The Feasibility of Omission of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Japanese Patients With Early Breast Cancer Treated With Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Background This study was aimed at analyzing the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) on Japanese patients with early-stage breast cancer and exploring the potential of PORT omission. Materials and methods Data from 794 patients with early-stage breast cancer (T1-2, N0-1), who underwent BCS with (n = 310) or without PORT (n = 484) were retrospectively analyzed. Local control (LC) rate and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were compared between the groups that received and did not receive PORT in the whole cohort and low-risk cohort (i.e., the cohort with negative surgical margin, lymph node negativity, and estrogen receptor positivity, excluding young age of 49 or less), and in low-risk subgroup using propensity-score matching. Results PORT was associated with better LC but not BCSS in the total population. In the low-risk cohort, the incidence of local recurrence in patients without and with PORT was 5.3% and 4.8%, respectively, at 10 years (p = 0.591), and 7.8% and 4.8%, respectively, according to propensity-score matching (p = 0.485). Conclusion PORT improved LC in the total population, but not BCSS or overall survival (OS). In the low-risk group analysis (negative surgical margin, lymph node negativity, estrogen receptor positivity, and age 50 years or more), equivalent LC, BCSS, and OS were found including propensity-matched comparison. Therefore, this study showed that the omission of PORT could be a treatment option for low-risk Japanese patients. Further multi-center prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and reduce the unnecessary burden of PORT for patients and institutions.

Effectiveness of eribulin as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative hormone-resistant advanced or metastatic breast cancer: findings from the multi-institutional, prospective, observational KBCRN A001: E-SPEC study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal positioning of eribulin treatment remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of eribulin administration as first- and second-line chemotherapy in patients with endocrine-resistant advanced or metastatic breast cancer (AMBC) in the real-world clinical setting. METHODS: This multi-institutional prospective cohort study enrolled patients with triple-negative AMBC or estrogen receptor-positive AMBC refractory to at least one previous endocrine therapy. The overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line (OS1) and second-line chemotherapy (OS2) was assessed. Data analysis included real-world chemotherapy sequences of first- to third-line chemotherapy regimens. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for treatment regimen comparison was calculated using a stratified proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Among 201 patients enrolled, 180 were included in the final analysis. Eribulin was administered as first- and second-line chemotherapy to 46 (26.6%) and 70 (47.9%) patients, respectively. Median OS1 and OS2 were 2.25 (95% CI 1.07-2.68) and 1.75 (95% CI, 1.28-2.45) years for first- and second-line eribulin, respectively. Oral 5-FU followed by eribulin had a numerically longer OS1 (2.84 years) than the other sequences. Among patients who proceeded to second-line or later chemotherapy, the median OS1 for those treated with anthracycline or taxane as first- or second-line (n = 98) was 2.56 years (95% CI 2.27-2.74), while it was 2.87 years (95% CI 2.20-4.32) for those who avoided anthracycline and taxane as first- and second-line (n = 48) (adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI 0.70-2.06). In the exploratory analysis, OS1 was 2.55 (95% CI 2.14-2.75) and 2.91 years (95% CI 2.61-4.32) for those aged < 65 and ≥ 65 years, respectively (adjusted HR of ≥ 65, 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin or oral 5-FU administration in first- and second-line chemotherapy without anthracycline/taxane was acceptable in the real-world setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov (NCT 02,551,263).

Oral care and oral assessment guide in breast cancer patients receiving everolimus and exemestane: subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial (Oral Care-BC).

