Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Pediatric Patients Receiving Intermittent Hemodialysis or Hemodiafiltration.

INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin is a common antibiotic used to treat hemodialysis (HD) or hemodiafiltration (HDF)-related infections in pediatric patients, but optimal dosing remains unknown. This is the first observational study to characterize the pharmacokinetics and evaluate dosing of vancomycin in this population. METHODS: Eligible patients received IV vancomycin 10 mg/kg per dose postdialysis followed by a series of serum vancomycin concentrations collected before, immediately after, 1 hour after, and 4 hours after dialysis. The pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using 1- and 2-compartment models and a nonlinear least-squares algorithm. RESULTS: Among 42 vancomycin courses in 16 patients, 1 compartment model had the best fit for observed data. The net drug removal was 43 ± 13% (39% for HD and 50% for HDF) from an average 3-hour HD/HDF session. The mean elimination constant was 0.28 h-1 (standard deviation [SD], 0.11 h-1) during the intradialytic period compared with 0.0049 h-1 (SD, 0.004 h-1) when off dialysis. The mean volume of distribution was 0.65 (SD, 0.19) L/kg. Duration of dialysis session and mode of dialysis (HD vs. HDF) were significant predictors of vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters. Half-life was shorter for HDF compared with HD (2.1 vs. 3.5 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the simulations, an initial vancomycin dose of 10 mg/kg per dose and redosing postdialysis was optimal to achieve a vancomycin concentration range of 5 to 12 mg/L at 4 hours postdialysis and 24-hour area under the curve over minimum inhibitory concentration of ≥400 hours. Therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary to account for residual variability in vancomycin elimination in pediatric patients receiving HD/HDF.

Solid organ transplant-specific antibiogram in a tertiary pediatric hospital in Canada.

SOT recipients are more vulnerable to infections with antimicrobial-resistant organisms, and therefore, it may be useful for transplant centers to create transplant-specific antibiograms to direct empirical antimicrobial regimens and monitor trends in antimicrobial resistance. SOT-specific antibiograms were created using antimicrobial susceptibility data on isolates from 2012 to 2018 at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The CLSI guidelines were followed to generate the antibiograms except that results from 2 years of data were pooled on a rolling basis to achieve larger sample sizes. The 3 most frequent organisms in one analysis period of the SOT antibiogram were Escherichia coli (average sample size ±standard deviation; n = 28.7 ± 3.8), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 27.8 ± 5.0), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (non-CF) (n = 19.8 ± 8.8). For E.coli, susceptibilities in the SOT antibiogram were significantly lower than those in the hospital-wide antibiogram in 2017-2018 for ampicillin (27% vs 47%; p = .014), piperacillin/tazobactam (55% vs 88%; p < .001), cefotaxime (59% vs 89%; p < .001), ciprofloxacin (71% vs 88%; p = .007), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (41% vs 69%; p = .001), but not significantly different for aminoglycosides and meropenem. In the SOT antibiogram of E. coli, decreased susceptibility trend was confirmed in some antibiotics, including piperacillin/tazobactam (83% in 2012-2013 vs 55% in 2017-2018). At our center, the solid organ transplant-specific antibiogram revealed important differences in E. coli susceptibilities and trends in antimicrobial resistance. Developing a SOT antibiogram will assist in revising and improving empiric treatment guidelines as well as monitoring antimicrobial resistance in this population.

Live vaccines after pediatric solid organ transplant: Proceedings of a consensus meeting, 2018.

Growing evidence suggests receipt of live-attenuated viral vaccines after solid organ transplant (SOT) has occurred and is safe and needed due to lapses in herd immunity. A 2-day consortium of experts in infectious diseases, transplantation, vaccinology, and immunology was held with the objective to review evidence and create expert recommendations for clinicians when considering live viral vaccines post-SOT. For consideration of VV and MMR post-transplant, evidence exists only for kidney and liver transplant recipients. For MMR vaccine post-SOT, consider vaccination during outbreak or travel to endemic risk areas. Patients who have received antiproliferative agents (eg. mycophenolate mofetil), T cell-depleting agents, or rituximab; or have persistently elevated EBV viral loads, or are in a state of functional tolerance, should be vaccinated with caution and have a more in-depth evaluation to define benefit of vaccination and net state of immune suppression prior to considering vaccination. MMR and/or VV (not combined MMRV) is considered to be safe in patients who are clinically well, are greater than 1 year after liver or kidney transplant and 2 months after acute rejection episode, can be closely monitored, and meet specific criteria of "low-level" immune suppression as defined in the document.

A randomized clinical trial of age and genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing after pediatric solid organ transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics are influenced by age and CYP3A5 genotype with CYP3A5 expressors (CYP3A5*1/*1 or *1/*3) being fast metabolizers. However, the benefit of genotype-guided dosing in pediatric solid organ transplantation has been understudied. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether age and CYP3A5 genotype-guided starting dose of tacrolimus result in earlier attainment of therapeutic drug concentrations. SETTING: Single hospital-based transplant center. METHODS: This was a randomized, semi-blinded, 30-day pilot trial. Between 2012 and 2016, pediatric patients listed for solid organ transplant were consented and enrolled into the study. Participants were categorized as expressors, CYP3A5*1/*1 or CYP3A5*1/*3, and nonexpressors, CYP3A5*3/*3. Patients were stratified by age (≤ or > 6 years) and randomized (2:1) after transplant to receive genotype-guided (n = 35) or standard (n = 18) starting dose of tacrolimus for 36-48 hours and were followed for 30 days. RESULTS: Median age at transplant in the randomized cohort was 2.1 (0.75-8.0) years; 24 (45%) were male. Participants in the genotype-guided arm achieved therapeutic concentrations earlier at a median (IQR) of 3.4 (2.5-6.6) days compared to those in the standard dosing arm of 4.7 (3.5-8.6) days (P = 0.049), and had fewer out-of-range concentrations [OR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.44, 0.83), P = 0.002] compared to standard dosing, with no difference in frequency of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: CYP3A5 genotype-guided dosing stratified by age resulted in earlier attainment of therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations and fewer out-of-range concentrations.

Liver transplantation for children with acute liver failure associated with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare life-threatening systemic disease, characterized by overwhelming stimulation of the immune system and categorized as primary or secondary types. Occasionally, acute liver failure (ALF) may dominate the clinical presentation. Given the systemic nature of HLH and risk of recurrence, HLH is considered by many a contraindication to liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study is to review our single-center experience with LT in children with secondary HLH and ALF (HLH-ALF). This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study of children with secondary HLH-ALF that underwent LT in 2005-2014. Of 246 LTs, 9 patients (3 males; median age, 5 years; range, 0.7-15.4 years) underwent LT for secondary HLH-ALF. Disease progression was rapid with median 14 days (range, 6-27 days) between first symptoms and LT. Low fibrinogen/high triglycerides, elevated ferritin, hemophagocytosis on liver biopsy, and soluble interleukin 2 receptor levels were the most commonly fulfilled diagnostic criteria; HLH genetic studies were negative in all patients. Immunosuppressive therapy after LT included corticosteroids adjusted to HLH treatment protocol and tacrolimus. Thymoglobulin (n = 5), etoposide (n = 4), and alemtuzumab (n = 2) were used in cases of recurrence. Five (56%) patients experienced HLH recurrence, 1 requiring repeat LT, and 3 died. Overall graft and patient survival were 60% and 67%, respectively. Six patients are alive and well at a median of 24 months (range, 15-72 months) after transplantation. In conclusion, LT can be beneficial in selected patients with secondary HLH-ALF and can restore good health in an otherwise lethal condition. Liver Transplantation 22 1245-1253 2016 AASLD.

Continuous infusion of thymoglobulin for induction therapy in pediatric heart transplant recipients; experience and outcomes with a novel strategy for administration.

