Novel Academic Tabletop 2022 (NAT22): A Dynamic Dice-Based Emergency Medicine Education Tool.

Gamification is an effective teaching tool that improves engagement and knowledge retention. Tabletop role-playing games are dynamic games that use random chance and foster player/leader partnership. To date, there are no teaching tools that mimic dynamic or unpredictable patient presentations. This style of game may work well as a tool for medical education in a simulation-based modality. In this report, we document the rules, materials, and training required to reproduce a hybrid game created to combine facets of simulation and tabletop role-playing games (TRPGs) to create a dynamic medical education tool. After testing the game for flaws and fluidity of gameplay, we plan to collect data evaluating emergency medicine residents' enjoyability and knowledge retention. In this article, we describe a novel TRPG simulation hybrid game that we hypothesize will improve learner enjoyability/engagement and have similar educational benefits to standard medical education.

Medical Student Learning Experience With Attending or Resident Preceptors in the Emergency Department.

Objectives The emergency department (ED) provides a unique learning environment for medical students. However, environment, patient, and preceptor factors limit standardized teaching. We explored the most effective educational interactions for fourth-year medical students during an emergency medicine (EM) clerkship designed to allow clinical interaction with both residents and faculty. Methods This is an exploratory, prospective, needs assessment study of objective cards and surveys submitted by medical students as part of their month-long fourth-year clinical rotation at a tertiary care academic ED. Students marked which topics or procedures they had reviewed, and who had precepted them. In an exit survey, students were asked to rate how often they received individualized teaching and whether their educational goals were met when working with residents and attendings. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected anonymously with institutional review board (IRB) exemption. Results Shift card data was collected from 69 of the rotating students. Attendings tended to precept visual diagnostics while residents tended to teach technical procedures. Forty-four students completed the exit survey. Results showed that students felt they received individualized teaching from both attendings and residents (7.9 and 8.0 respectively, p = 0.059). Students felt their goals were met more when reporting to the residents than the attendings but not significantly so (8.6 and 8.0, respectively, p = 0.088). Additional themes were that students wanted more individualized experiences with the attendings and requested more dedicated teaching shifts. Conclusions Fourth-year medical students in the ED felt they received individualized teaching on most shifts. They reported their education goals were met as often when working with residents as with attendings; however, interactions feature different educational content. Clerkship curricula design would benefit from resident and attending-directed teaching experiences to optimize the educational experience in the ED.

Development of a lecture evaluation tool rooted in cognitive load theory: A modified Delphi study.

Background: Didactics play a key role in medical education. There is no standardized didactic evaluation tool to assess quality and provide feedback to instructors. Cognitive load theory provides a framework for lecture evaluations. We sought to develop an evaluation tool, rooted in cognitive load theory, to assess quality of didactic lectures. Methods: We used a modified Delphi method to achieve expert consensus for items in a lecture evaluation tool. Nine emergency medicine educators with expertise in cognitive load participated in three modified Delphi rounds. In the first two rounds, experts rated the importance of including each item in the evaluation rubric on a 1 to 9 Likert scale with 1 labeled as "not at all important" and 9 labeled as "extremely important." In the third round, experts were asked to make a binary choice of whether the item should be included in the final evaluation tool. In each round, the experts were invited to provide written comments, edits, and suggested additional items. Modifications were made between rounds based on item scores and expert feedback. We calculated descriptive statistics for item scores. Results: We completed three Delphi rounds, each with 100% response rate. After Round 1, we removed one item, made major changes to two items, made minor wording changes to nine items, and modified the scale of one item. Following Round 2, we eliminated three items, made major wording changes to one item, and made minor wording changes to one item. After the third round, we made minor wording changes to two items. We also reordered and categorized items for ease of use. The final evaluation tool consisted of nine items. Conclusions: We developed a lecture assessment tool rooted in cognitive load theory specific to medical education. This tool can be applied to assess quality of instruction and provide important feedback to speakers.

Multi-Disciplinary Trauma Evaluation and Management Simulation (MD-TEAMS) training for emergency medicine and general surgery residents.

BACKGROUND: Successful trauma resuscitation relies on multi-disciplinary collaboration. In most academic programs, general surgery (GS) and emergency medicine (EM) residents rarely train together before functioning as a team. METHODS: In our Multi-Disciplinary Trauma Evaluation and Management Simulation (MD-TEAMS), EM and GS residents completed manikin-based trauma scenarios and were evaluated on resuscitation and communication skills. Residents were surveyed on confidence surrounding training objectives. RESULTS: Residents showed improved confidence running trauma scenarios in multi-disciplinary teams. Residents received lower communication scores from same-discipline vs cross-discipline faculty. EM residents scored higher in evaluation and planning domains; GS residents scored higher in action processes; groups scored equally in team management. Strong correlation existed between team leader communication and resuscitative skill completion. CONCLUSION: MD-TEAMS demonstrated correlation between communication and resuscitation checklist item completion and communication differences by resident specialty. In the future, we plan to evaluate training-related resident behavior changes and specialty-specific communication differences by residents.