Drug monitoring detects under- and overdosing in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil-containing chemotherapy-results of a prospective, multicenter German observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Body surface area (BSA)-based dosing of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) results in marked inter-individual variability in drug levels, whereas determination of plasma 5-FU concentration and area under the curve (AUC) is a more precise dosing method but has not been integrated into clinical routine. We conducted a multicenter, prospective study to study 5-FU AUC distributions and assess clinical factors predicting therapeutic dosing in patients receiving BSA-dosed 5-FU. METHODS: Between June 2017 and January 2018, a total of 434 patients receiving continuous, infusional BSA-dosed 5-FU from 37 sites in Germany were included. Plasma 5-FU concentration and AUC were measured in venous blood samples at steady state. The primary objective was to determine 5-FU AUC distributions in relation to the target range, which is defined as 20-30 mg × h/l. The second objective was to explore clinical parameters that correlate with achievement of 5-FU AUC target range. RESULTS: The primary tumor was mainly located in the gastrointestinal tract (96.3%), with colorectal cancer being the most common (71.2%) tumor entity. 5-FU was administered as monotherapy (8.1%) or as part of FOLFOX (33.2%), FOLFIRI (26.3%), or other regimens (12.4%). Treatment setting was adjuvant (31.3%) or metastatic (64.5%). The median AUC was 16 mg × h/l. Only 20.3% of patients received 5-FU treatment within the target range, whereas the majority of patients (60.6%) were underdosed and 19.1% of patients were overdosed. In the univariate logistic regression, treatment setting was the only clinical parameter that significantly correlated with achievement of the target range. Patients treated in the metastatic setting had a 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.186-3.776, P = 0.011) higher odds to reach the target range compared with patients treated in the adjuvant setting. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients received suboptimal doses of 5-FU using BSA dosing. Therapeutic drug monitoring of 5-FU is an option for optimized individualized cancer therapy and should be integrated into the clinical practice.

Immunoluminometric assay for copeptin measurement in cerebrospinal fluid: Technical aspects and pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Copeptin acts as surrogate marker under stress stimuli, as well as an outcome predictor based on serum or plasma concentration in patients suffering intracranial hemorrhage, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), and stroke. The aim of this study was to establish a method for quantification of copeptin levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and to demonstrate its clinical applicability in patients following aSAH. METHODS: This assay was validated for CSF samples using a commercial immunoluminometric assay (IMLA). For the control group (10 patients), CSF copeptin levels were determined in patients without signs of acute neurological diseases and who underwent a diagnostic lumbar puncture. The pilot cohort included calculation of copeptin levels in CSF and in serum of patients following aSAH. RESULTS: The control group had CSF copeptin levels lower than 0.78 pmol/L-1. Among patients with aSAH, CSF copeptin values had a mean of 20.1 pmol/L-1 and serum copeptin concentrations had a mean of 61.39 pmol/L-1. CONCLUSIONS: This assay provides to best of our knowledge for the first time initial ranges values of CSF copeptin for patients without acute neurological disease and in patients with aSAH. Thus, it opens new doors to develop further calculations and relationships between diseases biomarker and outcome prediction.

A randomised, placebo- and active-controlled dose-finding study of aclidinium bromide administered twice a day in COPD patients.

This Phase IIb, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled crossover study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01120093) assessed efficacy and safety of three doses of aclidinium bromide in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients were randomised to one of five treatment sequences each consisting of twice-daily (BID) aclidinium 100 µg, 200 µg, 400 µg (via Genuair®*), formoterol 12 µg (via Aerolizer®) and matched placebo for 7 days, with a 5- to 9-day washout period. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) normalised area under the curve (AUC)0-12 on Day 7. Secondary endpoints were: change from baseline in FEV1 normalised AUC12-24, FEV1 normalised AUC0-24 and morning pre-dose FEV1 on Day 7. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Of 79 randomised patients, 68 (86.1%) completed the study. After 7 days of treatment, aclidinium and formoterol produced statistically significantly greater changes from baseline in FEV1 normalised AUC0-12 vs placebo (p<0.0001). FEV1 normalised AUC12-24, FEV1 normalised AUC0-24, and morning pre-dose FEV1 were also statistically significantly greater with all aclidinium doses vs placebo (p<0.0001). Improvements in primary and secondary endpoints were statistically significantly greater with aclidinium 400 µg vs 100 µg. The safety profile of aclidinium was comparable to placebo. These results demonstrated that twice-daily aclidinium produced dose-dependent clinically meaningful improvements in FEV1 compared with placebo. This study also confirmed the use of an aclidinium BID dosing regimen and established aclidinium 200 µg and 400 µg as suitable doses for further investigation in Phase III trials.