Manual mastery vs. mechanized magic: current opinions on manual vs. mechanical chest compressions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mechanical chest compression devices are increasingly deployed during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We discuss the data supporting the use of mechanical chest compression devices during cardiac arrest and provide an opinion about the future of the technology. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple randomized trials investigating the use of mechanical chest compression devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have not demonstrated improved outcomes. There is little prospective evidence to support the use of mechanical chest compression devices in other settings. Data from observational studies do not support the routine use of mechanical chest compression devices for in-hospital cardiac arrest, but there may be a role for mechanical chest compressions for cardiac arrest in procedural areas and cardiac arrest prior to cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. SUMMARY: Mechanical chest compression devices offer a solution to some of the human limiting factors of resuscitation, but have failed to demonstrate meaningful improvement in outcomes from cardiac arrest. Routine use of mechanical chest compression devices during cardiac arrest is not supported by evidence.

The Discover In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (Discover IHCA) Study: An Investigation of Hospital Practices After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

IMPORTANCE: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a significant public health burden. Rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) have been improving, but the best way to care for patients after the initial resuscitation remains poorly understood, and improvements in survival to discharge are stagnant. Existing North American cardiac arrest databases lack comprehensive data on the post-resuscitation period, and we do not know current post-IHCA practice patterns. To address this gap, we developed the Discover In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (Discover IHCA) study, which will thoroughly evaluate current post-IHCA care practices across a diverse cohort. OBJECTIVES: Our study collects granular data on post-IHCA treatment practices, focusing on temperature control and prognostication, with the objective of describing variation in current post-IHCA practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a multicenter, prospectively collected, observational cohort study of patients who have suffered IHCA and have been successfully resuscitated (achieved ROSC). There are 24 enrolling hospital systems (23 in the United States) with 69 individual enrolling hospitals (39 in the United States). We developed a standardized data dictionary, and data collection began in October 2023, with a projected 1000 total enrollments. Discover IHCA is endorsed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. INTERVENTIONS, OUTCOMES, AND ANALYSIS: The study collects data on patient characteristics including pre-arrest frailty, arrest characteristics, and detailed information on post-arrest practices and outcomes. Data collection on post-IHCA practice was structured around current American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council guidelines. Among other data elements, the study captures post-arrest temperature control interventions and post-arrest prognostication methods. Analysis will evaluate variations in practice and their association with mortality and neurologic function. CONCLUSIONS: We expect this study, Discover IHCA, to identify variability in practice and outcomes following IHCA, and be a vital resource for future investigations into best-practice for managing patients after IHCA.

Resuscitation of patients with durable mechanical circulatory support with acutely altered perfusion or cardiac arrest: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing prevalence of durable mechanical circulatory supported patients in both the in-and-out of hospital communities. The scientific literature regarding the approach to patients supported by durable mechanical circulatory devices who suffer acutely impaired perfusion has not been well explored. METHODS: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Advanced, Basic, and Pediatric Life Support Task Forces conducted a scoping review of the literature using a population, context, and concept framework. RESULTS: A total of 32 publications that included patients who were receiving durable mechanical circulatory support and required acute resuscitation were identified. Most of the identified studies were case reports or small case series. Of these, 11 (34.4%) included patients who received chest compressions. A number of studies reported upon delays in the application of chest compressions resulting from complexity due to the expected pulselessness in some patients with continuous flow left-ventricular assist devices as well as from concern regarding potential dislodgement of the mechanical circulatory support device. Three observational studies identified worse outcomes in durable mechanical circulatory support receiving patients with cardiac arrest and acutely impaired perfusion who received chest compressions as compared to those who did not, however those studies were at high risk of bias. Of 226 patients across 11 studies and two published scientific abstracts who sustained cardiac arrest while supported by durable MCS and underwent chest compressions, there were no reported instances of device dislodgement and 71 (31.4%) patients had favorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is a scarcity of evidence to inform the resuscitation of patients with durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) experiencing acute impairment in perfusion and cardiac arrest. Reports indicate that delays in resuscitation often stem from rescuers' uncertainty about the safety of administering chest compressions. Notably, no instances of device dislodgement have been documented following chest compressions, suggesting that the risk of harm from timely CPR in these patients is minimal.

Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a significant public health burden. Rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) have been improving, but the best way to care for patients after the initial resuscitation remains poorly understood, and improvements in survival to discharge are stagnant. Existing North American cardiac arrest databases lack comprehensive data on the postresuscitation period, and we do not know current post-IHCA practice patterns. To address this gap, we developed the Discover IHCA study, which will thoroughly evaluate current post-IHCA care practices across a diverse cohort. OBJECTIVES: Our study collects granular data on post-IHCA treatment practices, focusing on temperature control and prognostication, with the objective of describing variation in current post-IHCA practices. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a multicenter, prospectively collected, observational cohort study of patients who have suffered IHCA and have been successfully resuscitated (achieved ROSC). There are 24 enrolling hospital systems (23 in the United States) with 69 individuals enrolling in hospitals (39 in the United States). We developed a standardized data dictionary, and data collection began in October 2023, with a projected 1000 total enrollments. Discover IHCA is endorsed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The study collects data on patient characteristics, including prearrest frailty, arrest characteristics, and detailed information on postarrest practices and outcomes. Data collection on post-IHCA practice was structured around current American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council guidelines. Among other data elements, the study captures postarrest temperature control interventions and postarrest prognostication methods. RESULTS: The majority of participating hospital systems are large, academic, tertiary care centers serving urban populations. The analysis will evaluate variations in practice and their association with mortality and neurologic function. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We expect this study, Discover IHCA, to identify variability in practice and outcomes following IHCA and be a vital resource for future investigations into best practices for managing patients after IHCA.

Exploration of alive-and-ventilator free days as an outcome measure for clinical trials of Resuscitative interventions.

BACKGROUND: Outcome selection is a critically important aspect of clinical trial design. Alive-and-ventilator free days is an outcome measure commonly used in critical care clinical trials, but has not been fully explored in resuscitation science. METHODS: A simulation study was performed to explore approaches to the definition and analysis of alive-and-ventilator free days in cardiac arrest populations. Data from an in-hospital cardiac arrest observational cohort and from the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial were used to inform and conduct the simulations and validate approaches to alive-and-ventilator free days measurement and analysis. FINDINGS: Alive-and-ventilator-free days is a flexible outcome measure in cardiac arrest populations. An approach to alive-and-ventilator free days that assigns -1 days when return of spontaneous circulation is not achieved provides a wider distribution of the outcome and improves statistical power. The optimal approach to the analysis of alive-and-ventilator free days varies based on the expected impact of the intervention under study on rates of return of spontaneous circulation, survival, and ventilator-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Alive-and-ventilator free days adds to the armamentarium of clinical trialists in the field of resuscitation science.

Medication use evaluation of tocilizumab implementation in COVID-19 treatment guidelines: A causal inference approach.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Introduction of new medications to health-system formularies is often not accompanied by assessments of their clinical impact on the local patient population. The growing availability of electronic health record (EHR) data and advancements in pharmacoepidemiology methods offer institutions the opportunity to monitor the medication implementation process and assess clinical effectiveness in the local clinical context. In this study, we applied novel causal inference methods to evaluate the effects of a formulary policy introducing tocilizumab therapy for critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We conducted a medication use evaluation utilizing EHR data from patients admitted to a large medical center during the 6 months before and after implementation of a formulary policy endorsing the use of tocilizumab for treatment of COVID-19. The impact of tocilizumab on 28-day all-cause mortality was assessed using a difference-in-differences analysis, with ineligible patients serving as a nonequivalent control group, and a matched analysis guided by a target trial emulation framework. Safety endpoints assessed included the incidence of secondary infections and liver enzyme elevations. Our findings were benchmarked against clinical trials, an observational study, and a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Following guideline modification, tocilizumab was administered to 69% of eligible patients. This implementation was associated with a 3.1% absolute risk reduction in 28-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.86; number needed to treat to prevent one death, 32) attributable to the inclusion of tocilizumab in the guidelines and an additional 8.6% absolute risk reduction (odds ratio, 0.65; number needed to treat to prevent one death, 12) linked to its administration. These findings were consistent with estimates from published literature, although the effect estimates from the difference-in-differences analysis exhibited imprecision. CONCLUSION: Evaluating formulary management decisions through novel causal inference approaches offers valuable estimates of clinical effectiveness and the potential to optimize the impact of new medications on population outcomes.

Noninvasive Ventilation for Preoxygenation during Emergency Intubation.

