Clinical Equivalence of Polyglycolic Acid Suture and Polyglactin 910 Suture for Subcutaneous Tissue Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Blind Randomized Study.

Purpose: The global rise in frequency of cesarean delivery raises the concern to minimize the post-operative complications, in order to improve the maternal and neonatal health. Closure of subcutaneous tissue following cesarean section closes dead space, hence reduces the wound complications. No previous study has compared the clinical equivalence of polyglycolic acid suture with polyglactin 910 suture for subcutaneous tissue closure following cesarean section. Therefore, this study compared the incidence of subcutaneous abdominal wound disruptions within the first 6 weeks of subcutaneous tissue closure with either of the sutures. Patients and Methods: A single-blind, prospective, randomized study was conducted in two centres between February and November, 2021. Primiparous or multiparous women (18-40 years) with a singleton pregnancy requiring cesarean section were randomized to polyglycolic acid suture (Truglyde®) (n=54) and polyglactin 910 suture (Vicryl®) (n=54) group. The primary endpoint, incidence of subcutaneous abdominal wound disruptions within 6 weeks of cesarean delivery was evaluated. In addition, the secondary endpoints, incidence of post-operative subcutaneous abdominal wound disruptions for the study period, skin disruption, surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, hematoma, intraoperative handling, operative time, hospital stay, suture removal, microbial deposits on sutures, pain, time taken to resume normal activities, and adverse events were recorded. Results: Non-significant difference in the incidence of subcutaneous abdominal wound disruptions, skin disruption, SSI, seroma, hematoma, intraoperative handling characteristics, operative time, pain, duration of hospital stay, suture removal, microbial deposits, time taken to return to day-to-day activities, and adverse events were observed between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: Following cesarean section, subcutaneous tissue closure using polyglycolic acid suture or polyglactin 910 suture was not associated with incidence of subcutaneous abdominal wound disruptions. Additionally, non-significant differences regarding secondary endpoints between the groups suggested the clinical equivalence of the sutures. CTRI Registration Number: CTRI/2020/12/029737; Registration date: 11/12/2020.

Single-blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of trulene and prolene polypropylene sutures in elective primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is one of the principle therapies for coronary artery disease, as it improves survival rate and quality of life (QoL). Polypropylene suture is commonly used in vascular and cardiac surgeries for anastomosis due to its long-term tensile strength and minimal tissue trauma. This study compared the clinical equivalence of Trulene® (Healthium Medtech Limited) and Prolene® (Ethicon-Johnson & Johnson) polypropylene sutures regarding incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure and cardiac death (MACCE) occurring up to 26 weeks' period post-CABG surgery. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), single-blind study (n = 89) was conducted between August 2020 and September 2021. The primary endpoint, post-surgery cumulative incidence of MACCE was evaluated. In addition, anastomotic revision, surgical site infection (SSI), operative time, length of post-operative hospital stay, repeat revascularization, intraoperative suture handling characteristics, time taken to return to work and resume normal day to day activities, subject satisfaction score and QoL, and other adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 80 (89.89%) males and 9 (10.11%) females participated in the study. No incidence of MACCE was recorded in any of the study participants. Non-significant difference was observed in anastomotic revision, SSI, operative time, post-operative hospital stay, revascularization, return to work and normal day-to-day activities, subject satisfaction score and QoL, and intraoperative handling parameters (except ease of passage) between the treatment groups, Trulene® and Prolene®. Compared to screening visit, proportion of subjects with 'no problems' for each QoL dimension and the mean visual analogue scale increased with each subsequent follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: Trulene® polypropylene suture is clinically equivalent to Prolene® polypropylene suture and is safe and effective for anastomosis construction in CABG surgery during a routine clinical procedure. Trial registration CTRI Registration No.: CTRI/2020/05/025157 (Registered on: 13/05/2020).

Single blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of Trusilk ® and Mersilk ® silk sutures for mucosal closure following surgical removal of mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar.

Background: Mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar is a common dental anomaly, for which surgical extraction is required. Post-surgery closure of mucosa reduces the prevalence of pain and other surgery-associated complications. We compared tissue reaction/inflammation after 3 and 7 days of mucosal closure with Trusilk ® and Mersilk ® silk sutures, following impacted mandibular third molar removal. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), single-blind study (July 2020-November 2021) included subjects (Trusilk ®, n=65 and Mersilk ®, n=64), requiring mucosal suturing following impacted mandibular third molar removal. The primary endpoint, incidence of pain, swelling and trismus at the extraction area on post-surgery day 3 and 7 was evaluated. The secondary endpoints, incidence of tissue reaction, wound infection, suture loosening, other complications, operative time, amount of anesthesia, intraoperative suture handling, time needed for complete wound healing and suture removal, and adverse events were also recorded. Results: Socio-demographic and intra-oral characteristics were comparable between the groups. In Trusilk ® and Mersilk ® groups, a gradually decreasing pain score, starting from day 0 post-surgery (42.17±22.38 vs. 45.97±22.20) to day 7 (8.40±11.93 vs. 8.28±12.13) to day 30 (1.98±0.89 vs. 1.75±0.76) was witnessed. After the surgery, 21.54% and 17.19% subjects in Trusilk ® and Mersilk ® groups, respectively, had no post-operative swelling, while at the last two visits none of the subjects had swelling. Non-significant difference in wound infection, suture loosening, wound healing, bleeding, taste changes, operative time, amount of anesthesia, intraoperative suture handling, and time needed for complete wound healing and suture removal was noted among the groups. No suture-related adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: The results indicated that the Trusilk ® and Mersilk ® silk sutures are clinically equivalent and can be used for mucosal closure after removal of an impacted mandibular third molar with a minimal rate of pain, swelling and trismus. Clinical Trial Registry of India Registration: CTRI/2020/03/024100 (20/03/2020).