Cancer diagnosis in Catalonia (Spain) after two years of COVID-19 pandemic: an incomplete recovery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to estimate potential undetected cancers over the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic in Catalonia. METHODS: Cancer incidence was compared between pre-pandemic (2019) and pandemic (March 2020-January 2022) periods in the Catalan Pathology Registry (CPR) according to sex, age, and tumor site. The correlation between cancer diagnosis and COVID-19 health care workload was also evaluated by means of the Pearson's correlation coefficient (R). The expected incident cancers (E) during the pandemic were estimated by applying 2019 CPR cancer incidence specific rates by sex and 5-year age groups to the 2020 and 2021 Catalan population pyramids. CPR incident cancers were considered observed (O). Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the O/E ratio. RESULTS: After two pandemic years, cancer diagnosis decreased by 12% (SIR 0.88, 95% CI 0.87-0.89), or ∼7700 undetected cancers (13 000 with nonmelanoma skin cancer). Without nonmelanoma skin cancer, 72% of the cancer underdiagnosis was generated in 2020. Diagnoses decreased more in men (whole pandemic -14%; 2020 -21%; 2021 -8%) than in women (-9%, -19%, -3%, respectively), dropping significantly overall in all pandemic waves but the fifth (first -37%, second -16%, third -8%, fourth -6%, fifth -2%, sixth -6%), and across all adult age groups. In the first wave, CPR cancer diagnosis was inversely correlated with COVID-19 caseload in primary care (R -0.91, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.75) and occupancy in conventional hospital wards (R -0.91, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.48) and intensive care (R -0.91, 95% CI 95% -0.98 to -0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Our study evaluated the overall pandemic impact on cancer diagnosis on a large scale and with minimal selection bias, showing that as of February 2022, cancer detection in Catalonia had not yet recovered to pre-pandemic levels. Pending cancer incidence data from population-based cancer registries, early CPR data could inform the development of Spanish cancer control plans.

[Endovascular treatment of carotid disease in patients at high surgical risk]. / Tratamiento endovascular de la enfermedad carotídea en pacientes de alto riesgo.

AIMS: To analyse the perioperative morbi-mortality rates during the first 30 days following endovascular therapy in patients with carotid stenosis and important risk factors for surgery. We also sought to determine the survival rate, the percentage of patients that were stroke-free and the percentage of cases of restenosis during the follow-up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on a series of 100 patients with symptomatic > 50% and asymptomatic > 70% carotid stenosis, who underwent endovascular therapy between January 2000 and December 2006 because of the important risk factors they presented. Monitoring was clinical and was performed by means of carotid Doppler scanning. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample: 72.2 years (46-86). Perioperative morbi-mortality of the series: 6% (confidence interval, CI 95% = 0.8-11.2) and in the symptomatic stenosis group: 5.7% (CI 95% = 1.8-12.9). The mean follow-up time was 23.4 months (0-94). Total mortality of the series during the follow-up was 7% (CI 95% = 1.4-12.5). The probability of survival at 3 and 5 years is 93 and 89%, respectively. At one year, 98.9% of the patients remained stroke-free. Restenosis of the stent occurred in 5% (CI 95% = 1.6-11.2). The probability of restenosis not occurring was 96.75% at 6 months and 94% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Stent angioplasty is an effective form of treatment in carotid stenosis in patients with important risk factors for surgery and it is therefore important to fulfil patient selection protocols and avoid perioperative complications.

Portal vein thrombosis in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation: intraoperative endovascular radiological procedures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of endovascular procedures for portal vein complications during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1994 and November 2004, we performed 504 OLTs in 464 adults. Seventy-eight patients (16.8%) presented with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This analysis of patients from May 2000 to September 2004 included 10 patients with PVT, who were treated with endovascular techniques due to low portal flow. We compared this group with patients who were treated surgically with attention to rethrombosis and survival rates. If portal vein problems were due to obstruction, a venoplasty and primary stent placement were performed. We also embolized with coils or surgically ligated remaining competitive portosystemic shunts. RESULTS: Perfusion problems in the allograft were solved in all cases. We placed seven stents and embolized six competitive shunts. One anastomotic dysfunction was repaired. None of the patients died or rethrombosed during surgery or follow-up. CONCLUSION: Endovascular techniques during OLT can resolve some liver graft perfusion problems due to PVT and "steal" phenomena, especially with unsatisfactory eversion thromboendovenectomy in patients with grade IV PVT. Although primary permeability of stents has been good, these results need to be confirmed.