[Acute life-threatening drug reactions of the skin]. / Akute, lebensbedrohliche Medikamentenreaktionen der Haut.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are acutely occurring, unpredictable, often life-threatening reactions that are a huge challenge in clinical practice. They are characterized by extensive blistering of skin and mucosa and are considered as one disease entity of different severity. Thus, they are summarized as SJS/TEN or EN (for epidermal or epithelial necrolysis). The diagnosis can be confirmed through synopsis of clinical pattern and histopathological findings. To identify the inducing factors, it is crucial to obtain a detailed and thorough medication and infection history. Based on the results of large epidemiological studies, potentially inducing drugs can be narrowed down even in cases of multimedication and underlying diseases. Agents with a high risk for SJS/TEN are allopurinol, antibacterial sulfonamides, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs of the oxicam-type, various antiepileptics and nevirapine. They alone explain more than half of the cases of SJS/TEN. Typically, the reaction occurs during the first continuous use of the medication, while the beginning of use most often is one to four weeks prior to reaction onset. However, a drug is not always the cause of the reaction, but in approximately 70-75% of the cases very likely. In other cases infections may be potential causes. If certain medications are thought to be the inducing factors, they should be withdrawn without delay. In addition, symptomatic treatment should be initiated. In case of progression, an additional immunomodulating therapy should be considered. In this respect, systematic reviews have shown best results for cyclosporine A and systemic steroids.

[Severe skin reactions due to new medications]. / Schwere Hautreaktionen auf neue Medikamente.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and a specific form of hypersensitivity syndrome which is nowadays called "drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms" (DRESS) are severe, mainly drug-induced skin reactions. Whereas SJS/TEN is considered one reaction entity of different severity, DRESS has to be distinguished from SJS/TEN but also from other severe exanthems due to multiorgan involvement. Although SJS/TEN is generally referred to as drug reaction, in total only about three quarters of the cases are actually caused by drugs. After the clinical diagnosis is made, identification of the potential inducing factor is most important. In case medications are considered as causal, their withdrawal plays a key role in management. In order to identify and withdraw the inducing agent, a detailed and thorough medication history must be obtained. Agents identified or confirmed as inducers of SJS/TEN by pharmacoepidemiological studies are allopurinol, antibacterial sulfonamides, various antiepileptics, nevirapine and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs of the oxicam-type. Among drugs inducing DRESS are also various antiepileptics, but in addition allopurinol, sulfonamides and minocycline. Some cases of SJS/TEN and DRESS associated with the use of new medication, including targeted therapies and biologicals, have been observed.

[Severe cutaneous drug reactions in children]. / Schwere kutane Arzneimittelreaktionen im Kindesalter.

Among severe drug reactions in children, besides Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), a specific form of hypersensitivity syndrome which is nowadays known as "drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms" (DRESS) has to be mentioned. Whereas SJS/TEN is considered one reaction entity of different severity, DRESS has to be distinguished from SJS/TEN but also from other severe exanthems due to multiorgan involvement. Although SJS/TEN is generally referred to as a drug reaction, only about 75% of all cases are actually caused by medications and in children it is only about 50%. After a clear diagnosis has been made, specific therapeutic measures can follow, of which withdrawal of the inducing agent plays a key role, but further treatments differ substantially. In order to identify and withdraw the inducing agent, a detailed and thorough medication history must be obtained. Highly suspected drugs of SJS/TEN in children include, among others, antibacterial sulfonamides and various antiepileptics. DRESS in children and adolescents is also frequently induced by antiepileptics, but also by sulfonamides and minocycline. In contrast to adults, allopurinol is rarely found to be culprit in both conditions. Supportive therapy including appropriate topical treatments, pain therapy, ophthalmologic consultations, etc. is the gold standard in SJS/TEN, but a short-term immunomodulating therapy with cyclosporine A has shown very promising results in recent studies. In DRESS, however, systemic treatment with glucocorticosteroids slowly tapered over a longer period of time is recommended.