BACKGROUND: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, hypoxemia increases the risk of cardiac arrest and death. The effect of preoxygenation with noninvasive ventilation, as compared with preoxygenation with an oxygen mask, on the incidence of hypoxemia during tracheal intubation is uncertain. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 24 emergency departments and intensive care units in the United States, we randomly assigned critically ill adults (age, ≥18 years) undergoing tracheal intubation to receive preoxygenation with either noninvasive ventilation or an oxygen mask. The primary outcome was hypoxemia during intubation, defined by an oxygen saturation of less than 85% during the interval between induction of anesthesia and 2 minutes after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: Among the 1301 patients enrolled, hypoxemia occurred in 57 of 624 patients (9.1%) in the noninvasive-ventilation group and in 118 of 637 patients (18.5%) in the oxygen-mask group (difference, -9.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.2 to -5.6; P<0.001). Cardiac arrest occurred in 1 patient (0.2%) in the noninvasive-ventilation group and in 7 patients (1.1%) in the oxygen-mask group (difference, -0.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.8 to -0.1). Aspiration occurred in 6 patients (0.9%) in the noninvasive-ventilation group and in 9 patients (1.4%) in the oxygen-mask group (difference, -0.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.6 to 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, preoxygenation with noninvasive ventilation resulted in a lower incidence of hypoxemia during intubation than preoxygenation with an oxygen mask. (Funded by the U.S. Department of Defense; PREOXI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05267652.).

Experiential Learning with Ketamine: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study on Prescription and Perception.

Background: Incorporating unfamiliar therapies into practice requires effective longitudinal learning and the optimal way to achieve this is debated. Though not a novel therapy, ketamine in critical care has a paucity of data and variable acceptance, with limited research describing intensivist perceptions and utilization. The Coronavirus-19 pandemic presented a particular crisis where providers rapidly adapted analgosedation strategies to achieve prolonged, deep sedation due to a surge of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Question: How does clinical experience with ketamine impact the perception and attitude of clinicians toward this therapy? Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study using quantitative ketamine prescription data and qualitative focus group data. We analyzed prescription patterns of ketamine in a tertiary academic ICU during two different time points: pre-COVID-19 (March 1-June 30, 2019) and during the COVID-19 surge (March 1-June 30, 2020). Two focus groups (FG) of critical care attendings were held, and data were analyzed using the Framework Method for content analysis. Results: Four-hundred forty-six medical ICU patients were mechanically ventilated (195 pre-COVID-19 and 251 during COVID-19). The COVID-19 population was more likely to receive ketamine (81[32.3%] vs 4 [2.1%], p < 0.001). Thirteen respondents participated across two FG sessions (Pre-COVID = 8, Post-COVID=5). The most prevalent attitude among our respondents was discomfort, with three key themes identified as follows: 1) lack of evidence regarding ketamine, 2) lack of personal experience, and 3) desire for more education and protocols. Conclusion: Despite a substantial increase in ketamine prescription during COVID-19, intensivists continued to feel discomfort with utilization. Factors contributing to this discomfort include a lack of evidence, a lack of experience, and a desire for more education and protocols. Increase in experience with ketamine alone was not sufficient to minimize provider discomfort. These findings should inform future curricula and call for process improvement to optimize continuing education.

Thiamine as a metabolic resuscitator after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Thiamine is a key cofactor for aerobic metabolism, previously shown to improve mortality and neurological outcomes in a mouse model of cardiac arrest. We hypothesized that thiamine would decrease lactate and improve outcomes in post-arrest patients. METHODS: Single center, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial of thiamine in adults within 4.5 hours of return of spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), with coma and lactate ≥ 3 mmol/L. Participants received 500 mg IV thiamine or placebo twice daily for 2 days. Randomization was stratified by lactate > 5 or ≤ 5 mmol/L. The primary outcome of lactate was checked at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 hours, and compared using a linear mixed model to account for repeated measures. Secondary outcomes included SOFA score, pyruvate dehydrogenase, renal injury, neurological outcome, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 93 randomized patients, 76 were enrolled and included in the analysis. There was no difference in lactate over 24 hours (mean difference 0.34 mmol/L (95% CI: -1.82, 2.50), p = 0.43). There was a significant interaction between randomization lactate subgroup and the effect of the intervention on mortality (p = 0.01) such that mortality was higher with thiamine in the lactate > 5 mmol/L group and lower with thiamine in the < 5 mmol/L group. This subgroup difference prompted the Data and Safety Monitoring Board to recommend the study be terminated early. PDH activity increased over 72 hours in the thiamine group. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this single-center randomized trial, thiamine did not affect lactate over 24 hours after OHCA.