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis is a clinically significant adverse event linked to cancer therapy; it reduces the quality of life of patients and may result in the discontinuation of treatment and a poorer prognosis. Based on level 3 evidence, the Mucositis Study Group of Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society of Oral Oncology recommend oral care for all patients receiving cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy, although no data from large-scaled randomized controlled trials support the efficacy of oral care in preventing oral mucositis. Therefore, this randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, phase III study sought to determine whether professional oral care reduces oral mucositis in everolimus and exemestane-treated estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Altogether, 169 patients were randomized into the professional oral care (n=82) and control (n=87) groups. The professional oral care group received oral health instruction, professional mechanical tooth and tongue cleaning, gargling with a benzethonium chloride mouthwash, and dexamethasone ointment when grade 1 mucositis manifested. The control group received oral health instruction and gargling. Eight weeks after the everolimus and exemestane administration, the oral status (Oral Assessment Guide criteria) and oral mucositis status (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events functional and clinical examinations) were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of oral mucositis of any grade and grade 2 severe mucositis was significantly lower in the professional oral care group, based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events functional and clinical examinations. The total Oral Assessment Guide score, total Oral Assessment Guide grade, and Oral Assessment Guide score of teeth/dentures and mucous membranes were significantly different between the two groups. The Oral Assessment Guide grade for swallow, lip, teeth/dentures, mucous membrane, tongue, and saliva significantly correlated to oral mucositis severity. CONCLUSIONS: Professional oral care may prevent oral mucositis and improve teeth/denture conditions in patients receiving everolimus and exemestane.

Secondary endpoints analysis in patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with everolimus and exemestane enrolled in Oral Care-BC.

BACKGROUND: The Oral Care BC-trial reported that professional oral care (POC) reduces the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE). However, the effect of POC on clinical response among patients receiving EVE and EXE was not established. We compared outcomes for estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received POC to those who had not, and evaluated clinical prognostic factors. All patients simultaneously received EVE and EXE. METHODS: Between May 2015 and Dec 2017, 174 eligible patients were enrolled in the Oral Care-BC trial. The primary endpoint was the comparative incidence of grade 1 or worse oral mucositis, as evaluated for both the groups over 8 weeks by an oncologist. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Data were collected after a follow-up period of 13.9 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in PFS between the POC and Control Groups (P = 0.801). A BMI <  25 mg/m2 and non-visceral metastasis were associated with longer PFS (P = 0.018 and P = 0.003, respectively) and the use of bone modifying agents (BMA) was associated with shorter PFS (P = 0.028). The PFS and OS between the POC and control groups were not significantly different in the Oral-Care BC trial. CONCLUSIONS: POC did not influence the prognosis of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with non-visceral metastasis, a BMI <  25 mg/m2, and who did not receive BMA while receiving EVE and EXE may have better prognoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered online at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan (protocol ID 000016109), on January 5, 2015 and at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02376985 ).

The effect of denosumab in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: 36-month results.

INTRODUCTION: Aromatase inhibitor (AI)-associated bone loss increases the risk of bone fracture and reduces patients' quality of life, making it a critical issue worldwide. We conducted a prospective non-randomized clinical trial (UMIN-CTR, UMIN 000016173) to assess the effect of denosumab on bone loss in patients treated with adjuvant AI and have previously reported the results at 12 and 24 months. This study aimed to present the results at 36 months of treatment with denosumab for osteopenia in breast cancer patients who were undergoing treatment with adjuvant AI; 36 months is the longest denosumab treatment period reported so far. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received 60-mg denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months. Daily supplements containing 500-mg elemental calcium and at least 400 international units of vitamin D were highly recommended throughout the study period. The levels of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers, serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b, and bone alkaline phosphatase were determined at baseline and 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. RESULTS: At 36 months, the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, right femoral neck, and left femoral neck were found to increase by 8.8% (95% confidence interval CI 7.6-10.1), 4.3% (95% CI 3.0-5.5), and 3.1% (95% CI 2.1-4.1), respectively. No non-traumatic clinical fractures occurred in patients receiving AI and denosumab. CONCLUSION: Twice-yearly administration of denosumab to the breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant AI, regardless of the skeletal site, resulted in consistent increases in BMD without severe adverse events at 36 months.

[A Case of Synchronous Bilateral Male Breast Cancer].

A 71-year-old man with right and left mammary tumor came to our hospital. Using needle biopsy, we diagnosed both tumors as ER-positive, PgR-positive, and HER2(1+)invasive ductalcarcinoma. We performed radicalmastectomy and axillary dissection. After surgery, the patient received postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy. The incidence of male breast cancer has been reported to be<1% of all breast cancer cases; only a few cases of simultaneous bilateral male breast cancer has been reported. Here, we report a rare case of synchronous bilateral male breast cancer.

