[Treatment of neuropathic pain in neurology units. The PREVADOL study]. / Tratamiento del dolor neuropático en las consultas de neurología. Estudio PREVADOL.

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic pain (NPP) is defined as a pain started or caused by an injury to or dysfunction of the nervous system. Its treatment is different to that of nociceptive pain since it does not respond to conventional analgesics or non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. AIM: To describe the treatment being received by patients with NPP in the daily clinical practice of the specialist in neurology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, epidemiological, cross-sectional study was conducted in 36 neurology units (24 extra-hospital and 12 belonging to hospitals). We collected the clinical data and the treatment administered to the first 20 patients with NPP to visit the neurology units over a period of 20 consecutive working days. RESULTS: Data were collected for a total of 451 patients with NPP. The pharmacological groups most frequently used in patients with NPP attended in neurology units are antiepileptics (71%) and antidepressants (15%). Of these patients, 60% were being treated with a single drug (an antiepileptic agent in 84.5% of cases; antidepressants in 10.3%). Two pharmacological treatments were being received by 23.7%, and 2.3% of patients were given treatment involving three or more pharmacological agents. A total of 30% received non-pharmacological treatments, especially physiotherapy (50.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with NPP attended in neurology units follow first-order pharmacological treatments (antiepileptics or antidepressants). Over half the patients are controlled with monotherapy, usually with an antiepileptic agent. Non-pharmacological treatments (especially physiotherapy) are used in a third of the patients.

[Epidemiological study of prevalence, incidence and neuropathic pain characterization in neurology units. PREVADOL study]. / Estudio de prevalencia, incidencia y caracterización del dolor neuropático en consultas de neurología. Estudio PREVADOL.

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic pain is defined as a pain initiated or caused by a lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system. The objectives of the study were to estimate the prevalence and incidence of neuropathic pain in hospital neurology units and primary care centres, to characterize the clinical profile of the patient with neuropathic pain and to know the most frequent treatments in the pharmacological management of this type of pain. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional epidemiological survey carried out in 36 Neurology Units of the national territory (24 primary care centres and 12 hospitals). During 20 consecutive days neurologists collected the diagnoses of all the attended patients by any reason, up to 30 patients/day. In parallel the 20 first consecutive patients with neuropathic pain were chosen for their characterization in depth by means of a specific questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 12,688 patients were attended and a total of 13,555 diagnoses were collected through 713 consultation days. The most frequent diagnosis was migraine/cephalea, with a prevalence of 23.40% (95% CI: 22.66%-24.14%). Neuropathic pain represented the eighth more frequent diagnosis, with a prevalence in neurology units of 3.88% (95% CI: 3.54%- 4.22%). The prevalence of neuropathic pain was 2.92% in primary care centres and 6.09% in hospital units (p < 0.01). The daily incidence of new neuropathic pain cases was 1.24% (95% CI: 1.05%-1.53%); 1.14% in primary care neurology centres and 1.45% in hospital units. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained indicate that neuropathic pain is the eighth more frequent diagnosis in the neurology units. Medical assistance request by neuropathic pain is higher in the hospital units.

[Sphincter function disorders. physiopathology and neurophysiological study]. / Trastornos de la funcion esfinteriana. Fisiopatología y estudio neurofisiológico.

Miction and defecation disturbances are very frequent in the general population and far more so among neurological patients. It is essential to know the physiopathology of these disorders in clinical practice. The neurological control of these functions is carried out by automatisms that are regulated in the nuclei of the brain stem through somatic and vegetative peripheral structures that act simultaneously. The cortical, hypothalamic and reticular levels play a part in the activation or inhibition of the pontine nuclei. Continence depends on the integrity of the anatomical structures and the sensory, pressure and mechanical systems that enable the automatisms to develop. Neurological examination must be combined with studies conducted by other specialists on patients in which no neurological illness is known, but who have this kind of dysfunction. Adding a neurophysiological examination allows us to complete the clinical study and to check objectively for the existence of external anal sphincter denervation or disorders involving the exteroceptive reflexes of the sacrum. The recent appearance of techniques for treating incontinence that make use of the repeated and continuous stimulation of the sacral roots has revolutionised the way these patients are treated and calls for greater involvement of neurologists in dealing with these problems.

[Congenital neuromyotonia. Retrospective study of 4 cases]. / Neuromiotonía congénita. Estudio retrospectivo de cuatro casos.

BACKGROUND: Fasciculation, double discharge, myokymia and neuromyotonia are different kinds of involuntary muscular activity that originate in ectopic discharges of the motor axons. Electrophysiological studies are needed in all cases for the diagnosis. Non rigorous electrophysiological studies in some cases is the cause of the historically unclear nosological delimitation of the neuromyotonic syndromes. OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical picture and electrophysiological findings in patients with congenital neuromyotonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients with congenital neuromyotonia were studied. Electrophysiological exam included nerve conduction measurements, study of the after-discharges and conventional EMG. Spontaneous discharges were displayed after applying a low pass filter, signal trigger and delay line. RESULTS: In one case positive motor features predominate (continuous muscle fiber activity). On the contrary, two cases, showed neuropathic deficitary signs with a Charcot-Marie-Tooth type II disease phenotype; neuromyotonia was, in both cases, an electrophysiological feature. In the last patient, motor signs were limited to the facial muscles but electrophysiological study discovered generalized neuromyotonia. Treatment with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine was useful in the four cases. CONCLUSION: Congenital neuromyotonia is a clinically heterogeneous syndrome with uniform electrophysiological features that permit its qualification.

[Treatment of Guillain-barre syndrome: immunoglobulins or plasmapheresis?]. / Tratamiento del síndrome de Guillain-Barré: inmunoglobulinas o plasmaféresis?

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of IgIV versus plasmapheresis in the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Twenty-four Guillain-Barré patients were treated either with IgIV (n = 17), or plasmapheresis (n = 7). Evolution during the first year after onset were assessed using the motor functional scale of Hughes and nerve conduction studies. IgIV treated patients had better functional recovery than the plasmapheresis group (p < 0.05) and shorter hospital stays (p < 0.05). These differences were significant from day 30 after treatment. Complications occurred in 14 patients: 9 (58%) in the IgIV group, and 5 (71%) in the patients treated with plasmapheresis. IgIV treated patients had better functional recovery scores and shorter hospital stays. There were no differences in the complication rates. Therefore we believe that IgIV is the treatment of choice for Guillain-Barré syndrome in our clinical setting.

[Electroneurographic parameters in cubital neuropathy of the elbow]. / Diferentes parámetros electroneurográficos en la neuropatía cubital en el codo. Interés de la conducción sensitiva antidrómica.

Using conventional techniques with cutaneous electrodes, 14 parameters of antidromic, motor and mixed segmentary sensory conduction of the cubital nerve were assessed in the first 45 patients presenting to us with some form of electroneurographic abnormality. Changes suggestive of axonal degeneration due to a decrease in amplitude or conduction velocity of the distal segment were found in 17. The remaining 28 patients showed only signs of change in conduction velocity at the elbow and could be classified according to electroneurographic degrees of progressive abnormality. Changes in antidromic sensory conduction are early and constant, constituting the parameter of choice for detection of slight compressive neuropathy.