Thiamine as a metabolic resuscitator after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated lactate is associated with mortality after cardiac arrest. Thiamine, a cofactor of pyruvate dehydrogenase, is necessary for aerobic metabolism. In a mouse model of cardiac arrest, thiamine improved pyruvate dehydrogenase activity, survival and neurologic outcome. AIM: To determine if thiamine would decrease lactate and increase oxygen consumption after in-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Adult patients with arrest within 12 hours, mechanically ventilated, with lactate ≥ 3 mmol/L were included. Randomization was stratified by lactate > 5 or ≤ 5 mmol/L. Thiamine 500 mg or placebo was administered every 12 hours for 3 days. The primary outcome of lactate was checked at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and compared using a linear mixed model, accounting for repeated measures. Secondary outcomes included oxygen consumption, pyruvate dehydrogenase, and mortality. RESULTS: Enrollments stopped after 36 patients due Data Safety and Monitoring Board concern about potential harm in an unplanned subgroup analysis. There was no overall difference in lactate (mean difference at 48 hours 1.5 mmol/L [95% CI -3.1-6.1], global p = 0.88) or any secondary outcomes. In those with randomization lactate > 5 mmol/L, mortality was 92% (11/12) with thiamine and 67% (8/12) with placebo (p = 0.32). In those with randomization lactate ≤ 5 mmol/L mortality was 17% (1/6) with thiamine and 67% (4/6) with placebo (p = 0.24). There was a significant interaction between randomization lactate and the effect of thiamine on survival (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this single center trial thiamine had no overall effect on lactate after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Corticosteroids to Reduce Inflammation in Severe Pancreatitis (CRISP) protocol and statistical analysis plan: a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis is a common disease which, in its severe form, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is no specific therapy known to attenuate organ failure in severe pancreatitis and treatment consists primarily of supportive care. Corticosteroids have been shown to be beneficial in disease processes associated with systemic inflammation and could potentially improve outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis. METHODS: The Corticosteroids to Reduce Inflammation in Severe Pancreatitis (CRISP) trial is a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that aims to determine the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on organ injury in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Patients are randomized to receive 100 mg of hydrocortisone parenterally versus matching placebo every 8 h for 3 days. Clinical and laboratory data are collected at the time of study enrollment, at 24, 48 and 72 h. The primary end-point for the trial is the difference in 72-h change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between hydrocortisone and placebo groups. Additional key secondary outcomes include ventilator free days and 28-day mortality. DISCUSSION: This study will add to the evidence base in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. The results will inform clinical practice and future studies in the field. Trial registration number The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05160506). It was posted on December 16th, 2021. The study protocol was approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Committee on Clinical Investigation (CCI) (protocol 2021 P-000803).

Thiamine administration in septic shock: a post hoc analysis of two randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: This is a post hoc analysis of combined cohorts from two previous Phase II clinical trials to assess the effect of thiamine administration on kidney protection and mortality in patients with septic shock. METHODS: Patient-level data from the Thiamine in Septic Shock Trial (NCT01070810) and the Thiamine for Renal Protection in Septic Shock Trial (NCT03550794) were combined in this analysis. The primary outcome for the current study was survival without the receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Analyses were performed on the overall cohort and the thiamine-deficient cohort (thiamine < 8 nmol/L). RESULTS: Totally, 158 patients were included. Overall, thiamine administration was associated with higher odds of being alive and RRT-free (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.90]) and not needing RRT (aOR: 2.59 [95% CI 1.01-6.62]). In the thiamine-deficient group, thiamine administration was associated with higher odds of being alive and RRT-free (aOR: 8.17 [95% CI 1.79-37.22]) and surviving to hospital discharge (aOR: 6.84 [95% CI 1.54-30.36]). There was a significant effect modification by baseline thiamine deficiency for alive and RRT-free (interaction, p = 0.016) and surviving to hospital discharge (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: In the combined analysis of two previous randomized trials, thiamine administration was associated with higher odds of being alive and RRT-free at hospital discharge in patients with septic shock. This signal was stronger in patients with thiamine deficiency.

The association between mechanical CPR and outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational cohort study.

