacrolimus [55% (n = 11/20) and 10% (n = 9/88), respectively; RR 5.4 (95% CI 2.6-11.2); P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of therapeutic drug monitoring failure with EC-MPS is >30% during the first 6 months of renal transplantation. Delayed pharmacokinetics was the main reason. In contrast, the risk of therapeutic drug monitoring failure was substantially lower with MMF.

Does basiliximab induction trigger lifethreatening ARDS and shock in young patients after kidney transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Kidney disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines strongly recommend administering an anti-IL-2R mAb (i.e., basiliximab) for induction in all kidney transplant recipients. We describe a life-threatening episode of shock following basiliximab injection and review the literature. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 20-year-old male was given tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, mycophenolate, and basiliximab, 20 mg in the context of living-related kidney transplantation. On post-operative Day 1 (POD 1), he developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), shock, multiple organ failure, and had a cardiac arrest. After effective resuscitation, he received rescue therapies (NO inhalation, extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, and CVVHD) but lost the graft as the result of cortical necrosis. We conducted PubMed searches that yielded 7 similar cases; 6 required invasive ventilation. Three patients developed cardiac arrest, 3 required major inotropic support, and 2 developed MOF and myocardial depression. All but 1 patient recovered rapidly within a few days. There was no evidence for infectious, allergic, or over-hydration concerns. Although the direct causal role of basiliximab cannot be formally proven, the fact that ARDS at the time of induction therapy with other immunosuppressive agents is otherwise extremely rare suggests a direct role for basiliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab could be associated with shock and ARDS.

Ticlopidine and clopidogrel, sometimes combined with aspirin, only minimally increase the surgical risk in renal transplantation: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing kidney transplantation are sometimes being treated with antiplatelet agents such as ticlopidine or clopidogrel. Some teams refuse to wait-list these patients for fear of bleeding during transplant surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 702 adult patients with a kidney transplant alone between 2000 and 2010. Nineteen (2.7%) patients were taking clopidogrel or ticlopidine when called in for transplantation. Furthermore, 10 of these 19 patients were also taking low-dose aspirin (ASA). We compared the risk of bleeding peri- and postoperatively, and the occurrence of cardiovascular complications within 30 days after renal transplantation between 19 cases and 39 controls randomly selected within the cohort. RESULTS: Platelets were administered to 7 cases (37%) versus 0 controls (P<0.001). A single case (5.3%) presented with significant bleeding during surgery following an implantation biopsy, and required 4 red bood cell (RBC) units. During the first day, 3 of the 19 cases (16%) and 1 of the 39 controls required RBC (P=0.1). No reoperation was performed for bleeding. After the transplant, clopidogrel or ticlopidine was resumed in only two patients. The platelet count and haemoglobin were similar between cases and controls at Day 30. No cardiovascular event occurred in cases or controls during the first month post-transplantation. At 5 years, graft and patient survival was similar in cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel and ticlopidine, sometimes in combination with ASA, are associated with a low risk of bleeding during renal transplantation and does not seem to be a contraindication for renal transplant surgery.

Shipping donor kidneys within Eurotransplant: outcomes after renal transplantation in a single-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Shipment of organs during the allocation process aims to improve human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matching but can also have a detrimental effect by prolonging cold ischaemia. The overall effect of organ exchange on post-transplant outcomes in the Eurotransplant (ET) region has not been investigated. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre cohort study to investigate the effect of shipment of renal allografts on cold ischaemia times and the incidence of acute rejection (AR) and graft survival in 661 transplantations of deceased donor kidneys. RESULTS: Forty-six per cent (N = 301) of the patients received a locally procured and 54% (N = 360) a shipped donor kidney. Locally procured donors tended to be older, more often hypertensive and had less frequently died from trauma. Recipients of shipped kidneys were at higher immunological risk, being younger, more frequently retransplanted and immunized against HLA antigens. Shipped kidneys had a 2.2-h prolongation of cold ischaemia time (18.0 versus 20.2 h; P < 0.0001) but significantly less HLA A, B and DR mismatches (2.20 versus 2.84; P < 0.0001). Recipients of shipped kidneys had an increased incidence of first-year AR [19 versus 13%; odds ratio 1.62 (1.06-2.49); P = 0.026] and death-censored graft loss [hazard ratio 1.6 (1.1-2.4); P = 0.01] that was no longer statistically significant after adjustments for risk factors by multivariable modelling. CONCLUSIONS: Shipment of kidneys in the ET region is associated with a modest increase in cold ischaemia time and significantly better HLA matching. This allows for successful transplantation of higher risk patients with no significant penalty with regard to AR rates or death-censored graft survival.

Ineligibility for renal transplantation: prevalence, causes and survival in a consecutive cohort of 445 patients.

Little is known about the proportion of renal transplant candidates who are considered ineligible by the transplant center, the reasons of their ineligibility and their survival during dialysis. In this retrospective, single-center study of 445 adult patients referred between 2001 and 2006, 36 (8%) were deemed ineligible for medical contraindications. The leading reason was cardiovascular (CV) (75%), specifically aorto-iliac, and/or limb vessels atheromatosis or calcifications; ischemic heart disease; or a combination thereof. Nine patients had other contraindications that were absolute for three of them; six patients displayed a combination of relative contraindications. When compared to eligible patients (N = 409), those ineligible were significantly older (60 yr vs. 48), more often diabetics (50% vs. 15%), obese (39% vs. 17%) suffering from coronary artery disease (53% vs. 11%) and peripheral arterial disease (86% vs. 11%). Their primary nephropathy was more often diabetic and/or hypertensive/nephroangiosclerosis (61% vs. 23%), and their median dialysis vintage prior to evaluation was longer (29 months vs. 10, p < 0.0001). The actuarial survival of ineligible patients was significantly lower than that of eligible patients (at five yr: 53% vs. 88%). Adequate control of CV risk factors before dialysis and early referral for transplantation might help to improve eligibility of renal transplant candidates.

Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf among kidney transplant recipients results in sustained decrease in tacrolimus exposure.

BACKGROUND: Advagraf is a slow release form of tacrolimus with once-daily formulation. The potential advantages of Advagraf are better adherence and a safer profile by avoiding toxic peak concentrations. In this study, we evaluated the required daily doses of tacrolimus and subsequent blood levels on conversion from Prograf to Advagraf among kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 55 patients for whom a switch from Prograf to Advagraf was identified. Tacrolimus daily doses and concomitant blood levels were analyzed at several time points ranging from 3 months before to 6 months after conversion. RESULTS: We observed a significant increase in tacrolimus daily doses, starting with a dose of 0.063 mg/kg of Prograf, increasing up to 0.081 mg/kg of Advagraf at 6 months (P<0.0001). After conversion, we observed a quick and sustained decrease in trough tacrolimus levels, decreasing from 8.05 ng/mL at day 0 to 6.30 ng/mL at day 180 (P=0.0009). At 6 months, 35% of patients experienced a decrease in trough levels of more than 30%. Creatinine values remained stable over time, and no patient experienced an acute rejection episode. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the manufacturer instructions, we found a significant decrease in tacrolimus exposure after switching to Advagraf. Therefore, the switch from Prograf to Advagraf should be performed under close medical supervision.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Recipient Nephrectomy and Recipient Kidney Procurement during Orthotopic Living-Related Kidney Transplantation.

Advanced atherosclerosis or thrombosis of iliac vessels can constitute an absolute contraindication for heterotopic kidney transplantation. We report the case of a 42-year-old women with end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis and a history of bilateral thrombosis of iliac arteries caused by antiphospholipid antibodies. Occlusion had been treated by the bilateral placement of wall stents which precluded vascular anastomosis. The patient was transplanted with a right kidney procured by laparoscopic nephrectomy from her HLA semi-identical sister. The recipient had left nephrectomy after laparoscopical transperitoneal dissection. The donor kidney was orthotopically transplanted with end-to-end anastomosis of graft vessels to native renal vessels and of the graft and native ureter. Although, the patient received full anticoagulation because of a cardiac valve and antiphospholipid antibodies, she had no postoperative complication in spite of a short period of delayed graft function. Serum creatinine levels three months after transplantation were at 1.0 mg/dl. Our case documents that orthotopical transplantation of laparoscopically procured living donor kidneys at the site of recipient nephrectomy is a feasible procedure in patients with surgical contraindication of standard heterotopic kidney transplantation.

Cold ischemia is a major determinant of acute rejection and renal graft survival in the modern era of immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to examine, in a recent cohort of kidney transplant recipients who have received modern immunosuppressive therapy, the respective role of cold ischemia time (CIT) and delayed graft function (DGF) on acute rejection (AR) rates and long-term graft survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 611 renal transplantations between 1996 and 2005. Most patients received a calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance therapy, either cyclosporine (43%) or tacrolimus (52%) and 76% of the patients received an antilymphocyte induction therapy. Study endpoints were DGF, first-year AR, and long-term graft survival. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors that may have influenced the study outcomes. RESULTS: DGF was observed in 16.2% of patients. Both older donor age and longer CIT were significant risk factors for DGF. DGF rates were similar whether patients received a calcineurin inhibitor before transplantation or not. AR occurred in 16.5% of grafts during the first year. Independent predictors of AR by multivariate analysis were duration of dialysis, CIT, current panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5%, and the number of human leukocyte antigen-A, B, and DR mismatches. Each hour of cold ischemia increases the risk of rejection by 4%. With respect to death-censored graft survival, three pretransplant parameters emerged as independent predictors of graft loss: younger recipient age, peak panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5% and longer CIT. The detrimental effect of CIT on graft survival was entirely because of its propensity to trigger AR. When AR was added to the multivariate Cox model, CIT was no longer significant whereas first-year AR became the most important predictor of graft loss (Hazards ratio, 4.6). CONCLUSION: Shortening CIT will help to decrease not only DGF rates but also AR incidence and hence graft loss. Patients with prolonged CIT should receive adequate immunosuppression, possibly with antilymphocyte preparations, to prevent AR occurrence.

HLA mismatches remain risk factors for acute kidney allograft rejection in patients receiving quadruple immunosuppression with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies.

BACKGROUND: New immunosuppressive drugs such as anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (aIL2R) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have reduced the incidence of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Whether matching donor and recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens is still relevant in patients receiving modern immunosuppression has been questioned. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence and risk factors of acute rejection during the first posttransplant year and the impact of acute rejection on long-term graft survival in a cohort of 208 renal transplant patients treated with aIL2R (basiliximab, n=166; daclizumab, n=42), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, n=180; cyclosporin, n=28), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Graft and patient survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for acute rejection were analyzed by logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated for acute rejection (26 biopsy-proven) during the first posttransplant year. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of first-year acute rejection was 13.2%. The number of HLA mismatches (odds ratio [OR] 1.65 per HLA mismatch) and long periods of dialysis before transplantation (OR 3.1 for more than 4 years of dialysis) were the only independent risk factors for first-year acute rejection. First-year acute rejection was associated with a significant reduction in overall and death-censored graft survival at 5 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequent in patients receiving modern immunosuppressive drugs, acute rejection remains an important risk factor for graft loss after renal transplantation. Our results suggest that better HLA matching and shorter periods of dialysis before transplantation could reduce acute rejection rates and further improve outcomes under current immunosuppressive regimens.