RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The systems approach has been used to evaluate higher education and explores inputs, transformation process, and outputs of a system that is also influenced by environmental factors such as COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic shifted many college students to different learning modes, changing their university experience. This study evaluated dietetics students' education experiences and characteristics in the latter period (spring 2022) of the COVID-19 pandemic using the systems approach. METHODS: Researchers developed and distributed an electronic survey to all 215 US-based Didactic Program in Dietetics (DPD) directors during March to May 2022 to forward to their students. Researchers calculated descriptive statistics for variables related to inputs, transformation process, and outputs in the systems approach. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 341) represented 51 DPDs in 31 states in the United States. Overall, DPD students (88.5%) were mostly or very satisfied with their choice of majoring in dietetics. Most (84.0%) planned to earn the RDN credential. Nearly half (46.9%) of DPD students were somewhat or extremely concerned about their readiness to continue their dietetics education path due to the pandemic-related learning conditions. Most students (43.6%) reported dissatisfaction with asynchronous remote instruction in laboratory courses. DPD students' GPAs remained consistent within the range of 3.75-4.0 from Fall 2019 (43.2%) to Spring 2022 (44.5%). The most important expectations of professors moving forward were to communicate effectively (97.3%), employ cultural humility (93.8%), eliminate discrimination in the classroom (93.6%), provide lecture slides (89.7%), and be flexible and accommodating (88.7%). CONCLUSIONS: DPD students emerged from COVID-19 with new perspectives and expectations for their university learning experience. Future research should explore the perspectives of DI directors, preceptors, and employers of COVID-19 era DPD graduates.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dietética , Humanos , Pandemias , Motivación , Estudiantes , COVID-19/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) following the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) for pediatric patients aged 2 to 18 years with high-risk medical conditions. The PPSV23 is not a routine immunization for all pediatric patients and children who meet criteria for high-risk conditions may not consistently receive the PPSV23 vaccine, despite current recommendations. The goal of this study was to determine PPSV23 -vaccination rates in the high-risk pediatric patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients were included if they were 2 to 18 years of age on January 1, 2019, with a diagnosis of diabetes, and had ≥1 encounters within the health care system in 2019. The primary outcome was PPSV23 vaccination rates in the high-risk diabetic pediatric population. Secondary outcomes included identifying missed opportunities for vaccinations and the incidence of invasive pneumococcal infections. RESULTS: A total of 366 patients met criteria for study inclusion. Patients had a mean age of 13.3 years and were predominantly white (69.8%). A total of 32 (8.7%) patients had documentation of PPSV23 vaccination. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There were 32 cases of pneumonia charted before patients received the PPSV23 and one case reported after patients received the PPSV23 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: PPSV23 vaccination rates were low in this high-risk diabetic pediatric group, with many -documented missed opportunities for vaccination. This may be attributed to the vaccine not being a -routinely recommended for all pediatric patients.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine-23 (PPSV23) vaccination use in high-risk pediatric patients with chronic heart disease (CHD). METHOD: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients were included if they were aged 2-18 years and were diagnosed with CHD. The primary outcome was PPSV23 vaccination. Secondary outcomes included missed opportunities and the incidence of infections. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-two patients were included; the mean age was 8.8 years. Only 40 patients (10.2%) had documentation of PPSV23 vaccination. Patients had a median number of three clinic visits in 2019. There were 114 cases of pneumonia documented in patients before receiving PPSV23 and one case reported after PPSV23 vaccination. DISCUSSION: PPSV23 vaccination in high-risk pediatric patients with CHD was low, with many documented missed opportunities for vaccination. This may be attributed to the PPSV23 not being a routine vaccination on the pediatric schedule.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacunación , Niño , Humanos , Enfermedad Crónica , Polisacáridos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Preescolar , AdolescenteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine websites of didactic programs in dietetics (DPD) for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related language and to assess perceived gender and ethnic/racial representation in images. METHODS: We conducted a content analysis on the first 6 website images and 3-elements of DPD (nâ¯=â¯212) websites (mission statement, goals and objectives, and the immediate landing page). Descriptive statistics and a website DEI score were calculated. RESULTS: Equity and inclusion-related terms appeared on < 5% of websites. Diversity and culture-related terms appeared on about one-third of websites. On average, researchers perceived 28.45% of people in website images as non-White, and 20.11% as non-female. Most websites received low DEI scores. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The DPD websites had a limited representation of DEI-related terms and image representation of individuals perceived to be non-female and non-White. Leaders of DPDs may consider displaying and describing the program's commitment to DEI on the website for potential students.