Comparison of the efficacy of cryotherapy and compression therapy for preventing nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy: A prospective self-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the efficacy of cryotherapy and compression therapy to prevent taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy has been reported. We prospectively compared the efficacy of cryotherapy using a frozen glove (FG) and compression therapy using a surgical glove (SG) to prevent nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX)-induced peripheral neuropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients who received 260 mg/m2 of nab-PTX were eligible to participate in this trial. Patients wore a FG on one hand (60 min) without changing and two SGs of the same size (i.e., one size smaller than the size that best fit their hand) on the other hand (90 min) during chemotherapy. Peripheral neuropathy was evaluated at each treatment cycle using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0, the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane subscale. Temperatures at each fingertip in both groups were measured thermographically. RESULTS: Between August 2017 and March 2019, 43 patients were enrolled and 38 were evaluated. No cases showed discordance of peripheral neuropathy between each gloved group in cases of CTCAE ≥ grade 2. In cases of PNQ ≥ grade D, using the Nam equivalence test, the upper test (P = 0.0329) and lower test (P = 0.0052) both showed negative results in comparisons between each gloved group. Fingertip temperature was significantly lower in the FG group than in the SG group after treatment (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: It seems to be no difference in incidence of nab-PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy using either cryotherapy or compression therapy.

[A Case of Small Cell Carcinoma of the Breast].

A 67-year-old woman with a mass in the right breast was admitted to our hospital. The tumor measured 35mm in diameter in the right breast, and the lymph node measured 30mm in diameter in the right axilla. The mass was diagnosed as malignant based on core needle biopsy. Immunohistochemistry staining for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and CD56 was positive, suggesting that the tumor was small cell carcinoma. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging excluded any other primary disease. Thus, the patient was diagnosed as having primary small cell carcinoma of the breast. Modified radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection was performed. The pathological diagnosis of the surgical material confirmed small cell carcinoma. The expression of estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptors was negative. After surgery, chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-based breast cancer treatment were performed. The patient was relapse free 9 months after surgery.

Efficacy of denosumab for restoring normal bone mineral density in women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a major side effect of aromatase inhibitors (AIs), which are greatly effective in the treatment of breast cancer. However, there are no satisfactory measures against osteoporosis. In this multicenter, randomized, comparative study, we evaluate the efficacy of denosumab for preventing loss of bone mineral density (BMD) induced by adjuvant therapy with AI s in breast cancer patients with normal BMD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The bone loss-suppressing effect of denosumab will be comparatively evaluated in postmenopausal patients scheduled to receive letrozole or anastrozole as a postoperative endocrine therapy for stage I-IIIA hormone-sensitive breast cancer and a control group. Patients will be administered letrozole 2.5 mg or anastrozole 1 mg once a day, and the treatment will be continued for 5 years unless recurrence, secondary cancer, or unacceptable toxicity develops. Patients in the denosumab group will receive a subcutaneous injection of 60 mg of denosumab every 6 months. The primary endpoint is the rate of change in the lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD, as determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), 12 months after the start of the injection. The secondary endpoints were ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:: The protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine and all the participating faculties. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before registration, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results of the study will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT03324932, Japan Registry of Clinical Trial (jRCT): CRB5180001.

Predictive factors for the efficacy of denosumab in postmenopausal Japanese women with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: a combined analysis of two prospective clinical trials.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the gold standard therapy for breast cancer in postmenopausal women. AI suppresses the conversion of androgens to estrogens; however, this results in osteopenia, osteoporosis, and bone fracture, thus reducing the patient's quality of life. The use of adjuvant denosumab reduces the risk of clinical fractures in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer receiving AI. However, the efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of AI-associated bone loss has not been prospectively evaluated in Japan. In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictive factors for the efficacy of denosumab in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with AI by analyzing the results of two prospective trials. The patients received 60 mg denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months. The primary endpoint was percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to month 12 in lumbar spine. Post hoc analysis and T tests were performed. A total of 205 patients were enrolled. At 12 and 24 months, the lumbar spine BMD increased by 5.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-6.3] and 8.3% (95% CI 7.5-9.1), respectively. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the time of AI therapy initiation, type of AI therapy, age, time since menopause, baseline body mass index, and BMD. The results showed that baseline lumbar and left femoral BMD was significantly associated with a percentage change in these sites, respectively. In addition, baseline left femoral BMD was also associated with a change in lumbar BMD. In conclusion, the baseline BMD in the lumbar spine was a predictive indicator for the efficacy of denosumab in this site and the baseline BMD in left femoral neck was a predictive indicator in lumbar spine and left femur.