Epidemiology of cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

Epidemiologic investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) is important in order to evaluate their impact on dermatology and health care in general as well as their burden on affected patients. Few epidemiologic studies have been performed on frequent non-life-threatening cADR, including reactions of both delayed and immediate hypersensitivity, such as maculopapular exanthema (MPE), fixed drug eruption, and urticaria. Concerning rare but life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions, e.g., toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), several epidemiologic studies have been performed to date, some of which are still ongoing. Such studies enable the calculation of reliable incidence rates and demographic data, and also allow researchers to perform risk estimation for drugs. The spectrum of drugs causing cADR differs substantially when separating the various clinical conditions. Whereas antibiotics are by far the most frequent inducers of milder cADRs, like MPE, they have a much lower risk of inducing SJS/TEN, for which "high-risk" drugs are anti-infective sulfonamides, allopurinol, certain anti-epileptic drugs, nevirapine, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) of the oxicam-type. In contrast, AGEP is predominantly caused by the antibiotics pristinamycin and aminopenicillins, followed by quinolones, (hydroxy-)chloroquine, and sulfonamides. DRESS can be induced by a number of drugs known to cause SJS/TEN, such as certain antiepileptics and allopurinol, but also other medications (e.g., minocyclin).

[Unintended rechallenge : Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption in two elderly women]. / Unfreiwillige Reexposition : Generalisiertes bullöses fixes Arzneiexanthem bei 2 älteren Patientinnen.

Severe bullous skin reactions like Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE) are rare, but occasionally fatal diseases which are mainly induced by drugs. We report about 2 women who both developed severe bullous skin reactions after domestic falls. Despite knowing the causative drug and having an allergy identification, both patients suffered from a secondary event after unintentional re-exposure.

[Severe drug-induced skin reactions. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis]. / Schwere arzneimittelinduzierte Hautreaktionen. Stevens-Johnson-Syndrom und toxisch epidermale Nekrolyse.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are characterized by extensive blistering of the skin and mucosa; they are considered as one disease entity with varying severity. They are rare but potentially life-threatening and accompanied by high mortality. A clear clinical diagnosis is needed to direct specific therapy, but supportive therapy remains most important. In order to identify and withdraw the inducing drug, a very detailed and thorough medication history has to be obtained. Among the highly suspected (strongly associated) agents are allopurinol, antibacterial sulfonamides, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs of the oxicam type, various anti-epileptics and nevaripine. Together they account for more than half of the cases of SJS/TEN. Although a drug is not always the cause, it is considered very like in approximately 75% of cases. Infections have also to be considered as etiologic factors.

HLA-A*31:01 and different types of carbamazepine-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions: an international study and meta-analysis.

HLA-A*31:01 was reported to be associated with carbamazepine (CBZ)-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), including drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). We conducted an international study using consensus diagnosis criteria to enroll a total of 93 patients with CBZ-SCAR from Europe or Asia. We found that HLA-A*31:01 showed a significant association with CBZ-DRESS in Europeans (P<0.001; odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI))=57.6 (11.0-340)), and the strong association was also found in Chinese (P<0.001; OR (95% CI)=23.0 (4.2-125)). However, HLA-A*31:01 had no association with CBZ-SJS/TEN in neither Chinese nor Europeans. By comparison, HLA-B*15:02 showed a strong association with CBZ-SJS/TEN in Chinese (P<0.001, OR (95% CI)=58.1 (17.6-192)). A meta-analysis of this and other published studies confirmed that in all populations, HLA-A*31:01 had an extremely strong association with CBZ-DRESS (P<0.001, a pooled OR (95% CI)=13.2 (8.4-20.8)), but a much weaker association with CBZ-SJS/TEN (P=0.01, OR (95% CI)=3.94 (1.4-11.5)). Our data revealed that HLA-A*31:01 is a specific predictor for CBZ-DRESS but not for CBZ-SJS/TEN. More studies are needed to investigate the genetic determinant of CBZ-SJS/TEN in Europeans. Considering the potential clinical utility, the cost-effectiveness of the combined HLA-A*31:01 and HLA-B*15:02 genetic test to prevent CBZ-SCAR in Chinese needs further investigation.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): an original multisystem adverse drug reaction. Results from the prospective RegiSCAR study.