AIM: We sought to investigate the relationship between mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during in-hospital cardiac arrest and survival to hospital discharge. METHODS: Utilizing the prospectively collected American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines database, we performed an observational study. Data from 153 institutions across the United States were reviewed with a total of 351,125 patients suffering cardiac arrest between 2011 and 2019 were screened. After excluding patients with cardiac arrests lasting less than 5 minutes, and patients who had incomplete data, a total of 111,143 patients were included. Our primary exposure was mechanical vs. manual CPR, and the primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Multivariate logistic regression models and propensity weighted analyses were used. RESULTS: 11.8% of patients who received mechanical CPR survived to hospital discharge versus 16.9% in the manual CPR group. Patients who received mechanical CPR had a lower probability of survival to discharge compared to patients who received manual CPR (OR 0.66 95% CI 0.58-0.75; p < 0.001). This association persisted with multi-variable adjustment (OR 0.57 95% CI 0.46-0.70, p < 0.0001) and propensity weighted analysis (OR 0.68 95% CI 0.44-0 0.92, p < 0.0001). Mechanical CPR was associated with decrease likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation after multivariate adjustment (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.60-0.76; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical CPR was associated with a decreased likelihood of survival to hospital discharge and ROSC compared to manual CPR. This finding should be interpreted within the context of important limitations of this study and randomized trials are needed to better investigate this relationship.

Thiamine as adjunctive therapy for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKAT) trial protocol and statistical analysis plan: a prospective, single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a potentially life-threatening diabetic complication. Despite the high prevalence of DKA and the substantial associated healthcare burden, limited research on strategies to improve outcomes currently exists.Thiamine (vitamin B1) is a cofactor of pyruvate dehydrogenase, which plays a key role in aerobic glucose metabolism. Thiamine deficiency is common in patients with DKA, resulting in a shift to anaerobic metabolism and hyperlactatemia, which can prolong and complicate recovery. Therefore, we hypothesise that thiamine administration will improve aerobic metabolism and lead to faster resolution of acidemia in patients with DKA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel group interventional trial, 100 patients admitted to the hospital with DKA will be randomised to receive either intravenous thiamine (200 mg in 50 mL 0.9% saline) or placebo (0.9% saline identical in appearance and volume) two times per day for 2 days. The primary outcome will be the change in bicarbonate level over 24 hours as compared between the two treatment groups. Additional secondary outcomes include the change over time in anion gap, lactate levels, oxygen consumption by circulating mononuclear cells, intensive care unit and hospital length-of-stay and hospital resource usage when comparing the two study arms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was approved by the Committee on Clinical Investigations, the institutional review board of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (protocol number 2018P000475). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and professional conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03717896; clinicaltrials.gov.

A multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine to stimulate awakening in comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the administration of amantadine would increase awakening of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial, randomizing subjects to amantadine 100 mg twice daily or placebo for up to 7 days. The study drug was administered between 72 and 120 hours after resuscitation and patients with absent N20 cortical responses, early cerebral edema, or ongoing malignant electroencephalography patterns were excluded. Our primary outcome was awakening, defined as following two-step commands, within 28 days of cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, awakening, time to awakening, and neurologic outcome measured by Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge. We compared the proportion of subjects awakening and hospital survival using Fisher exact tests and time to awakening and hospital length of stay using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: After 2 years, we stopped the study due to slow enrollment and lapse of funding. We enrolled 14 subjects (12% of goal enrollment), seven in the amantadine group and seven in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who awakened within 28 days after cardiac arrest did not differ between amantadine (n=2, 28.6%) and placebo groups (n=3, 42.9%; P>0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Study medication was stopped in three subjects (21.4%). Adverse events included a recurrence of seizures (n=2; 14.3%), both of which occurred in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: We could not determine the effect of amantadine on awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest due to small sample size.

Design and implementation of the hospital airway resuscitation trial.

Guidelines for the management of in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation are often drawn from evidence generated in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest populations and applied to the in-hospital setting. Approach to airway management during resuscitation is one example of this phenomenon, with the recommendation to place either a supraglottic airway or endotracheal tube when performing advanced airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest based mainly in clinical trials conducted in the out-of-hospital setting. The Hospital Airway Resuscitation Trial (HART) is a pragmatic cluster-randomized superiority trial comparing a strategy of first choice supraglottic airway to a strategy of first choice endotracheal intubation during resuscitation from in-hospital cardiac arrest. The design includes a number of innovative elements such as a highly pragmatic design drawing from electronic health records and a novel primary outcome measure for cardiac arrest trials-alive-and-ventilator free days. Many of the topics explored in the design of HART have wide relevance to other trials in in-hospital cardiac arrest populations.