Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 843, 2024 Jul 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39054510

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the intra and postoperative complications of frenectomy procedure with a surgical scalpel versus 445 nm and 980 nm diode lasers. METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 174 patients requiring maxillary labial frenectomy. After completion of fixed orthodontic treatment and primary closure of maxillary diastema, the patients were randomly assigned into three groups (n = 58): group 1 (frenectomy via 445 nm diode laser, continuous-wave, 1.5 W), group 2 (frenectomy via 980 nm laser, continuous-wave, 1.7 W), and control group (V-Y plasty technique via scalpel). Intra-operative bleeding, discomfort in chewing and speaking, pain, and tissue healing were compared among the groups immediately, at 7 and 30 days postoperatively using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2 (immediately and day 7, P < 0.05). Significant faster tissue healing at days 7 and 30 were observed in group 1 compared to group 2 (P < 0.05). Group 1 was superior to the control group regarding lower intraoperative bleeding, discomfort in chewing and speaking (immediately and day 7), lower pain (immediately and day 7), and tissue healing (day 7) (P < 0.05 for all). Group 2 was significantly superior to the control group in lower intraoperative bleeding, discomfort in chewing and speaking (immediately and day 7), and better tissue healing (day 7) (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, diode laser frenectomy resulted in significantly lower intra and postoperative complications compared to the scalpel. Moreover, 445 nm diode laser showed significantly superior effects compared to 980 nm diode laser. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on 29.10.2022 at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( www.irct.ir ) (registration number: IRCT20220630055326N1).


Asunto(s)
Frenillo Labial , Láseres de Semiconductores , Humanos , Láseres de Semiconductores/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Frenillo Labial/cirugía , Adulto , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Maxilar/cirugía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Cicatrización de Heridas , Dimensión del Dolor , Frenectomía Oral
2.
Clin Case Rep ; 9(8): e04632, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34401174

RESUMEN

Offering the whole orthodontic and surgical treatment to the patient as a single package in a one office can save them considerable time and the trouble. Diode laser enables orthodontists to do so while enjoying its benefits over the scalpel.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA