A produce prescription program for patients with low incomes in North Carolina resulted in increased produce purchases.

OBJECTIVES: To assess if participation in a North Carolina produce prescription program for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants with diet-sensitive health conditions (SuperSNAP) is associated with changes in purchase composition and spending source. METHODS: This study used loyalty-card transaction data (October 2019-April 2022). We applied a linear mixed-effects model with overlap weights to perform a difference-indifferences analysis of purchases by SuperSNAP program enrollees compared to the control group. RESULTS: The sample included 1440 SuperSNAP shoppers and 45,851 control shoppers. Compared to shoppers only on SNAP, SuperSNAP shoppers spent $82.98 (95% CI (75.6, 90.3), p-value <0.001) more per month, $76.09 (95% CI (69.4, 82.8), pvalue <0.001) of which were spent strictly on food and beverage products. Among SuperSNAP shoppers, out of the $40 SuperSNAP benefit each month, an estimated $34.86 (95% CI (33.9, 35.8), p-value <0.001) of it was spent on fruits and vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the promise of targeted produce prescription programs for SNAP participants in encouraging shifts in purchase composition.

Statewide Breastfeeding Hotline Use Among Tennessee WIC Participants.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of the Tennessee Breastfeeding Hotline (TBH), a 24 h/d, 7-d/wk telephonic lactation support program, based on Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participation. METHODS: Self-reported quantitative data were collected during the initial call. Data collected included caller type, maternal and infant characteristics, breastfeeding (BF) status, and primary reason for contacting the TBH. RESULTS: A total of 366 participants in WIC and 1,354 participants not enrolled in WIC received services through the TBH. Significant differences existed for maternal age, race, ethnicity, infant age, preterm delivery, caller type, and exclusive BF (P < .05). Among participants in WIC, lactation professionals primarily addressed concerns related to lactation and milk expression. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The TBH is a resource to address BF concerns, particularly among women who may face barriers to seeking professional lactation advice. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children agencies might consider implementing initiatives outside their standard scope of clinic practice to address participants' needs for BF support.

A Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Brief Smoking Cessation Intervention Implemented in Ohio Public Health Clinics, 2013.

OBJECTIVES: In 2006, the state of Ohio initiated the implementation of a brief smoking cessation intervention (5As: Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange) in select public health clinics that serve low-income pregnant and post-partum women. Funds later became available to expand the program statewide by 2015. However, close to half of the clinics initially trained stopped implementation of the 5As. To help guide the proposed statewide expansion plan for implementation of the 5As, this study assessed barriers and facilitators related to 5As implementation among clinics that had ever received training. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used, comprising semi-structured interviews with clinic program directors (n = 21) and a survey of clinic staff members (n = 120), to assess implementation-related barriers, facilitators, training needs, and staff confidence in delivering the 5As. RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews of program directors elucidated implementation barriers including time constraints, low self-efficacy in engaging resistant clients, and paperwork-related documentation challenges. Facilitators included availability of community referral resources, and integration of cessation interventions into the clinic workflow. Program directors believed they would benefit from more hands-on training in delivering the 5As. The survey results showed that a majority of staff felt confident advising (61%) or referring clients for tobacco dependence treatment (74%), but fewer felt confident about discussing treatment options with clients (29%) or providing support to clients who had relapsed (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Time constraints and documentation issues were major barriers to implementing the 5As. Simplified documentation processes and training enhancements, coupled with systems change, may enhance delivery of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions.