RESUMEN
Surgical treatment of complex intestinal atresia is challenging. Moreover, multiple surgical techniques have been described to treat these congenital malformations. As no single/universal technique is useful for every patient, individualized surgical treatment for these complex cases is mandatory. Isolated apple peel atresia (type IIIb), in coexistence with other types of atresia, is a rare event with a poor functional prognosis, which is difficult to treat surgically. Furthermore, the ability to achieve good surgical results becomes more difficult in resource-limited health facilities, such as the Hospital Pediatrico Moctezuma (Mexico City). The objective of this case report of two full-term female newborns with isolated apple peel atresia and an apple peel malformation with distal type IV atresia is to describe the successful surgical technique used in these patients and how to deal with certain postsurgical complications.
RESUMEN
Background: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) ought to be determined taking into account individual ischaemic or bleeding events risks. To date, studies have provided inconclusive evidence on the effects of prolonged DAPT. We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes of this strategy following percutaneous revascularization in the context of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: Retrospectively from four centers in Madrid, we identified 750 consecutive ACS patients, divided in two groups of DAPT duration: <13 months and >13 months, with a mean follow-up of 48 months. Results: Patients with DAPT > 13 months had a higher non-adjusted incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (11.6% vs. 17.3%) and new revascularization (3.7% vs. 8.7%). Differences in all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke were non-significant. There was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding (7.4% vs. 6.3%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the independent risk predictors of MACE were age (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, p < 0.001) and multivessel disease (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.32-3.95, p = 0.003), whereas the independent protective predictor was normal hemoglobin (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, p = 0.022). Conclusions: In this real-world registry cohort of ACS patients treated with PCI and 1 year of DAPT in Spain, we report a trend of increased rate of MACE and new revascularization not associated with TVR in patients with longer DAPT. Our findings support the need for future randomized controlled trials to confirm or refute these results.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the performance of the recent CASTLE score to J-CTO, CL and PROGRESS CTO scores in a comprehensive database of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion procedures. METHODS: Scores were calculated using raw data from 1,342 chronic total occlusion procedures included in REBECO Registry that includes learning and expert operators. Calibration, discrimination and reclassification were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Mean score values were: CASTLE 1.60±1.10, J-CTO 2.15±1.24, PROGRESS 1.68±0.94 and CL 2.52±1.52 points. The overall percutaneous coronary intervention success rate was 77.8%. Calibration was good for CASTLE and CL, but not for J-CTO or PROGRESS scores. Discrimination: the area under the curve (AUC) of CASTLE (0.633) was significantly higher than PROGRESS (0.557) and similar to J-CTO (0.628) and CL (0.652). Reclassification: CASTLE, as assessed by integrated discrimination improvement, was superior to PROGRESS (integrated discrimination improvement +0.036, p<0.001), similar to J-CTO and slightly inferior to CL score (- 0.011, p = 0.004). Regarding net reclassification improvement, CASTLE reclassified better than PROGRESS (overall continuous net reclassification improvement 0.379, p<0.001) in roughly 20% of cases. CONCLUSION: Procedural percutaneous coronary intervention difficulty is not consistently depicted by available chronic total occlusion scores and is influenced by the characteristics of each chronic total occlusion cohort. In our study population, including expert and learning operators, the CASTLE score had slightly better overall performance along with CL score. However, we found only intermediate performance in the c-statistic predicting chronic total occlusion success among all scores.