[A Case of Breast Cancer with Parenchymal and Meningeal Central Nervous System Metastases Treated with Multimodality Therapy].

A 64-year-old woman who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)- targeted therapy underwent modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node resection for HER2-positiveright breast cancer. After the surgery, chemotherapy, post-mastectomy radiation therapy, and HER2-targeted therapy were administered as adjuvant therapies. Two years and 6 months postoperatively, she complained of headaches and nausea. Magnetic resonance imaging showed brain metastasis, which was treated with gamma knife surgery. Two weeks later, she was urgently admitted to the hospital because of impaired consciousness. Based on cerebrospinal fluid cytology, she was diagnosed with meningeal metastasis of breast cancer. She developed hydrocephalus; thus, external ventricular drainage was performed, and a ventriculoperitoneal shunt was inserted. She was treated with whole-brain irradiation(30 Gy)and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)as systemic therapy. Treatment of the patient was possible without recurrence continuously for over 12 months and with the maintenance of daily activities. The prognosis of patients with meningeal metastasis of breast cancer is extremely poor, and effective pharmacotherapy has not yet been established. T-DM1 may improvepatie nts' quality of lifeand the clinical outcomes of meningeal metastasis.

Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density in Japanese women with osteoporosis treated with aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer.

Adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy, for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, in postmenopausal women is associated with bone loss, leading to an increased risk of fractures. Denosumab, an antibody raised against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand, has been proven to protect against AI-induced bone loss. Hence, we aimed to determine whether denosumab is effective in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis, treated with AI. We prospectively evaluated the bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine and the bilateral femoral neck in 102 postmenopausal women with clinical hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, stages I-IIIA, during a postoperative period of 12 months. The other inclusion criteria for this study were: women that should receive AIs as adjuvant therapy and those with evidence of osteoporosis (lumbar spine or bilateral femoral neck BMD, equivalent to T-score classification of ≤ - 2.5) upon enrollment. The patients received supplemental calcium, vitamin D, and 60 mg of subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months. The BMD of the lumber spine increased by 4.9 and 6.6% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. An increase in BMD was observed at the femoral neck, bilaterally. Hypocalcemia ≥ grade 2, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and non-traumatic clinical fracture were not observed in this study. Our findings revealed that biannual treatment with denosumab is associated with a great increase of BMD in Japanese women receiving adjuvant AI therapy, irrespective of their previous history of AI therapy.

Predictive factors for taxane acute pain syndrome determined by ordered logistic regression analysis.

This retrospective study was undertaken to identify predictive factors for developing taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) and to determine new strategies for improving QoL in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Between November 2010 and May 2018, we enrolled 121 breast cancer patients at our outpatient chemotherapy center who were undergoing chemotherapy with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) every 3 weeks. Variables related to the development of TAPS were extracted from the patients' clinical records and used for regression analysis. The degree of TAPS was classified as grade 0 = not developed; grade 1 = developed but did not require analgesics; grade 2 = developed but alleviated by analgesics such as acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); or grade 3 = syndrome developed, causing sleep problems or interfering with daily living activities, but not alleviated by analgesics such as acetaminophen or NSAIDs thus requiring opioids. Multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for the development of TAPS. Significant factors identified for the development of TAPS included dose of nab-PTX (odds ratio (OR) = 11.717, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 11.6161-11.8182; P = 0.0421) and the administration of dexamethasone for up to 3 days (OR = 0.133, 95% CI = 0.0235-0.7450; P = 0.0223). In conclusion, a high dose of nab-PTX and the lack of dexamethasone administration for up to 3 days were identified as significant predictors of the development of TAPS.

Effect of denosumab on low bone mineral density in postmenopausal Japanese women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for non-metastatic breast cancer: 24-month results.