BACKGROUND: Cases of severe drug hypersensitivity, demonstrating a variable spectrum of cutaneous and systemic involvement, are reported under various names, especially drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Case definition and overlap with other severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) are debated. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the spectrum of signs and symptoms of DRESS and distribution of causative drugs in a large multicentre series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RegiSCAR, a multinational registry of SCAR, prospectively enrolled 201 potential cases from 2003 to mid-2009. Using a standardized scoring system, 117 cases were validated as showing probable or definite DRESS. RESULTS: The male/female ratio was 0.80; females were borderline significantly younger than males. Next to the ubiquitous exanthema, the main features were eosinophilia (95%), visceral involvement (91%), high fever (90%), atypical lymphocytes (67%), mild mucosal involvement (56%) and lymphadenopathy (54%). The reaction was protracted in all but two patients; two patients died during the acute phase. Drug causality was plausible in 88% of cases. Antiepileptic drugs were involved in 35%, allopurinol in 18%, antimicrobial sulfonamides and dapsone in 12% and other antibiotics in 11%. The median time interval after drug intake was 22 days (interquartile range 17-31) for all drugs with (very) probable causality, with differences between drugs. CONCLUSION: This prospective observational study supports the hypothesis that DRESS is an original phenotype among SCAR in terms of clinical and biological characteristics, causative drugs, and time relation. The diversity of causative drugs was rather limited, and mortality was lower than that suggested by prior publications.

Prognosis of generalized bullous fixed drug eruption: comparison with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

BACKGROUND: Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE) is a rare cutaneous adverse reaction to drugs, and may resemble Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), but is usually considered less severe. OBJECTIVES: To compare the severity and mortality rate in cases of GBFDE and control cases of SJS or TEN of similar extent of skin detachment. METHODS: This was a case-control analysis of 58 patients with GBFDE matched by age and extent of skin detachment to 170 control patients with a validated diagnosis of SJS or SJS/TEN overlap. Data for cases and controls were extracted from the EuroSCAR and RegiSCAR databases resulting from two population-based studies of severe cutaneous adverse reactions conducted in Europe. Preselected outcome criteria were death (primary), and fever, duration of hospitalization and transfer to an intensive care or burn unit (secondary). RESULTS: GBFDE affected mainly older patients (median age 78 years, interquartile range 68-84 years); 13 of 58 cases died (22%). The mortality rate was slightly but not significantly lower for patients with GBFDE than controls [28%, multivariate odds ratio 0·6 (95% confidence interval 0·30-1·4)]. Patients with GBFDE and controls did not differ in other preselected criteria for severity. CONCLUSIONS: Although our study featured limited statistical power, we were not able to confirm that GBFDE had better prognosis than SJS or SJS/TEN of similar disease extent in older patients. Severe cases of GBFDE deserve the attention and active management given to patients with SJS or TEN.

The role of prior corticosteroid use on the clinical course of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case-control analysis of patients selected from the multinational EuroSCAR and RegiSCAR studies.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are immunologically mediated, severe cutaneous adverse reactions involving cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells and various mediators. In large studies, up to 15% of SJS/TEN occurred in patients with chronic corticosteroid use. It is unclear if this prior exposure to corticosteroids modified the disease course. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether systemic corticosteroid usage prior to the onset of SJS/TEN modified the clinical course and outcome. If a disease-modifying effect is present, information from such an analysis may have implications on the therapeutic use of corticosteroids in SJS/TEN. METHODS: This is a case-control study based on data collected in the EuroSCAR and RegiSCAR studies. Ninety-two cases of SJS/TEN with exposure to corticosteroids prior to the onset of disease, and 321 randomly selected SJS/TEN patients without prior exposure were included. Primary outcomes included progression of disease, disease severity and mortality. A secondary analysis of latency between the beginning of drug use and the onset of disease, based on exposure to a single high-risk drug, was also performed. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, cases with prior exposure to corticosteroids had a longer progression of disease by 2·2 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·1-3·2]. The disease severity and mortality outcome were unaffected. In addition, there is evidence that corticosteroids delayed the onset of SJS/TEN in patients with exposure to high-risk drugs by 7·1 days (CI -0·2 to 14·5). CONCLUSIONS: The prior use of corticosteroids prolonged the period of disease progression without influencing the disease severity or mortality. In addition, when SJS/TEN is preceded by use of a single high-risk drug, the latency between the drug intake and the onset of SJS/TEN may also be increased. These findings suggest that corticosteroids have a mild impact on the course of SJS/TEN, and further studies are required to clarify any potential therapeutic effects.