Minimal data exist on the perioperative use of TG for induction in pediatric HTx recipients. We report our experience using continuous infusion of TG on (i) perioperative adverse events, (ii) rejection, (iii) CAV, and (iv) PTLD. TG was infused via peripheral intravenous intra- and perioperatively as a continuous infusion (24 h/day). Starting dose was 1.5 mg/kg/day titrated to achieve target lymphocyte count of 0.1-0.3 x 10(9)/L. Fifty-five patients received TG; mean age at HTx was 4.4 yr (1 day-17.8 yr). The mean duration of TG was three and a half days (2-7 days). Median platelet count during TG infusion was 95 x 10(9)/L (28-228). Five patients had TG stopped for low platelets (at 4-6 days post-HTx) - all started maintenance immunosuppression. There was no perioperative mortality due to infection. Mean follow-up of 46 survivors was 2.3 yr (0.6-5.8 yr). Fifty-one percent had > or = ISHLT 2R rejection at a median time of 33 days post-HTx (7 days-2 yr). One patient developed PTLD 1.4 yr post-HTx; three patients developed mild-moderate CAV. TG as a continuous infusion appears to have a good safety profile. Though mild thrombocytopenia was prevalent, there was no bleeding attributable solely to TG. Whether early depletion of T-cell function will translate into long-term benefits remains to be determined.

Amiodarone-sirolimus/tacrolimus interaction in a pediatric heart transplant patient.

A two year-old female who had underwent ABO-incompatible heart transplantation at four months of age was admitted with unexplained anemia and renal dysfunction. The patient also had evidence of moderate liver dysfunction. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. Tacrolimus was held on day 2 for five days because of an elevated trough blood concentration. The patient required one fourth of her maintenance dose to keep trough concentrations within the target range. Nadolol and amiodarone were prescribed on day 7 to control ventricular arrhythmias. Sirolimus was prescribed on day 11. A precautionary (non-steady-state) sirolimus trough concentration was grossly elevated. Sirolimus was held and tacrolimus was discontinued. Sirolimus blood concentrations remained above the target range for fourteen days despite successive dose manipulations. The patient succumbed from complications of ECMO on day 42. Amiodarone and cyclosporine interactions in the solid organ transplant population have been previously described. To our knowledge, there are no cases of amiodarone and sirolimus or tacrolimus interactions reported in English literature. Both tacrolimus and sirolimus are metabolized through the same enzyme system as cyclosporine, and the chance of a similar interaction occurring is high. Sirolimus is also a substrate of p-glycoprotein and thus may be significantly affected by amiodarone. We have described a potential interaction with sirolimus, tacrolimus and amiodarone. If amiodarone is deemed the most appropriate choice for the patient, clinicians should consider prospectively decreasing sirolimus and tacrolimus doses. Blood concentrations should also be monitored more frequently in order to minimize prolonged periods of supratherapeutic concentrations and related toxicities.

Randomized clinical trial of tacrolimus- vs cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in pediatric heart transplantation: preliminary results at 15-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: While Tacrolimus (Tac) and Cyclosporine (Cya) immunosuppression are used after cardiac transplantation (tx), few studies have evaluated their use in pediatric patients. METHODS: We randomized 26 heart transplant recipients (pts) in a prospective, open-label trial to Tac (n = 14) or Cya (n = 12) to compare their efficacy and side-effects. Mean age at tx was 4.2 years for Tac and 5.8 years for Cya. Mean follow-up was 26 months (range: 11-39 months) for Tac and 24 months for Cya (range: 33-13 months). RESULTS: Our data suggest that both regimens are efficacious in the pediatric population. Conversion from Cya to Tac was useful for dealing with persistent rejection, although this sample did not suggest lower incidence of acute cellular rejection in the Tac group. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are required to establish pharmacokinetic parameters to enhance therapeutic monitoring of these patients to minimize side effects and enhance outcomes.