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been established as the gold-standard therapy for postmenopausal patients. Worldwide, adjuvant denosumab at a dose of 60 mg twice per year reduces the risk of clinical fractures in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer who received AI. However, the efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of AI-associated bone loss had not been prospectively evaluated in Japan. Previously, we reported the 12-month effect of denosumab in Japanese patients for the first time; the primary endpoint was the change in the percentage of bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine from baseline to 12 months. METHODS: This secondary follow-up study prospectively evaluated the change in the percentage of BMD of the lumbar spine from baseline to 24 months. Postmenopausal women with early-stage, histologically confirmed, hormone receptor-positive, invasive breast cancer who were receiving or scheduled to receive AI were included. Denosumab was administered subcutaneously on day 1 of the study and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The lumbar spine and bilateral femoral neck BMD was measured at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. RESULTS: At 18 and 24 months, the lumbar spine BMD increased by 5.9 and 7.0%, respectively. The femoral neck BMD also increased. Grade ≥ 2 hypocalcemia, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and atypical femoral fractures did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective study showed that semiannual treatment with denosumab was associated with continuously increased BMD in Japanese women receiving adjuvant AI therapy for up to 24 months, regardless of prior AI treatment.

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving First-line Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel shows promise for metastatic disease; however, there is no predictive biomarker. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used to evaluate the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had not received any prior chemotherapy or hormone therapy were included. DCE-MRI was conducted at baseline and after one and two cycles of bevacizumab and paclitaxel. The percentage change in the volume transfer constant (ΔKtrans) and the correlation of ΔKtrans with tumour regression and time to progression (TTP) were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean ΔKtrans from baseline after one and two cycles was -51.4% and -55.1%, respectively. Patients with ΔKtrans ≥50% displayed more tumour regression than those with ΔKtrans <50%; TTP was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate a decrease in blood permeability following bevacizumab and paclitaxel using DCE-MRI and a correlation between ΔKtrans and tumour regression.

[A Case of Bone Marrow Carcinomatosis of Occult Breast Cancer Treated Effectively with Fulvestrant].

A 63-year-old woman experienced left cervical lymph node swelling since May 2012. Based on PET-CT findings, metastases of a malignant tumor to the mediastinal, axillary, and left cervical lymph nodes were suspected. Her left cervical lymph node biopsy revealed metastatic carcinoma of occult cancer, because no primary tumor could be identified despite the specific examinations. She rejected further therapeutic intervention. In July 2013, she was admitted because of anemia, cardiac failure, and fever. She was diagnosed with bone marrow carcinomatosis from occult cancer based on her bone marrow biopsy. Metastatic breast cancer was mostly considered because she tested positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors, CA15-3 levels were increased, and her axillary lymph nodes were swollen. Fulvestrant and zoledronic acid were administered and continued for 20 months, with improvement in anemia and tumor marker levels, and also maintenance of partial response.

Phase II Clinical Trial of First-line Eribulin Plus Trastuzumab for Advanced or Recurrent HER2-positive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Eribulin mesylate has been approved for advanced or metastatic breast cancers subjected to at least two previous chemotherapy regimens. The present multicenter, phase II, single-arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen of eribulin plus trastuzumab for untreated advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolled patients received eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 intravenously; I.V.) on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle, an initial trastuzumab dose (8 mg/kg I.V.) on day 1, and 6 mg/kg of trastuzumab on day 1 of each subsequent cycle. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety. Twenty-eight patients (median age: 62.5 years) received a median of 12 (range: 2-53) cycles of eribulin plus trastuzumab. RESULTS: The RR was 53.6% [complete response (CR), 4; partial response (PR), 11] with a median PFS of 344 days. The clinical benefit rate was 64.0%. Grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in 12 (42.9%) patients. For details, neutropenia in 8 (28.6%) patients, peripheral neuropathy in 2 (7.1%) patients, interstitial pneumonia in 1 (3.6%) patient, ALT elevation in 1 (3.6%) patient, osteonecrosis of the jaw in 1 (3.6%) patient, and fatigue in 1 (3.6%) patient. The patient with osteonecrosis received denosumab, too. No symptomatic congestive heart failure was observed. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy of eribulin plus trastuzumab is acceptable in efficacy and safety, and a capable option for first-line advanced or recurrent HER2-positive breast cancer.