[Ocular involvement in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis]. / Okuläre Beteiligung bei Stevens-Johnson-Syndrom und Toxisch epidermaler Nekrolyse.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare severe reactions of skin and mucous membranes. They are considered as a single disease entity with differing severities and are mainly induced by drugs, less frequently by infections. In 50% of the patients ocular complications occur, which can lead to blindness in the absence of immediate ophthalmological treatment. The acute pattern, the unpredictable course and extreme variations in the manifestation of complications require an interdisciplinary treatment. Early diagnosis and initiation of an intensive lubricating and anti-inflammatory surface care are of utmost importance for the best visual outcome. This article is intended to help ophthalmologists towards a better understanding and interpretation of clinical signs of these conditions with the goal to achieve substantial improvements in visual outcome and of course the patient's quality of life.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in patients with lupus erythematosus: a descriptive study of 17 cases from a national registry and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe cutaneous adverse reactions with high morbidity and mortality. Some expressions of lupus erythematosus (LE) may cause enormous difficulties in differentiating them from SJS and TEN by showing large areas of sheet-like epidermal necrosis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinically and histopathologically probable or definite cases of SJS/TEN with a history of systemic or other LE [(S)LE]. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of validated cases of SJS/TEN with a history of (S)LE, based on a large population-based national registry. RESULTS: Among 1366 patients with SJS/TEN, 17 with a sufficiently documented history of (S)LE and representative histological material could be identified, suggesting a considerable over-representation of LE in patients with SJS/TEN. Eight of these showed clinically and/or histopathologically some LE-characteristic features interfering with the diagnosis of SJS/TEN. Differentiation could be elaborated on clinical and histopathological grounds: four patients were classified as SJS/TEN with a preceding (S)LE exacerbation and/or LE-typical histopathological features, and four as 'TEN-like' (S)LE. CONCLUSION: Most patients with SJS/TEN and a history of (S)LE demonstrate clinical and histopathological properties allowing clear differentiation. However, occasionally acute cutaneous manifestations of (S)LE and SJS/TEN can be phenotypically similar, caused by extensive epidermal necrosis. Although no feature by itself is conclusive, a combination of recent (S)LE exacerbation, evident photodistribution, annular lesions and absent or only mild focal erosive mucosal involvement may favour LE over SJS/TEN clinically. Histopathologically, in particular, junctional vacuolar alteration, and the presence of solitary necrotic keratinocytes at lower epidermal levels, combined with moderate to dense periadnexal and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates with a variable presence of melanophages, and mucin point to a LE-related origin.

Poor relevance of a lymphocyte proliferation assay in lamotrigine-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis.

BACKGROUND: Prior use of 'lymphocyte transformation test' (LTT) in Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) provided conflicting results, possibly dependent on sampling dates (acute vs. late). OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of LTT in patients with SJS or TEN who reacted to lamotrigine (LTG). In a small subgroup we explored the possible role of regulatory T cells (T-reg). METHODS: Acute phase samples (9) and post-recovery samples (14) from cases of SJS or TEN to LTG were provided by the RegiSCAR-study group. Controls were persons never exposed to LTG (12), patients exposed without reaction (6), and patients who developed a mild eruption to LTG (6). LTT was performed by measuring (3) H-thymidine incorporation after 3 days of incubation with phytohemmaglutinin, LTG (10 µg/mL) or medium. Stimulation index ≥ 2 was considered positive. In 16 cases LTT was redone after depletion of T-reg by fluorescence activated cell sorting. RESULTS: Positive LTT was observed in 3/6 cases of mild eruptions, 1/9 SJS/TEN-cases tested during the acute phase and 3/14 SJS/TEN-cases tested after recovery. We noted a very mild and nonsignificant trend for an increased response after depletion of T-reg in late samples from SJS or TEN patients. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With the largest number of LTT performed in patients with SJS or TEN to a single drug, we confirmed that reactive cells are rarely detected in these reactions. Poor reactivity did not seem related to T-reg. Other in vitro assays than those testing proliferation should be evaluated, before raising the hypothesis that specific cells disappeared by undergoing apoptosis during the reaction.