Effect of denosumab on bone mineral density in Japanese women with osteopenia treated with aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: subgroup analyses of a Phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to conduct subgroup analyses of therapeutic effects of 12-month denosumab therapy on the percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline in the lumber spine and femoral neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck of 100 hormone receptor-positive, clinical stage I-IIIA postoperative postmenopausal breast cancer patients, for whom treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as adjuvant endocrine therapy was scheduled. The primary endpoint was the percent change in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to 12 months. Patient subgroups were analyzed according to baseline variables that are known risk factors for bone loss, including previous AI therapy, age, time since menopause, baseline body mass index (BMI), and baseline BMD T-score. RESULTS: At 12 months, lumbar spine BMD increased by 4.7%; the patients who were administered AI therapy prior to denosumab (n=70) demonstrated a 4.7% increase in BMD, and the patients who received denosumab at the start of AI therapy (n=30) demonstrated a 4.5% increase in BMD (p=0.8385). Additionally, 2.4% and 1.4% increases in BMD of the right and left femoral neck, respectively, were observed. Initiation of AI (with denosumab, before denosumab), type of AI (non-steroidal, steroidal), age (<65, ≥65 years), time since menopause (≤5, >5 years), BMI (<25, ≥25 kg/m2), and T-score (≤-1.0, >-1.0) of the right femoral neck were as follows: (2.2%, 2.5%, p=0.7773), (2.6%, 0.9%, p=0.1726), (2.5%, 2.3%, p=0.7594), (2.1%, 2.4%, p=0.2034), (2.1%, 2.9%, p=0.2034), and (2.3%, 2.7%, p=0.6823), respectively. Initiation of AI (with denosumab, before denosumab), type of AI (non-steroidal, steroidal), age (<65, ≥65 years), time since menopause (≤5, >5 years), BMI (<25, ≥25 kg/m2), and T-score (≤-1.0, >-1.0) of the left femoral neck were as follows: (1.0%, 1.5%, p=0.1972), (1.2%, 2.7%, p=0.2931), (1.4%, 1.3%, p=0.8817), (-0.1%, 1.6%, p=0.1766), (1.3%, 1.9%, p=0.6465), and (1.5%, 1.1%, p=0.6573), respectively. CONCLUSION: Twice-yearly treatment with denosumab was associated with increased BMD among Japanese women receiving adjuvant AI therapy, regardless of the baseline characteristics or skeletal site.

[Experience of Fulvestrant for Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer].

Several cases of hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced and recurrent breast cancer treated with fulvestrant (FUL)were retrospectively investigated to assess the efficacy and safety of the treatment. FUL was administered to a total of 41 patients-33 with recurrent and 8 with Stage IV cancer-from January 2012 to September 2016. The median number of lines that used FUL was 3, the median time to treatment failure(TTF)was 7 months, the overall response rate(RR)was 19.5%, and the clinical benefit rate(CBR)was 53.6%. Our result was similar to those of the FIRST and the FALCON studies, which showed a decrease in RR after the fourth-line. With regard to RR, FUL seemed to provide better results at Cthird-lines of treatment. While a shorter TTF was seen in the cases with liver metastases, a longer TTF was seen in the cases with soft tissue metastases. Therefore, it may be helpful to consider the site of metastasis when predicting the effects of FUL.

Effect of denosumab administration on low bone mineral density (T-score -1.0 to -2.5) in postmenopausal Japanese women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for non-metastatic breast cancer.

Although adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy is widely used in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, it is known to be associated with bone loss and increased fracture risk. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand, has been shown to protect against AI-induced bone loss. However, the efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of AI-associated bone loss has not been prospectively evaluated in Japan. We prospectively monitored bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and bilateral femoral necks in 100 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive postoperative breast cancer of clinical stage I-IIIA in whom treatment with AI as adjuvant endocrine therapy was planned or had been ongoing. Study participants received supplemental calcium and vitamin D every day and denosumab (60 mg) subcutaneously every 6 months. At enrollment, patients were required to have evidence of low bone mass without meeting the criteria for osteoporosis. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at month 12. At 6 and 12 months, lumbar spine BMD increased by 3.3 and 4.7%, respectively. BMD of the femoral necks also increased. Hypocalcemia of grade ≥2, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and non-traumatic clinical fracture did not occur. In conclusion, semi-annual treatment with denosumab was associated with increased BMD in Japanese women receiving adjuvant AI therapy, regardless of prior AI treatment.