ALDEN, an algorithm for assessment of drug causality in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: comparison with case-control analysis.

Epidermal necrolysis (EN)--either Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic EN (TEN)--is a severe drug reaction. We constructed and evaluated a specific algorithm, algorithm of drug causality for EN (ALDEN), in order to improve the individual assessment of drug causality in EN. ALDEN causality scores were compared with those from the French pharmacovigilance method in 100 cases and the case-control results of the EuroSCAR study. Scores attributed by ALDEN segregated widely. ALDEN pointed to a "probable" or "very probable" causality in 69/100 cases as compared to 23/100 with the French method (P < 0.001). It scored "very unlikely" causality for 64% of medications vs. none with the French method. Results of ALDEN scores were strongly correlated with those of the EuroSCAR case-control analysis for drugs associated with EN (r = 0.90, P < 0.0001), with probable causality being reported in 218/329 exposures. ALDEN excluded causality in 321 drugs that the case-control analysis had described as "probably not associated" and in 22/233 drugs that had been described as inconclusive exposures. Being more sensitive than a general method, ALDEN, which correlates well with case-control analysis results, can be considered a reference tool in SJS/TEN.

An application of propensity score methods to estimate the treatment effect of corticosteroids in patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether propensity score (ps) methods could reasonably be applied to estimate the treatment effect on mortality, based on a comparatively small sample of patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) and who come from different countries where physicians prefer different treatment schemes. METHODS: Ps methods were applied to cope with confounding due to non-randomized treatment assignment for the analysis of the treatment data obtained in the case-control study EuroSCAR. For the study's purpose, the analysis focused on the comparison of the treatments: corticosteroids (STER) and supportive care only (SUPP). RESULTS: 206 French and German patients were treated either with SUPP or STER. Imbalances between treatment groups as well as between the countries were recognized. Concerning the balance between the treatment groups no ps model for the full cohort was satisfying. In addition, the inclusion of a variable for patient's country led to a separation of the patients by country. Thus, we developed ps models for each country separately and estimated the treatment effects (France: odds ratio (OR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-3.10, Germany: OR 0.23, CI 0.06-0.92, Overall: OR 0.33 CI 0.11-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the ps methods was successful and provided valuable information. We could confirm the findings of the original analysis which was based on standard logistic regression, especially concerning the necessity of a country-specific analysis. The observed country differences in the estimated treatment effects were less pronounced and thus seemed to be more reasonable than those of the past analysis.

Risk factors for acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)-results of a multinational case-control study (EuroSCAR).

BACKGROUND: Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a disease characterized by the rapid occurrence of many sterile, nonfollicular pustules usually arising on an oedematous erythema often accompanied by leucocytosis and fever. It is usually attributed to drugs. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk for different drugs of causing AGEP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multinational case-control study (EuroSCAR) conducted to evaluate the risk for different drugs of causing severe cutaneous adverse reactions; the study included 97 validated community cases of AGEP and 1009 controls. Results Strongly associated drugs, i.e. drugs with a lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the odds ratio (OR) > 5 were pristinamycin (CI 26-infinity), ampicillin/amoxicillin (CI 10-infinity), quinolones (CI 8.5-infinity), (hydroxy)chloroquine (CI 8-infinity), anti-infective sulphonamides (CI 7.1-infinity), terbinafine (CI 7.1-infinity) and diltiazem (CI 5.0-infinity). No significant risk was found for infections and a personal or family history of psoriasis (CI 0.7-2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Medications associated with AGEP differ from those associated with Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Different timing patterns from drug intake to reaction onset were observed for different drugs. Infections, although possible triggers, played no prominent role in causing AGEP and there was no evidence that AGEP is a variant of pustular psoriasis.